It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by questioningall
reply to post by TrueAmerican
I agree with you completely, I have thought the same thing.
What gives them the right to play God?
They have no right, they will not be learning anything miraculous.
They have no right to play with every person's life on this planet, as they are! They do not know what will happen.
I thought it was outrageous that people even supported this experiment.
It is not worth any scientific findings that may come out of it - in putting the Earth at jeopardy.
Originally posted by johnsky
Ungh....
Did you people even glance at the source?
IT'S FOX!
Wake me back up when someone credible sources the story.
At least an outlet that doesn't aspire to become a tabloid.
(emphasis mine)
V. CONCLUSIONS
We have studied the evolution in time of microscopic black holes that could be produced at the LHC based on our previous paper [4] and the description of brane-world black holes given in Ref. [8]. With respect to Ref. [4], accretion has now been included in the analysis, and all of the parameters have been chosen so as to cover a fairly comprehensive range of possible outcomes. In particular, our model contains a critical mass scale, Mc, which
is related to the transition from the five-dimensional behavior, effectively described by the metric (6), and the usual four-dimensional description of a black hole. As shown in the previous Section, in particular in Tables I–III, the maximum black hole mass never reaches catastrophic size before leaving the Earth. The black hole mass remains at microscopic values for a wide range of acceptable initial conditions and for a wide range of critical masses, Mc. Indeed, in order for the black holes created at the LHC to grow at all, the critical mass should be Mc & 105 kg. This value is rather close to the maximum compatible with experimental test of Newton’s law, that is Mc ≃ 106 kg (which we further relaxed to Mc = 108 kg in our analysis). For smaller values of Mc, the black holes cannot accrete fast enough to overcome the decay rate. Furthermore, the larger Mc is taken to be, the longer a black hole takes to reach its maximum value and the less time it remains near its maximum value before exiting the Earth. We conclude that, for the RS scenario and black holes described by the metric (6), the growth of black holes to catastrophic size does not seem possible. Nonetheless, it remains true that the expected decay times are much longer (and possibly ≫ 1 sec) than is typically predicted by other models, as was first shown in Ref. [4].
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Essentially it says that their conclusion is that the LHC will NOT produce a viable 'black hole' that could sustain....NOR would it consume the entire planet !!!
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Essentially it says that their conclusion is that the LHC will NOT produce a viable 'black hole' that could sustain....NOR would it consume the entire planet !!!
That's what they say ... this week. Next week it'll be ... 'oops, our math was wrong AGAIN ... So sorry we blew up all of europe.' they don't know what the hell they are doing. That's fine on a small scale. But this is big.
Originally posted by budski
From the article:
"We conclude that ... the growth of black holes to catastrophic size does not seem possible. Nonetheless, it remains true that the expected decay times are much longer (and possibly >> 1 second) than is typically predicted by other models," the three state in a brief paper posted at the scientific discussion Web site ArXiv.org.
source
It makes so much more sense to read the whole article and what was actually said than to rely on a sensationalist headline designed to sell more copy or attract more revenue clicks.
"We conclude that ... the growth of black holes to catastrophic size does not seem possible. Nonetheless, it remains true that the expected decay times are much longer (and possibly >> 1 second) than is typically predicted by other models," the three state in a brief paper posted at the scientific discussion Web site ArXiv.org."
Probably the most glaring, and much hyped error was made during the development of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter. In 1999, just before orbital insertion, a navigation error sent the satellite into an orbit 100 km lower than its intended 150 km altitude above the planet. This error was caused by one of the most expensive measurement incompatibilities in space exploration history. One of NASA's subcontractors, Lockheed Martin, used Imperial units instead of NASA-specified metric units.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Rren
Please look at the last sentence in the last paragraph.
Essentially it says that their conclusion is that the LHC will NOT produce a viable 'black hole' that could sustain....NOR would it consume the entire planet !!!
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Umm, can I ask something?
What in the hell gives any scientist the right to play with the very existence of earth, and some 6 billion lives? If there is any doubt WHATSOEVER that the earth can be destroyed due to this, there is no way, NO WAY this should ever be allowed to happen. PERIOD. It's like wtf.
And there clearly is doubt. If they insist on proceeding with the big test, they ought to be drawn and quartered if need be to STOP this insanity. Some things YOU JUST DON'T PLAY WITH, no matter how bad their stinking curiosity is.
[edit on Tue Jan 27th 2009 by TrueAmerican]
Originally posted by treemanx
Originally posted by questioningall
I agree with you completely, I have thought the same thing.
What gives them the right to play God?
They have no right, they will not be learning anything miraculous.
For those that dont know what this experiment does, for what could be gained from studying it, here it is-
The basic theory is this: Lets say that you wanted to know how a pocket watch worked. But you didnt have the ability to understand its complexity of construction. The LHC will basically smash the pocket watch at extremely high speed, and video tape it blowing apart. Scientists will then review the video, to see how the watch came apart, then rewind it to see how it came back together.
[edit on 28-1-2009 by treemanx]