It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No one has stated yet a logical reason why two adult gays cannot marry? Based on a belief system
Civil unions between male couples existed around 600 years ago in medieval Europe, a historian now says.
...
For example, he found legal contracts from late medieval France that referred to the term "affrèrement," roughly translated as brotherment. Similar contracts existed elsewhere in Mediterranean Europe, Tulchin said.
In the contract, the "brothers" pledged to live together sharing "un pain, un vin, et une bourse," (that's French for one bread, one wine and one purse). The "one purse" referred to the idea that all of the couple's goods became joint property. Like marriage contracts, the "brotherments" had to be sworn before a notary and witnesses, Tulchin explained. www.msnbc.msn.com...
One of the recurring clichés of the same-sex marriage debate is that the very notion of such a thing is a radical departure from anything entertained before in human history. Nothing, however, could be further from the truth. In many cultures and in many eras, the issue has emerged-and the themes of the arguments are quirkily similar. Same-sex love, as Plato's Symposium shows, is as ancient as human love, and the question of how it is recognized and understood has bedeviled every human civilization. In most, it has never taken the form of the modern institution of marriage, but in some, surprisingly, it has. In seventeenth-century China and nineteenth-century Africa, for example, the institution seems identical to opposite-sex marriage.
...
In Native American society, marriage between two men was commonplace, but its similarity to contemporary lesbian and gay marriages is far from evident. And today in a number of foreign countries, laws extending civil marriage to gay and lesbian couples have been or will soon be enacted. Judge for yourself what this might mean for our current convulsion. One thing emerges clearly: this issue is not a modern invention.
...
What follows is from an eleventh-century Greek manuscript labeled Grottaferrata G.B.), and I have inserted some of the significant original Greek words in transcription.
Office for Same-Sex Union www.enotalone.com...
Originally posted by Jemison
Gay's are allowed to have 'civil unions' and all of the 'rights' that come with marriage are contained in 'civil unions'. Why are they insisting that their relationship be defined as 'marriage'?
Originally posted by Jemison
What percentage of the population is gay?
If two men or two women are able to physically reproduce
Gay couples raise families; I believe the number of them raising children has risen to 44% in the US this last decade.
Originally posted by Jemison
reply to post by rapinbatsisaltherage
Gay couples raise families; I believe the number of them raising children has risen to 44% in the US this last decade.
Weren't there some states that just voted on if gay couples should be allowed to adopt or foster children? And didn't they vote that gay couples should NOT be allowed to do so?
I am opposed to gay marriage and there is nothing you can say that will change my mind. I used to have a very 'live and let live' attitude in regard to homosexuality but those days are over.
I have four daughters, ages 10, 9, 7 and 7 who were forced to learn about homosexuality last summer. My twins were 6 when gay marriage became 'legal' in California. I resent the fact that my daughters were exposed to homosexuality ... heck, sexuality of ANY kind, at such a young age. What people do in their own homes is their business but when you want to scream from the rooftops that you are practicing an alternative life style and you are exposing MY children to it, you have just earned my disgust and resentment and do not for one minute expect me to have any type of sympathy or understanding for your cause.
Jemison
Originally posted by Jemison
If you are living in Cali and you don't like it, move to MA. Stop wasting the CA taxpayers money on this stuff.
Jemison
Originally posted by Jemison
reply to post by Jezus
Hmm, I think you should be able to figure out why.
Why should one be more accepted or tolerated than another? Isn't tolerance what people are saying this is all about??
I would like to hear why people should be more tolerant of one behavior over another.
Jemison
Aha , but its okay to tell children how jesus was whipped to within an inch of his life then nailed to a cross so he could die a slow and agonising death ? Its okay to describe gross roman brutality because America is based on the roman empire . yeah thats okay .
Tolerance for things that have no negative externalities and only involve consenting adults.
Look , if a kid is gay he's gay , if your daughters gay you can cry all you want about how 'dirty' it is but honey , if thats how they are hard wired there's nothing you or god can do about it .
Well if sonme mammals do then who cares...you just havent explained as to whats so wrong and the reasoning behind your statement
So if youre ok w/ your kids ending up gay or ppl choosing or born w/ it..then whats not to agree about marriage...way to high strung on something you are scared and homophobic about....get a grip and relax...born or not...you said u would not love your child any less than think about that
Originally posted by Jemison
reply to post by Jezus
Tolerance for things that have no negative externalities and only involve consenting adults.
So multiple husbands or mutiple wives should be legal, correct?
Jemison