Silverstein slips up and says that they pulled WTC 7.

The really don't care if they slip up. They've got away with it. They're all laughing at us.

Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.

You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."

Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.

So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]

That's just semantics.
He messed up.

Why would you call an airplane a missile if 99,9% of all news outlets used the word airplane? Because he's in the military? No, that's not enough reason for me.

Funny that some people still think an airplane did it though...invincible lampposts aren't around yet as far as I know.

Originally posted by pinch
You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."

Come now, pinch. The most active of all imaginations would be the one that tries to define a commercial passenger aeroplane as being a missile.

How often did an ex-pilot, such as yourself, ever refer to any other plane in the sky as a missile?

Active imaginations, indeed...

[edit on 10-1-2009 by tezzajw]

Its ok Tim..we know what you really meant..

"You can fool some of the people some of the time" is what immediately comes to my mind..

S&F

Good One.('')

I for one am awake and see these for what they are....

Wow! The US military has an "eerie" presence on almost every valid thread pertaining to its incompetence.

Thanks TheParadigmShift

It still amazes me that after seeing the so-called pentagon security tapes (actually just 2 frames that show ?), that my local 7-11 has better security cameras!

I struggle to understand people who generally think it was the planes.
Even when i say to them, "2 planes, 3 buildings", then they just look puzzled and shout "al queda"

They dont really care if we find out anymore, its a well known conspiracy, and most likely overtaken the J.F.K in fame.

The point is, no matter what they say or how much they slip up, you will never see a news paper headline saying "9/11 was false flag!"

This is one of the reasons people are getting there news from sites such as this, to get more than just the governments perspective on any manner, or look at something more than just the latest knocked-up celeb.

Thank god for the internet!

I struggle to understand people who generally think it was the planes. Even when i say to them, "2 planes, 3 buildings", then they just look puzzled and shout "al queda"

Do you?!

I SAW THE PLANES WITH MY EYES!

fine, you saw the planes, but your still avoiding answering the question.

How can 2 planes bring down 3 buildings??

nice vid

funny how the first guy tries to correct himself quickly.

Originally posted by Trolloks
fine, you saw the planes, but your still avoiding answering the question.

How can 2 planes bring down 3 buildings??

Yeah i agree, WTC 7 was demolished.

But the no plane theory really makes 911 truth'ers look really stupid.

[edit on 10/1/09 by xstealth]

Amazing how Bush, Rumsfeld, and the 911 commissioner repeat
what the Truth movement has been talking about since 9/11.

Missile no i mean plane. how funny he quickly changed it to plane.

Bush says well place bombs.

Rumsfeld says Shot down.

Where do these people get these theories?

Bunch of nutcases!

[edit on 10-1-2009 by driveshaft08]

[edit on 10-1-2009 by driveshaft08]