---

---

woweee..
this MUST be artificial..
like this..

info200.infc.ulst.ac.uk...
www.travelsinireland.com...

[edit on 19-8-2008 by anti72]

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan

---

Yes we know that and i knew this would be the John Lear lovers argument to debunk my debunking. I was showing that odd shape formations like these occur with or without erosion. A simple comet/meteor strike is enough to create these odd geological structures which Mike Lear sorry.... Singh has shown us. We can see the moon has been hit by thousands of these.

[edit on 19-8-2008 by skeppo]

[edit on 19-8-2008 by skeppo]

Another excellent thread Mike. Starred & Flagged!

reply to post by tyranny22

---

Eh? That isn't a picture of a dome it's a picture of a crater. At least, that was the impression I got. I think you may be looking at it wrong.

What about this picture? I'm not sure if it has been posted but it looks weird to me. Not an expert in photography nor anomalies on the moon. But anyway this one looks funky..

lo5-70-h2b

If there really are signs of life on the moon, this is the proof you should be looking for:

reply to post by antmax21

---

If you are talking about the white spots those are the result of some problem during the processing of the photos.

If you are talking about any other thing I don't know what it is, so it may be a good to explain it better.

my God!! These are GREAT photos! I really don't know exactly how to "read" them, but I can tell there is something intoxicating about them. Thanks!!!!

Firstly, John is not here to defend himself and it is incredibly rude for you to lampoon him. If you click the link in my signature you will find a path that leads you to a forum he participates in. Discuss him there.

Here we are discussing the images that Mr. Singh has provided. To debunk these, which contain towers, you provide tower structures (crude and vulgar ones at that, when any tower like objects would have worked). These tower structures, however, were formed from wind/water erosion.

So, once again, i challenge you to make that post relevant by explaining how your images in any way parallel what we see in Mr. Singh's images. Straw man arguements are not welcome, so make sure you approach it differently.

Further, since you have stated taht a comet or meteor strike would create such features, please provide some level of data to back that up. I cannot think of any way for such a violent encounter to create monolithic structures.

Be careful. We do have a geologist that will likely pop up in here today.

reply to post by ArMaP

---

I guess I have nothing more to say because the white dots turn into squiggly lines. But that's all I could see.

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan

---

Here's the best part: we don't have to explain what these structures are. They're simply unknown anomalies.

If you want to state that they are intelligently created, you'll have to prove that

reply to post by thrashee

---

If you bastardize my logic, that might be safe to say.

But, since i use it in an unadulterated form....

...there are geological processes that have happened in the past. THere are "natural" formations due to whatever it was that created all the craters (i am not sold on it being meteorites until i see some video of a current strike, and not just a LTP type of flash).

First, you have to define "natural". Then i would like for you to follow up by telling me what in my post led you to believe that i was of the opinion that it would not exist on the moon.

Were there rovers on the moon before the Lunar Orbiter missions in '66-'67 ? I thought the fist moon rovers landed with the Apollo missions later on? The Lunar Orbiter program was several years before the Apollo missions.

[edit on 19-8-2008 by Acharya]

No sir, i don't. I would have to prove it were i to try to make money from it or something. You know, the whole "fraud" thing that the Freezerfoot boys are going to find out about. Since i am stating my opinions here like others, we are free to state these opinions without proof.

Whether any of these are intelligently created is beyond me. I can say that i know (no i am not saying how i know, it isn't my information to share) that we have operations on the moon currently. Further, i highly suspect that it has been ongoing for decades. John Lear knows this information, I am sure. But he is not my source.

So, really, at the end of it all i am not here to prove anything. l already know. I am here to state my opinion.

I don't have to do anything with your logic in order to state this. It's logically coherent and consistent within itself.



Not anything in particular, that's why I started with "if". We generally have 2 views here: unknown anomalies, or intelligently created structures.

Whoa ha ha, all you debunkers, you know that this time, this time its so obvious: you have lost the battle!
I feel sorry for you guys but you are wrong, Mike is right and NASA hangs!

Nobody can say that all these pics are natural formations, maybe some pics are questionable but others are hard evidence of artificial structure.

You better face it, I have a feeling theres more of it coming soon.

A star and a flag for this historical thread, ATS rocks!!

Does anyone know which image has the "tower"?

It is easier to ask than to see all the images.

Thanks.

hm, maybe at least a real sign..

this is it..





[edit on 19-8-2008 by anti72]

Really? Now all you have to do is prove it. Should be easy, right? Good luck with that.



Wanna bet? These pics are natural formations.

I'll even repeat it for you: these pics are natural formations.



We better face it based upon your "feeling"? Something tells me following your feelings would be like riding a volcano