It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am not going to include a picture of a missile and a picture of a plane, that would be too juvenile.
None, None, None, they don't exist,
Originally posted by stealthAUS
definition of missile:
source oxford online dictonary:
1 an object which is forcibly propelled at a target.
2 a weapon that is self-propelled or directed by remote control, carrying conventional or nuclear explosive.
"an object which is forcibly propelled at a target."
proof that an aeroplane can be used as a missile. some earlier missiles before the design of the crusiform shape liked very much like UAV's with a charge on them.
also in saying that anything from throwing a rock to a dart is classified as a missile.
Originally posted by ANOK
What if they used just ONE device? Have you ever thought of that possibility? You do know of that possibility right?
Originally posted by Lonelypoet
Paxnatus, watch the video which shows the supposed plane that hits the Pentagon, and look at all the videos of the aftermath of the Pentagon, and tell me if you see a tail-section, a wing, a fuselage, an engine, you see "NOTHING!"
*****A PLANE DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON!*****