posted on Nov, 2 2008 @ 04:42 PM
I'd like to add a specific example: The government conducted "simulations" of the collapse of the WTC Towers.
In all of the modeling, they claim that fires fanned by jet fuel either weakened the steel, or caused connection points to weaken, leading to the
collapse of the towers.
Yet, I wonder: How do these "experts" KNOW how much FUEL was left after the HUGE fireballs witnessed by EVERYONE upon the planes impacting the
towers??? How do they model the unknown??
That is the standard retort from the "there is no evidence of C.D. on the towers": jet fuel fires weakened the towers, causing collapse.
I mean, they (the government experts and the "Truthers") say 10,000 gals (approx.) were left in the planes when they reached NYC.
Ok, I'll go with that.
But then, knowing as I do that 10,000 gals of jet fuel weigh @ 30+ tons, and knowing from experience that when you impact something like a building
with a plane EVERYTHING aft flies FORWARD (you have braked your car suddenly, and had everything in the rear window ledge fly into the front seat, or
had the passengers jerk forward??? same same). This is EXACTLY what MY EYES see happening with the fireballs: 10,000 gallons of fuel igniting OUTSIDE
the towers, being thrown forward upon impact. So, I have to ask:
WHAT FUEL are these "experts" modeling their conclusions upon? Looked to me like it ALL ignited and burned up OUTSIDE the towers.
Certainly, with 10,000 gallons fitting into a space the size of one small office, no one is claiming there was enough left to WEAKEN these HUGE
SKYSCRAPERS, are there??? More likely you could melt a locomotive with a spoonful of kerosene, same proportion.
Or, were all the TV news services showing FAKE fireballs? I don't think so.
Also, in the government sponsored Purdue University "simulation", they made a video (on youtube, btw) showing the computer simulated impact of the
jet into the tower: The nose, or cockpit, shatters into a million pieces immediately upon entry into tower. Like anyone with a modicum of intelligence
YET, the REAL LIFE VIDEO of the impact SHOWS an UNDAMAGED nose emerge from the other side of the tower....then "explodes."
But, googling "bird damage on Boeing jets" photos will show you photo after photo of HOLES in Boeing jets caused by BIRDS....yet they will pass
through aluminum and steel UNHARMED? Those must be some tough ol' birds.....How did the nose pass through undamaged in the VIDEOS???
Answer: it couldn't have. Yet SOMETHING is on video. I call that an AS YET unexplained event.
I need answers I am not hearing from the "experts", so I question WHAT I SEE on video.
All I see is quite consistent with guilty people covering their tracks....with msm complicity. In fact, at times, they are much less convincing then
OJ was with his "Columbian Hitmen" BS.
Like this great post states.