It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Max_TO
The president is no religious leader , he is however bound by oath to up hold the constitution , you know the whole preserve protect and defend thing , wether he likes it or not . As such he needs to know his roll .
Originally posted by WonkoTheSane
I'm sorry but you do not go to a catholic School and cover up a depicted symbol for J.C. When Obama entered onto the schools grounds, he was their guest, not the other way around. Interesting that the Catholics didn't deny his request though. I'm not saying either outcome is wrong or right, what I am saying is that Berry shouldn't have done that. In doing so he overstepped his place. plain and simple.
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
So using that form of logic , if the government ever does a photo op in your presence then can we expect them to drape something over you ?
Of course not . Our rights are guaranteed , photo op or no photo op .
The symbol was not covered as a means to disassociate from one religion or another .
As the reason for the covering was stated earlier in this thread I will refrain from repeating what has already been said and will count on those few people left interested in this topic to check the back posts for them selves .
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
Perhaps you can answer me a question , at what point does a persons rights and freedom take a back seat to a branch of government ?
If they are invited in or not ? Perhaps you can show that amendment in the constitution ?
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
As the reason for the covering was stated earlier in this thread I will refrain from repeating what has already been said and will count on those few people left interested in this topic to check the back posts for them selves .
Originally posted by Max_TO
That was the answer , if you care to read what's has already been said you will see that no right was subverted .
Seeing how I have answered you perhaps you can answer me , at what point does a persons rights and freedom take a back seat to a branch of government ?
Originally posted by Max_TO
reply to post by evil incarnate
Dear God I had stated this repeatedly
You sir refused to check back posts and you refused to read what was being said .
No right was subverted as I have pointed out a number of times , given there reason to cover the symbol was actually based on respect of the symbol . But seeing how you refuse to check the back posts you have missed this entirely .
I am replying to your belief that the government has a right to subvert the constitutional right of a person . They do not have that right wether they are invited in or not .
Edit to add .. Perhaps you need to pay attention to what's being said and read a thread before you jump in and make assumptions ?
[edit on 9-5-2009 by Max_TO]
Originally posted by RRconservative
When Mr. Obama was campaigning he did everything he could to distance himself from looking like a Muslim, including removing Muslims from the front row of a speech he had. Now that he has been elected he is doing everything he can to distance himself from Christianity.
Combine this with the total diss of the National Day of Prayer, and the people who questioned if Mr. Obama is really a Muslim may have had a point.
Originally posted by RRconservative
reply to post by evil incarnate
The same reason he shunned his middle name (Hussein) when he was campaigning, then on inauguration day he proudly stated it when he was sworn in.
Originally posted by nomorecruelty
No - Barry didn't break any "laws" requesting/demanding that the symbol be covered up.
What he did do though was to trample all over the religious rights of an academic facility.