It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.
Originally posted by pinch
Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.
You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."
Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.
So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.
[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]
Originally posted by Chadwickus
And how can three buildings be gutted and weakened then rigged with hundreds of explosives without anyone noticing?
"Conspiracy theories in general are attempts by people to explain complexity. Instead of acts of God, they become giant conspiracies of all-powerful men...and life is so much more tragically boring and sad than the conspiracy types can handle. So they tell their stories to console themselves about their ignorance. You eat junk, you get fat. It’s as simple as that. Stay away from the junk food." --Thomas Barnett
Originally posted by Trolloks
fine, you saw the planes, but your still avoiding answering the question.
How can 2 planes bring down 3 buildings??
Originally posted by stealthAUS
definition of missile:
source oxford online dictonary:
missile
• noun
1 an object which is forcibly propelled at a target.
2 a weapon that is self-propelled or directed by remote control, carrying conventional or nuclear explosive.
"an object which is forcibly propelled at a target."
proof that an aeroplane can be used as a missile. some earlier missiles before the design of the crusiform shape liked very much like UAV's with a charge on them.
also in saying that anything from throwing a rock to a dart is classified as a missile.
Originally posted by pinch
Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.
You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."
Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.
So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.
[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]
Originally posted by stealthAUS
definition of missile:
source oxford online dictonary:
Originally posted by Project Delta
As for World Trade Center Building #7. This building was "pulled" which is always Firefighter lingo for evacing the building. If I remember correctly Firefighters we're begining suppression of the fires burning through out the building.
1b.) Profanity: You will not use profanity in our forums, and will neither post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by Project Delta
As for World Trade Center Building #7. This building was "pulled" which is always Firefighter lingo for evacing the building. If I remember correctly Firefighters we're begining suppression of the fires burning through out the building.
You don't remember correctly. Actually, you're making it all up. Not only were there no firefighters in WTC 7 the entire afternoon, there was no water pressure and thus no firefighting efforts. But you are right that WTC 7's collapse was highly implausible. It even took NIST 7 years and the creation of a new science principle to explain!
And to think that Larry Silverstein had the authority to "pull" any FDNY firefighters out of any building while at home watching TV is so absurd, it's beyond laughable.
Besides WTC 7, the only thing Silverstein was pulling on 9/11 was his pud while he fantasized about his insurance profits.