It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted. Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.
2001 April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity."
2002 May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
2003 January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years. February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that "although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations," "the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them." As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market. ("Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO," OFHEO Report, 2/4/03
September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO's review found earnings manipulations.
September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact "legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises" and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.
October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error
November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any "legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk." To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have "broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards" and "receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)
Fannie Mae was created in 1938, under the authority of the National Housing Act of 1934. Until 1968, it was a unit within the federal government. Its function was to expand the availability of residential mortgage finance, by buying mortgages from originators and holding the mortgages; these purchases were funded through debt issuances that were direct obligations of the federal government. As part of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Fannie Mae was spun off from the federal government and became a publicly traded corporation, but it retained an array of special government features (which will be discussed below).
Advantages - They were created by Congress and thus hold special federal charters (unlike virtually all other corporations, which hold charters granted by a state, often Delaware); - The President can appoint five of the eighteen board members of each company;7 - Each company has a potential line of credit with the U.S. Treasury for up to $2.25 billion; - Both companies are exempt from state and local income taxes; - They can use the Federal Reserve as their fiscal agent;8 - Their debt is eligible for use as collateral for public deposits, for purchase by the Federal Reserve in open-market operations, and for unlimited investment by commercial banks and S&Ls; - Their securities are exempt from the Securities and Exchange Commission's registration and reporting requirements and fees;9 - Their securities are explicitly government securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and - Their securities are exempt from the provisions of many state investor protection laws.
Originally posted by Dermo
That sounds like complete bull, that lets on that Bush was actually trying to save those two banks..
Its pretty obvious from this standpoint that he was trying to run he US into the ground and those banks were the catalyst.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Although it happened during Bush's wash Clinton and Carter are more to blame.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Ha, the nervousness that Bush kept warning Congress about this is starting to kick in.
It was Chris Dodd and Barney Frank that kept saying the economy was OK and Bush kept warning.
Although it happened during Bush's wash Clinton and Carter are more to blame.