posted on Oct, 25 2008 @ 02:46 AM
This idea that his use of the word 'Illuminati' is in reference to some generalized concept of the 'banking elite' would ONLY make sense if
someone, ANYONE could show us just 1 example of that word being used in a similar reference by someone such as himself ( ie, an insider, which this
guy most def. is), Ever.
I'm sorry, but I think that is really reaching.
This term is NEVER used by folks that would be interviewed on CNBC, Bloomberg, etc. They KNOW better. Until now, apparently.
I believe this mention of the word in this context is very disconcerting & we should all be moved by it's relevance. Don't buy anyone trying to
belittle this development, esp if it comes from any new posters, as I've seen already.
There most definitely are different branches of this group (they don't use the term Illuminati for themselves, & in fact are more like their own
sub-culture than a secret society) & the European version are quite different than the American version, esp THESE DAYS.
I don't know as much as I may be implying by my post (though more than most), I just know that my grandfather as a 30 yr A.F. intelligence officer
has had to deal with some of these folks off & on over the years. My own research has lead me to believe that there have been factional developments
which are not part of whatever original plan they've been following. Similar to different mob families 'changing the script' as developments change
the current scenario.
All I'm going to say, is that I think it's a pretty ominous development. & a surprising one.. one that has a meaning.