Ancient Extraterrestrials, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 177 times


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:10 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by anti72
reply to
post by Skyfloating



sorry, this is NO EVIDENCE.
NO PROVE.
books and hearsay.


Däniken wrote bestsellers bacause he was a broke hotelier these days. dont forget that.



This is not something Daniken discovered. Its something I discovered. And have proven. Right here. On ATS. Learn to read.

Since you are calling the Evidence I posted hearsay I must conclude that you are not interested in it.

[edit on 4-12-2008 by Skyfloating]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:16 PM by lifeform
Originally posted by anti72
Originally posted by Turiddu
reply to
post by Skyfloating



Its not a matter of spiritual belief or whatever, the fact is that there exists no evidence to suggest that these ancient gods were extraterrestrials.



besides, there is more scientific proof of spiritual science than of aliens.
just think of the old australian painings (´gods´,´astronauts´)
it is plausible that these shamans had strong inner visions of the astral level.


it depends wether you believe spiritual things need landing strips, and the power of flight and always come down from the havens or stars and then decend back to the havens. how anyone can rule out something coming to earth via space is puzzling.

this is their accounts, their recorded accounts, but because it dos'nt fit your belief system you simply go "they were talking rubbish"

the thing you need to understand is nobody in the present day is saying they were aliens, we are just understanding what the ancients said, the ancients are the ones claiming they came from the skies and stars.

the way modern day science copes with that is by ignoring what the people of that time were saying and putting down to myth.

yet anything they said that matches our idea of history is taken as fact.
its the classic cherry picking of evidence to dictate who the ancients were and what happened.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:16 PM by anti72
reply to post by Skyfloating




please stop getting personal.
thanks.

I know those books. the authors all try to freely INTERPRET geological finds and datings FOR THEIR OWN PORPOSE and want to present it as´proof´in
an´popular-scientific way´.

its about book sellings. right?
ask Däniken.




reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:19 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by anti72
reply to
post by Skyfloating




please stop getting personal.
thanks.

I know those books. the authors all try to freely INTERPRET geological finds and datings FOR THEIR OWN PORPOSE and want to present it as´proof´in
an´popular-scientific way´.

its about book sellings. right?
ask Däniken.


Again, the Aborigine-"Myth" was not something discovered by Daniken, but by me. You will find a link to it in the opening post.

I will now end this discussion with you because it actually insults my intelligence.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:19 PM by lifeform
Originally posted by anti72
reply to
post by Skyfloating




please stop getting personal.
thanks.

I know those books. the authors all try to freely INTERPRET geological finds and datings FOR THEIR OWN PORPOSE and want to present it as´proof´in
an´popular-scientific way´.

its about book sellings. right?
ask Däniken.


you do know you can buy books on any subject right? why is it about book sales when it is a book you disagree with?

[edit on 4-12-2008 by lifeform]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:25 PM by anti72
reply to post by lifeform



well, I liked those books actually. Däniken, Berlitz..all those classics..
but now I dont think they could be right.



[edit on 4-12-2008 by anti72]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:36 PM by warrenb
reply to post by Skyfloating



or doesn't fit into their agenda's or dogmatic religious views


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:39 PM by lifeform
Originally posted by anti72
reply to
post by lifeform



well, I liked those books actually. Däniken, Berlitz..all those classics..
but now I dont think they could be right.



[edit on 4-12-2008 by anti72]


your missing the point, book sales have nothing to do with how true or wrong something is. i really do not understand the logic of some sceptic's when they use book sales as evidence against information.

ALL books are written and produced for the purpose of selling books.

it dos'nt mean anything. even books your believe to be true are written and made for the purpose of book sales.

i wish some sceptics would stop using that logic, that books sales = disinfo.
it's not even logical to believe unless you believe ALL books to be disinfo based on their ability to sell, including accepted science books.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:40 PM by anti72
reply to post by Skyfloating



just one example.
why the hell is an old depiction of an winged disc ..just an UFO?

generations of ´AAT-believers´ make the same old thinking mistakes.
one of them, they mistake/interprete storytelling as precise technical description, even´evidence´.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:42 PM by warrenb
Here's some info on Nan Madol in the Pacific



www.thevillagehotel.com...

The oral history of Pohnpei says that Nan Madol was built by two brothers - Olosipa and Olosopa. According to an old story, these brothers sailed their ships along the coast of the Americas, and traded with the natives. When trading was finished at the equator, the westward sail across the Pacific was difficult because the ships couldn’t carry enough food and water for the trip.




[edit on 4-12-2008 by warrenb]



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:43 PM by Skyfloating
Originally posted by anti72
reply to
post by Skyfloating



just one example.
why the hell is an old depiction of an winged disc ..just an UFO?




Ah...so after two pages of generalizations, you actually address a specific point brought up?

Well, in that case Im happy to talk with you.

A winged disc depicted men sitting in it, being called "Gods" by the ancients...could, might be...just that: A flying craft with a man sitting in it.

No?


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:43 PM by Zepherian
reply to post by Skyfloating



It's cognitive dissonance. It's starting to become more common on even mainstream media, where they say one thing and then it's opposite and leave the viewer, listener, reader, hanging. The goal of the concept is not only to cause confusion but to actually erode knowledge and create, over time, a dumbed down serveant class, even more than what has been created now. It's a commonly referred part of the NWO conspiracy.

The people who ignore or even fly in the face of evidence are either professional debunkers on an elitist agenda or younger, dumber, people who have been victims of it and don't know right from wrong anymore.

The good news is this will bite them in the ass, because besides breaking knowledge they also break memetic control mechanisms, allowing experimental human beings the opportunity to rebuild truer belief systems, which will make the ones they sponsor redundant. This is a cleansing process that will take time.

Sorry for this hijack of your thread, but I've seen this behaviour all over ATS, especially with chemtrails, which imo are the easiest to prove/experience, of the conspiracy theories, but you always get these semirational theoretical debunker types flying in the face of experience. If there is more solid evidence of the paleocontact hypothesis you can bet the controllers don't want it, because it breaks their own myths, so it will be actively repressed by everyone from jesuits to investment bankers. The last thing these people want is people who ask questions... they want people than just accept their answers.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:46 PM by Skyfloating
reply to post by Zepherian



Im starting to believe it, man. Ive rarely seen anything like this


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:47 PM by anti72
reply to post by lifeform



no, perhaps you didnt get it . these authors produce those books in spite they know its rubbish, of course.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 07:49 PM by anti72
reply to post by Skyfloating



you are asking a question ?

where is the proof of an ..er UFO ?
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 8 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 17 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 2 days ago with 27 member flags