Snap Out of It - Obama is using Clinical Hypnosis on You!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times
Topic started on 17-10-2008 @ 11:40 PM by SkipShipman
AN EXAMINATION OF OBAMA’S USE OF HIDDEN HYPNOSIS TECHNIQUES IN HIS SPEECHES

EXPOSING OBAMA’S DECEPTION MAY BE THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY

This document contains over 60 pages of evidence and analysis proving Barack Obama’s use of a little-known and highly deceptive and manipulative form of “hack” hypnosis on millions of unaware Americans, and reveals what only a few psychologists and hypnosis/NLP experts know.

Barack Obama’s speeches contain the hypnosis techniques of Dr. Milton Erickson, M.D. who developed a form of “conversational” hypnosis that could be hidden in seemingly normal speech and used on patients without their knowledge for therapy purposes. Obama’s speeches intentionally contain:

- Trance Inductions
- Hypnotic Anchoring
- Pacing and Leading
- Pacing, Distraction and Utilization
- Critical Factor Bypass
- Stacking Language Patterns
- Preprogrammed Response Adaptation
- Linking Statements/ Causality Bridges
- Secondary Hidden Meanings/Imbedded
Suggestions
- Emotion Transfer
- Non-Dominant Hemisphere Programming

Obama’s techniques are the height of deception and psychological manipulation, remaining hidden because one must understand the science behind the language patterns in order to spot them. This document examines Obama’s speeches word by word, hand gesture by hand gesture, tone, pauses, body language, and proves his use of covert hypnosis intended only for licensed therapists on consenting patients. Obama’s mesmerized, cult-like, grade-school-crush-like worship by millions is not because “Obama is the greatest leader of a generation” who simply hasn’t accomplished anything, who magically “inspires” by giving speeches. Obama is committing perhaps the biggest fraud and deception in American history.


Please read the article, it is very specific on the techniques. Especially interesting is how the Supreme Court ruled on a confession gained through hypnosis. The point is where speech writers and Obama work together and know what they are doing. They have studied the literature and they are applying it even though it is supposed to be the province of psychology and psychiatry under the greatest care for their patients.

For that matter if you must, go ahead and vote for Obama, just recognize what he is doing between the lines. Once you get past that, vote for the substance of what he wants to do, not because you are emotionally compelled to do so. If you must vote for McCain, apply the same principles.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 06:47 AM by Anonymous ATS




reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 07:53 AM by Mayacara
reply to post by silo13


I couldn't agree more.

These techniques are used by lots of politicians - just listen to any of Tony Blair's speeches - and more worryingly by most salesmen.

I learnt hypnosis years ago and only use it when I have to, for instance if someone is hurt or distressed and need to be calmed down. There is a huge misconception about it where people think you can make someone do anything you want them to. Well, you can't make anyone do anything that goes against their conscience, so all you Obama haters out there won't stop hating him just because he gives a good speech using these techniques. In fact, if he is talking about things you disagree with, his ability to enable you to understand what he is saying will probably make you disagree even more vehemently!

Instead of moaning about these techniques being used "against" you, I suggest you go and educate yourself about them, you never know, you might pick up some good tips and avoid being talked into buying that insurance policy you really don't need!

Cheers


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 08:39 AM by pk1yen
reply to post by SonicInfinity




That is one of the funniest things I've ever read on here - seriously.

The sad thing is ... I can no longer tell when people are joking about this sort of stuff.

As for this "hypnosis" nonsense - it's called speech writing. Simple as that.
People really need to stop over-reacting - it's a form of persuasion, nothing more.

This whole election has degraded into a slagging match between two sides blindly supporting each others candidate against "the other one".
This is what happens with politics, when you separate a society into "us" and "them" - people desperately seeking ways for them to look superior, or for the other "side" to look worse. There is no "us" and "them" - there is a group of people with a gradient of political beliefs, separated into two sides because there is no other simple way of doing it.
People need to realise this - grow up - and start thinking for themselves.

This is bordering on dangerous - that people are so desperate for "their" team to be on top that they'll make up and misrepresent whatever nonsense supports their cause, or damages the other side's.


America is terrifying.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 09:18 AM by grover
reply to post by SkipShipman



I don't know which is more pathetic... that you are using this as an excuse as to why Obama is going to win.... or the people who would believe it.

Obama is going to win because people want change and after 12 out of the past 14 years in control of congress and the past 8 in the White House people don't believe that the Republicans can deliver anything other than more of the same.

Nothing more, nothing less.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 09:25 AM by TruthTellist
reply to post by pk1yen



Unfortunately you did not read what the Doctor wrote.

If you had, you would not have made the statements in your last post.

The Doctor isn't even an American. Not many of us are.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 09:28 AM by Ian McLean
Originally posted by pk1yen
reply to
post by SonicInfinity



As for this "hypnosis" nonsense - it's called speech writing. Simple as that.
People really need to stop over-reacting - it's a form of persuasion, nothing more.


This quote from the linked paper would seem to support that point of view:

The reason you cry from reading sad book simply by reading ink on paper is because of the mind’s interaction with that information, which is also a hypnotic process.


How broadly can 'hypnotic process' be defined (and, I would note, emphasized in bold on the header and footer of every page)? Simple advertising technique.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 09:28 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by SonicInfinity



The reason Obama "speaks differently" is that he is using cohesive arguments, rational thought and complete sentences. Certainly unlike Palin and even sometimes McCain.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 15 days ago with 10 member flags
pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 106 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 69 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies