Snap Out of It - Obama is using Clinical Hypnosis on You!, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:21 PM by ExquisitExamplE
reply to post by Stormdancer777



Pretty amazing right? Notice how he keeps saying how he is "afraid of taking the subway (blank money)". Then he says, whilst handing him the money "But my friend just told me to go ahead and take it (blank money), it's fine, it's fine."

Crafty fellow, this is the modern day equivalent of the jedi mind trick. I still can't fathom how you could just let someone walk out of your store with a $4500 ring. Of course, I'd like to think my intellectual capacity would easily allow myself to fend off his deception.

As far as Obama and McCain go... Well... These aren't the droids I'm looking for.

[edit on 10/18/2008 by ExquisitExamplE]



reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:25 PM by solo32_98
Originally posted by redhatty
To the posters here who are saying... Conversational Hypnosis, SO WHAT? No big deal, I don't care, etc.

Could you please explain why you can say that?

I mean seriously. You are saying Yes, sure he is hypnotizing crowds at his rallies, and over the TV in his speeches (not debates so much though). And "I" see nothing wrong with that. It's the way things are done, all over.

Heck, if McDonalds does subliminal messaging, they are gonna get slammed by the FCC - because it is illegal

But a rising star politician, who really has done NOTHING significant in his career except go for the next highest job position, can use techniques that are supposed to be only for clinical professionals to hypnotize massive amounts of people, and you think it's OKAY?


You're kidding, right?
Did you ever take debate class in high school? Have you ever had to write an essay? Do you read the newspaper?
Every single point of view ever taken by a person is either expressed effectively or it is not.
Obama is an EFFECTIVE speaker and orator. He is inspired during his speeches because he is passionate about what he believes in. he genuinely believes that he can lead America away from the madness that engulfs it, currently. Hopefully he can. But from some of the posts in this thread, it is apparent that it's a losing battle. Fighting the ignorance and fear that is supporting the republican party right now is a monumental task.
Obama happens to be far more literate and intelligent than anyone else in the public spotlight right now. I believe this scares a lot of people and causes them to come up with the craziest of assumptions.

I do ask all Americans: "What is wrong with having an intelligent Harvard grad for a president?"
I encourage you to reach for and accept someone smarter and greater than what you have settled for over the past 8 years. You deserve better than McCain/Palin!!


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:30 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by Mayacara



You need to read the whole article. There are certain steps in the conversational hypnosis process that are used. "Lots of politicians" do not use them, including Tony Blair, who is a very good public speaker.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:38 PM by MagicaRose
reply to post by SkipShipman



If he is doing this , why is it that some people are not affected by it?

From the first day I heard him speak I've not liked him at all.



reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 03:50 PM by solomons path
reply to post by MagicaRose



To fall for the hypnosis (again noting that EVERY public/media figure employs these tactics) one must remained focused on the speaker. If you are distracted, busy, biased, etc . . . you don't fall for the methods employed. But, again, this is not something unique to Obama . . .


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 04:10 PM by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by solomons path
reply to
post by MagicaRose



To fall for the hypnosis (again noting that EVERY public/media figure employs these tactics) one must remained focused on the speaker. If you are distracted, busy, biased, etc . . . you don't fall for the methods employed. But, again, this is not something unique to Obama . . .



Once again people believe what they want to believe,

I was never one to trust, at age four I learned never trust anyone.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 04:21 PM by solomons path
reply to post by Stormdancer777



I've never claimed hypnosis = belief . . . two separate issues altogether. You're in a hypnotic state every time you're engrossed in a movie . . . that's why suspense and suprise is effective. It temporarily rattles you from this "sleep". Most people walk around all day in a hypnotic state . . . that's why they're suprised easily when a door slams or some cuts around the corner in front of them. The mind is on auto-pilot. However, when in this state people are more open to suggestion, but that doesn't mean they "buy in". Unfortunately, 87% of the population (any) are followers . . . so, they do fall for the rhetoric.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 04:30 PM by Narnia
Originally posted by MagicaRose
reply to
post by SkipShipman



If he is doing this , why is it that some people are not affected by it?

From the first day I heard him speak I've not liked him at all.



From what I understand, it affects only a portion of people... I have had an aversion to his rhetoric as well. I turn the TV off, or change the channel when Obama is on. Then again, I moved around quite a bit as a child, into very different cultures, so I have always been immune to group behavior. I see things from the outside looking in, even at sports games I feel uncomfortable joining in on the collective cheering.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 04:49 PM by Anonymous ATS
wow, an anonymous expose fit for the national enquirer! it's rhetoric that fails in ethos and logos. it fails me on pathos too, but it may persuade you.

a couple reasons why it failed as an ethical and logical piece:

1. fails to disclose who wrote or what qualifications they have.

how are they capable of making such conclusions? people can read medical text, but if that's all they've done, for them to claim they can perform surgery is quackery. the author here goes on to make their own interpretations based on others guidelines. unless they are qualified to do so, they are to get professional and expert opinion instead, because amateurs get it wrong a lot.

2. passes soft sciences and hypothesis as undeniable proof

reliance on soft sciences like body language interpretations are as admissible in court as graphologist's handwriting interpretation - they're not. there is another standard, and that standard is found through forensic document analysis.

3. manipulates statements of experts

the author quotes tonya reiman and says tilting the head to the right is manipulative. the quoted expert actually says to do it! it's about as manipulative as getting a nice haircut. presidential candidates have professional speech writers, stylists, and advisers of all sorts telling them what to do. if that's shocking, what about them wearing makeup on tv??!!!

i get the impression that the paper uses uses its own manipulative techniques to further it's own agenda. like a thief warning me about another "thief" to distract me and steal my goods.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 04:55 PM by ExquisitExamplE
reply to post by 12.21.12



Yes, I have looked into reverse speech, and here are my thoughts: Everything means something. Simple right? Hardly. Seeking truth is one of the most difficult tasks one may undertake. Our world is woven so intricately that cause and effect become one and the same. This is why there are certain fields such as numerology, synchromysticism, etc... That may appear as psuedo-science, but in reality are sciences encompassing functions not yet comprehendable by the science of today.



Deeper and deeper the weave is the sleeper.


reply posted on 18-10-2008 @ 05:19 PM by PuRe EnErGy
Before you all go too crazy, .. (I've been studying NLP for a number of years) as well as clinical and covert hypnosis.

Most of this stuff is done by everyone unconsciously.

Milton Hyland Erickson is a genius.

First and foremost, .. it's great to be aware of these techniques.

Can they be used on you unknowingly? sure, almost anyone can LIE to you to your face.

You're making Milton sound like he's a criminal, and you are so erroneous about that it isn't even funny.

I really want to write a novel here explaining that yes, it can be used in the manner you are describing BUT and a BIG BUT, it isn't going to work on everyone.

Another thing, he is not using clinical hypnosis on anyone.

He is using hypnotic language and transformational grammar.

I also want to add that this IS NOT NEW, politicians have been using these methods for YEARS and YEARS, Obama isn't the first one to be using this information considering it is much more than 30 YEARS old (unlike NLP) which was started in the early to mid 1970's.

I personally have some interesting videos on my website that explain/detail NLP for those who don't know what it is.... don't just sit here and read this and go blabbing to your friends about something you know nothing about, if this intrigues you, GO READ, Milton Erickson, Richard Bandler, Robert Dilts ALL have very good books.

Just so you know.... EVERYONE is using these techniques, because it is human behavior, the only difference is, when someone knows exactly what they are doing with it, everyone speaks for the response it illicits.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



The One Party System replaces the Two Party system in the U.S.
  Posted 2 days ago with 14 member flags
Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 16 days ago with 10 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
With all this talk about possible voter fraud...
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags