Originally posted by violenttorrent
You're the plaintiff. I'm just asking a question: Do Nuclear Bombs Exist? Maybe you need to watch NUKE LIES again for a clarification of my
I feel like parroting many others here, but YOU are the plaintiff since you challenge the commonly accepted reality. Anyway, I even made the effort
and watched your little video collage a 2nd time. And the basic verdict is: your video criticism is mostly baseless, and the rest is purely
Lets analyze your "brilliant" examination of the tree footage. I´ll give some time cues and quote your statements:
1:10 "Take a look at these trees...now what was that? and who turned the camera?"
Umm... the pan shot was from a normal speed camera. Then the footage cuts to a DIFFERENT, a high-speed camera. thats whats happening, and noone
"turned the camera".
1:20 "They´re in awfully straight lines, aren´t they?"
I hope you do know these tests were made in the middle of a DESERT plain, right? Desert plains are not exactly the places where you will find forests.
That measn someone PUT them there for the test. And artificial forests tend not be naturally grown.
1:24 "Now this must be a different blast ´cos its coming from a different direction."
Well, let me be the first to introduce you to the magic of MULTIPLE CAMERA ANGLES. Do you honestly believe they put up only one camera to film the
most expensive experiment in history?
1:57 "And then they show us, what looks to be a real forest, has been chopped down or torn down or something."
When was the last time you were in a real forest? Notice something missing in that picture? Undergrowth. This is the same desert plain with the same
evenly spaced trees, you can even see the rolling hills in the distance. And it looks neither chopped nor torn down, these trees are clearly blown
apart by a powerful blast. Look at pictures from heavily shelled WW1 forests for reference.
2:37 "These frames were cut together - why?"
Because the light picture shows normal speed footage and the dark picture is from the aforementioned high speed camera. You know, an explosion and
nuclear chain reaction happens a LITTLE bit too quick for the human eye to register.
2:44 "Then this frame was cut to...this which looks like the sun to me..."
No it doesnt. You can see that the blast at first is a circular shape and then expands into a half circle. It still is little bit pointy towards the
top, which is an effect of the lower density in greater heights, so the blast can more easily expand vertically than horizontally. If it were the sun
it must have been at least perfectly semi-circular, if not even broader at the horizon because of athmospheric light diffraction.
6:11 "Everything gets blown everywhichway except for the camera".
You´re kidding me. With sufficient steel and concrete you can make the Statue of Liberty blast resistant. Of course you can then make a blast
resistant camera housing. In fact, as these were pre-digital imagery cameras, how do suppose the filmstock survived the tests without sufficient
protection? Theories are only valid when you think them through, my friend.
Oh, and the last gem:
7:03 "And why don´t they call them nuclear bombs anymore?"
Because weapons of mass destruction are not only nuclear but also chemical and biological weapons, genius.
Anyway, I could go on, but your video pretty much makes it clear that you are not really interested in factbased discussion of your opinion anyway.
You have your set ideas about the Great Satan, and fabricated your nice and cozy nuclear hoax theory around it. Of course one can question anything. I
can question electricity for example. Is it possibly just a hoax and its actually the harvested souls of Siamese twins that are powering my Toaster? I
mean, has anyone ever SEEN electricity?
C´mon, try harder.
[edit on 5/1/2009 by Lonestar24]