Uncensored NASA Moon Images!! , page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 226 times


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 01:29 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by estar



Don't forget that these are supposed to be "uncensored" images, so Photoshop is not an option.

And those look like (and probably are) drops of some liquid that were not removed on the process.

Lunar orbiter photos were developed on board by an automatic system that after digitised the images to be sent to Earth.

Anyone that has done (or has seen, like me) the result of a bad work during development of the photos knows what I mean.



reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 01:32 PM by AntisepticSkeptic
So when NASA published pictures of Mars with red skies and acrid, lifeless, panorama, conspiracy theorists scream "Fake!!! Those can't be real!!: Coverup!!! "

When Nasa published pictures of volcano laden lava strewn Venus conspiracy theorists scream "Fake!!! Those can't be real!! Coverup!!! "

And when Nasa published beautiful flawless close up pictures of Saturn conspiracy theorists scream "Fake!!! Those can't be real!!: CGI!!! Coverup!!! "

But...

When Nasa (an agency whom the conspiracy theorists utterly despise) published photos that have only an inconclusive and obscure elements that points to the unlikely, improbable and illogical suggestion to support the conspiracy theorists' mental inclination towards anything extraterestrial in published NASA photos, suddenly the conspiracy theorists clamor in an orgy of senseless excitement?

WTF?

And why does the OP get ALL the compliments? Where did the photos come from?

NASA.

Who took the pictures?

NASA

Who did all the hard work in aquiring the photos?

NASA

Who published the photos so conspiracy theorists can ogle over them for imaginary aliens and alien structures?

NASA

The OP just put a spin on the explanation of NASA's photos. The OP made fantastical and imaginary claims and false deviations from NASA's official explanations, while at the same time stealing the limelight deserved rightfully to NASA alone in a display of exaggerated self-assertion and chest thumping :"Look I discovered all these alien structures that NASA was too lazy to censor. Me da man!"

Oh and one more thing. If there was a coverup OF ANYTHING world-shaking that undermines NASA's existence in these photos they wouldn't have published it at all to the public domain. They wouldn't have airbrushed it so obviously as to put a red flag to attract the attention of every conspiracy theorists on the planet.

They would simply NOT publish it. Why would they take the chance of being found out that they were allegedly lying? Why spend the extra money, time and resources just to raise unwanted suspicion?


So put down Hoaglands Dark Mission book and sing your praises to NASA. The next time you ogle over NASA pictures for pesky aliens and ubiquitous alien structures, think about the men and women of NASA who worked tirelessly day and night so conspiracy theorists can call them liars and falsely accuse them of covering up. Without them these threads simply wouldn't exist.

Have a good day...

[edit on 19-8-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 01:36 PM by TruthTellist
reply to post by AntisepticSkeptic



What is your problem?

Are you just pretending to besmirch the reputation of the rest of the skeptics on this site?

Because you are doing a good job if you are.

[edit on 19-8-2008 by TruthTellist]


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 01:44 PM by ziggystar60
reply to post by ArMaP



I have thought about what you said, that the two adjoining strips have been damaged, and I have gone back to the image to take another look at it. I have come to the conclusion that you may very well be right. It does actually looks like the image/film have been phusichally scratched in that particular area!

But I still think that the angular features I found is on the moon's surface. The features has distinct shadows. And you know that I have the deepest respect for your opinions, but you also know how I feel about NASA...
I am fully aware that I will attract the joint forces of the sceptics at ATS just by saying this, but is it at all possible that someone has done damage to the image to hide something..?

(And just to spare certain members some time and effort:
I am already perfectly aware that I am ignorant, stupid and lack all common sense and reason, and that my postings are the reason that it will take years and years to wash the stigma away from ufology and so forth...)




reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:06 PM by TheOneEyedProphet
reply to post by skeppo



its true , what striking similarities between the earth and moon, that would be anomalous indeed, in planet earth we have an atmosphere, erosion, tectonic plates, weather, and the hand of man, in the moon the conditions are not the same, we cannot give earthly explanations to the phenomena, because the environments are completely different.
Those geological features may have been created by nature, but how??
maybe they have something in common, but not the same origins...


There is a lot to learn still...


The round regular patterns are bad printing techniques for sure, something in the emulsion of the development, in the old days developing pictures was an art...


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:17 PM by chapter29
reply to post by AntisepticSkeptic



The OP gets Kudos for taking the time to find pictures worth taking a second look at.

If you do not see anything out of the ordinary, fine...but to attack the OP for posting these is quite lame. He isn't trying to steal any limelight - that's you..

Tone it down man, that way when you actually have something of value to say people might listen.


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:21 PM by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by skeppo



You really aren't using that as a debunking tool, are you? Those penis shaped rocks were formed by GEOLOGICAL forces, of which the Moon is obviously without, for the most part. No volcano's (recently), no wind, no water, no blowing sand....


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:23 PM by AntisepticSkeptic
reply to post by skeppo



OMG! Those are definitely made by aliens!!!! Oooohhh!! Those must be some sort of conning tower of a buried ancient spaceship that the aliens use to skulk us humans just before they abduct them and use them for alien snacks while watching the Intergalactic Channel in the Hollow Earth!

Seriously this shows that uncommon natural geographical features that looks distantly similar to objects familiar to humans photographed from hundreds of miles away can be presumed as anything that fits the biased mind of the observer.


reply posted on 19-8-2008 @ 02:27 PM by thrashee
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan



Then by your logic, there are NO natural formations on the Moon, are there?
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags