It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by coffeesniffer
I feel a major event is imminent
In an exclusive report Reuters' Matt Goldstein has uncovered the mystery seller of 75,000 E-Mini contracts during the market melt down. And no, it's not Nassim Taleb as previously reported: the culprit for soaking up ES liquidity (if indeed the selling of 75,000 50x S&P equivalents is enough to throw the market into a 10% tailspin): the "hedging" party is small Kansas-based advisor and asset manager Waddell & Reed (yeah, that was our reaction too). This information is based on an internal CME report which has yet to be disseminated to the general public. Yet the biggest question is not why Waddell trade what it did, when it did, but why did Barclays, which executed the trade for Waddell, stuff the massive order into the pipe, without breaking it up into a thousand child orders first. This is borderline criminal negligence, with Barclays basically begging for their "best executions" practices to be front run by every single algo in existence.
As Matt notes:
Richard X. Bove, the banking analyst at Rochdale Securities, downgraded the Swiss banks UBS and Credit Suisse to “neutral” from “buy” on Friday, citing “a deteriorating situation in Europe’s financial community” for the cut. The move comes as European markets continued to slide amid growing uncertainty over the stability of the euro, which traded at an 18-month low to the dollar on Friday.
General market uncertainty in Europe, caused by the potential for sovereign debt defaults in the so-called PIIGS nations (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain), was the only reason given for Mr. Bove’s downgrade of the two Swiss banks. In fact, Mr. Bove noted that both banks are doing well from an operational standpoint, but that they were basically victims of circumstances, given their location in the heart of Europe.
On UBS, Mr. Bove said he was concerned that potential write-downs of sovereign debt could weigh on the bank’s future earnings. But he also noted that UBS’s exposure to troubled debt securities is unknown, so it is impossible to know how much money the bank has at stake.
“All of this is disconcerting to UBS which is on pace to turn around the company following the troubles of the past two years,” Mr. Bove wrote in a note to clients. “This positive momentum could be derailed by the events surrounding the company.”
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
reply to post by marg6043
The internet has pretty much done away with that. I am surprised the internet hasn't been "silenced" as of yet. Keyword "yet".
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
reply to post by marg6043
Sorry
Try This
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
reply to post by pause4thought
If it does indeed hold under 1.26 for the next few trading sessions it is indeed looking bleak for EUR.