Whats going on at yellowstone?, page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 478 times


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:00 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by spinkyboo



spinkyboo, I appreciate your intent, but really....IF the major eruption that may occur at the 'Yellowstone' location should happen, there is really nothing that modern society could do to prepare.

There would be massive starvation, not just in North America, but around the World as the dust and pumice clouds were carried by the upper winds.

This devastation would likely last for generations....not just a year or two....generations. A massive volcanic event WILL affect the entire planet, for years and years. AND, there will be a 'domino effect', as eco-systems fail, one after the other.

Point is: We are powerless, even with all of our technology, to prevent a major volcanic eruption. IF it is large enough, it will be catastrophic. It might not wipe out all life, but will likely devastate most species....including us.


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:04 AM by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by weedwhacker



Yep your absolutely right....

But what else is there to do besides discuss it on a discussion board?

We all know this would be a devastating event, but its human nature to talk about our impending doom(s).


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:08 AM by redhatty
reply to post by weedwhacker



If knowing that it was happening and NOT being in the immediate "dead zone" was your fate, if and when it happens, then you have time to hug your children and parents more before your end, you have a chance to love your fellow man and help one another before your end.

Who knows, if you happen to live around highly intelligent people of diverse genres, you might even devise a way to survive long enough for the worst to pass.

Then maybe, just maybe, you - or your descendants - could start anew



reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:11 AM by redhatty
reply to post by fleabit



I'm still looking into it, but what I have found so far is that most swarm activity occurs on the edges of the caldera, not in Lake Yellowstone, and I have yet to find (so far) a swarm in the region of Lake Yellowstone that consisted of 22 quakes all withing a 2 mile radius.

So while it may still be in the records, I haven't found it yet.

But so far, this does seem to be an unusual swarm activity


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:12 AM by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by fleabit



Actually there has been no swarms in this particular section.

USGS said there were swarms in the area in the past, but looking back you can't find any for this part.. only the general park region.

If you had read full thread, this you would know.

The largest swarm was only 8-12 in a period as well, we are sitting at 21 right now.

It is an area of interest.
It is something that will eventually rear its ugly head.

Fear mongering, no.. discussing events as they happen, yes. You have to remember this is still an ongoing event.


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:13 AM by Curious_Agnostic
reply to post by fleabit



I feel that even if this is normal, it's not "everyday normal". When this thing finally blows, there will probably be a swarm, so anytime it's acting up like this, it couldn't hurt to keep an eye on things. The idea of that monster shaking concerns me, even if it's happened before, and the seismograph looks like a colorful nightmare right now.


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:15 AM by redhatty
copied from glp


23 of them so far.

MAG DATE LOCAL-TIME LAT LON DEPTH LOCATION
y/m/d h:m:s deg deg km

2.5 2008/12/28 22:30:04 44.507N 110.371W 0.8 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.2 2008/12/28 22:23:37 44.511N 110.369W 1.2 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.9 2008/12/28 21:29:18 44.522N 110.385W 1.0 59 km (37 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.9 2008/12/28 21:25:54 44.504N 110.364W 0.6 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.2 2008/12/28 16:57:57 44.509N 110.372W 0.9 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.0 2008/12/28 16:08:25 44.491N 110.390W 1.7 60 km (37 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.2 2008/12/28 12:55:17 44.499N 110.350W 0.4 63 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.6 2008/12/28 12:32:15 44.511N 110.352W 0.3 62 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.4 2008/12/28 08:37:41 44.523N 110.370W 0.4 60 km (37 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.2 2008/12/28 02:23:57 44.505N 110.363W 0.4 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.2 2008/12/28 00:15:19 44.487N 110.358W 0.4 62 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.1 2008/12/27 23:37:20 44.491N 110.383W 0.2 60 km (37 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.4 2008/12/27 22:23:54 44.490N 110.360W 1.9 62 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.8 2008/12/27 22:15:56 44.492N 110.365W 0.2 62 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.6 2008/12/27 17:08:50 44.493N 110.354W 0.4 62 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.2 2008/12/27 15:30:03 44.495N 110.367W 0.2 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.4 2008/12/27 13:26:27 44.488N 110.365W 0.3 62 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
3.5 2008/12/27 13:17:32 44.481N 110.362W 0.7 62 km (39 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.3 2008/12/27 11:56:35 44.484N 110.367W 0.5 62 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.8 2008/12/27 11:23:07 44.490N 110.369W 0.1 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.5 2008/12/27 10:01:07 44.484N 110.367W 0.2 62 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.6 2008/12/27 09:30:53 44.497N 110.368W 0.4 61 km (38 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.5 2008/12/22 19:07:25 44.630N 110.995W 6.0 9 km ( 6 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT


Notice how more of them are getting progressively deeper over time and that the initial tumbler even though it only registered at 0.5 was at 6.0km in depth... It would seem to me that with these being so close to the surface we are seeing cold water from the lake seep into the cracks produced and it is slowly coming into contact with the magma or heated rock and producing deeper quakes over time.

If the initial quake was at 6.0km, it would seem that with all of the water seeping in from these shallower quakes that they would keep going until they hit that 6.0km mark so you have to ask...what is at that 6km mark? Is it a solid heated rock formation or, is it magma, if it is magma and the super cooled winter water hits it then it would seem natural that it would literally "let of a little steam".


A very interesting thing to ponder, IMO


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:15 AM by TrueAmerican
reply to post by redhatty



good bud, find us a 22 so I can go to bed... 8 swarm best anyone has come up with yet in 2004.

edit: also, that first one claiming to be part of this swarm streak happened 5 days before, so I'm not sure it really justifies what he is saying.

22 includes only those from 12/27 on.

[edit on 29-12-2008 by TrueAmerican]


reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:28 AM by redhatty
reply to post by TrueAmerican



Sorry my friend, even back in 1984 when there was a period of 100+ tremors a day, they did not have them all in one spot, nor did any one spot that they did occur in have 23.

Best I've been able to deduce is that while "swarms" are common, what they actually mean is that a bunch of individual quakes/tremors happen within a specific amount of time.

ALL of them happening in the same spot like what we are seeing happen has not been recorded, that I can find at least.
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Human Seismograph Says: Big Earthquake Eminent
  Posted 19 days ago with 90 member flags
An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 6 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 1 days ago with 60 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 11 days ago with 46 member flags
Indian state says it\'s OK now to kill tiger poachers on sight
  Posted 3 days ago with 41 member flags