I just finished reading this
www.emfj.org...
And have arrived, perhaps circuitiously, at the conclusion that my God emerged through this very framework, or relative to it (to what the Masonic
frame of reference is pointing to ie: The Temple), and performed a great work THE Great Work, or the Magnum Opus of the ages, not allegorically, but
in reality, making the implicit, explicite, and in the process, transcending it. Furthermore, Jesus did do this, outside of the Temple, and I'm
thinking here of his exchange with the woman at the well, where he re-framed God in the context of the spirit of the universe, relative neighter to
the temple, nor the mountain, but in fact, to himself, and from that perspective, relative to everyone and to the brotherhood of man, yes, even across
religious traditions. He became the Temple of the Living God, and then offered himself up a sacrifice for one and for many.
But Jesus is still "the man" depicted ultimately, the builder, and he is both innerant and transcendant and self referrencial, and cosmological.
Someone like me would interpret the whole thing in fact through a Judeo-Christian frame of reference. Jesus was in my view the ultimate master of
these mysteries, and went through a discovery process himself as to his own true nature, but his relationship with God was not through mere allegory,
or even via the Jewish frame of reference only, for he was a Jewish Mystic of the highest order, unto the very Godhead itself, and he identified
himself honestly as such, where true humility may be considered the honest expression of one's true self. For His was an INTIMITE relationship with
the spirit of the living God. In other words, by divine proportion and extension, Jesus the man, was, to Jesus Son of God, as Jesus Son of God was to
God the Father, and in fact the First Father of all Creation. And I believe in Jesus. But I do not view Jesus in fundamenalist literalist terms by any
means.
But where we're dealing in the ancient mystery traditions, we are most assuredly dealing in religious terms and frames of reference, there is no
denying that.
[edit on 6-1-2009 by OmegaPoint]