Obama: 1 bomb destroyed Pearl Harbor, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 04:42 PM by iamcamouflage
Originally posted by RRconservative
Originally posted by Animal


Basically the OP is digging for something, anything, he/she can use to make Obama look bad.


Well someone has to. The media refuses to report on any story that would upset the Messianic Lord Obama.

They have no problems pointing out misspeaks by conservatives, but ignore Obama's gaffes. The typical media response for Obama would be something like this..."AHHH how cute, he is working soooo hard, and is sooo tired from his campaign, that he innocently misspoke, no big deal....nothing to see here."


Agreed, everyone should research candidates on there own and expose things that are not being covered. With that said, is this really news worthy? Should people base who they vote for on a "gaffe" if thats what you want to call it. Mispronouncing a word or leaving out the plural form, everyone does these things. Now making a absolutely false statement is something totally different. If Obama had said that Spain had bombed pearl harbor, i could see you posting this but seriously. If you are trying to expose Obama, you need to keep digging because this type of crap is really childish.

Now if you want to start a battle about gaffes, and the presidential candidates, then so be it but you will find that McCain has made many, many more. But thats besides the point. If McCain mispronounces something or leaves out a plural form, I DONT CARE, everyone makes these verbal mistakes. Show me someone lying, or that they are intolerant or that they dont have respect for the rule of law. Then you might get someones attention.

If this garbage is the best you can do to scare people from voting for Obama, he just might win.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 04:47 PM by iamcamouflage
reply to post by RRconservative



Messianic Lord Obama


Nice talking point by the way, did you make that one up yourself? Oh wait, every right wing radio guy has been spouting that same phrase this week. Why dont you try to at least come up with your own catch phrase. Make sure it is really out there, maybe start intentionally refering to him as Barack Hussein Obama, wait thats been done, or maybe call him a secret muslim....no wait that one has been done as well....oh i know you could create a avatar with obama with his nose in the air and refer to him as an elitist. Oh thats been done as well. Maybe you could make him appear to have really big ears, that will scare people away from voting for him.

[edit on 8-8-2008 by iamcamouflage]


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 06:44 PM by LateApexer313
reply to post by RRconservative



Hiyah RR,

It's amazing isn't it? Here's my own personal theory to explain this phenomenon when listing any of their (politicians) ridiculous "gaffs." And it's pretty common-sense as everyone, even us "common folk" can agree with:

No matter where you attend college, or how smart you are, or how many people are coaching you on what to say in public...the more you deviate from the truth, the more mistakes you will make. Factual mistakes, the strain of trying to remember who you told what story to, etc. It all catches up to you in the end.

You can apply this theory to any politician of any party or any person for that matter.

You can tell as they stutter and stammer answering questions that make them uncomfortable, you can tell this when Hillary blundered with the "under fire" in Bosnia story, when McCain was asked about abortion, ad nauseum.

It's laughable, no matter who does it, but Obama is having an exceedingly hard time keeping up with his lies

My two cents...


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 07:36 PM by iamcamouflage
reply to post by RRconservative



I should point out your gaffe and say that Obama has not avoided any debates, only town hall meetings with McCain. But he will debate McCain in september so I guess we will see who is better at dealing with questions on the fly.


reply posted on 8-8-2008 @ 07:38 PM by iamcamouflage
reply to post by jetxnet



Yeah, good one lets imply that he is a closet muslim. Very orignal. Care to back up that claim with any proof or would you just prefer to perpetuate a lie.



reply posted on 9-8-2008 @ 10:36 AM by Sublime620
reply to post by RRconservative





So you can ignore Bush not knowing what tribal sovereignty is but trying to pretend like he did, not knowing the "fool me once" phrase, using improper grammar when talking about the importance of educating children, and misstating history to the point that facts are completely incorrect?

But of course Obama leaves off an "s" and he's an idiot? There's a big difference between a small misread and having no knowledge of a subject at all.

Hey, but let's call a spade a spade: once Obama gets an entire slew of websites about "Obama-isms"... we'll talk. Until then, have fun reading the thousands of verbal misstates that the guy you currently support made:

Google Search "Bushism"

And here is a clarification just to avoid another post about how meaningful it was that Obama accidentally left off an "s":

Here's the difference between a verbal mistake and a lack of knowledge:

Verbal Mistakes by Bush

Bushims

"And they have no disregard for human life."


Does Bush really want them to have disregard for human life?

"We have enough coal to last for 250 years, yet coal also prevents an environmental challenge." —Washington, D.C., April 20, 2005


Does Bush really think that coal prevents environmental problems?

No, of course not. It's just funny that he is such a terrible speaker that he makes a verbal faux pas about everytime he open his mouth (and yet he's somehow the President of the United States).




Now here is unmistakable idiocy:



Here is the text in case you refuse to watch the video:

"Tribal sovereignty means that; it's sovereign. I mean, you're a — you've been given sovereignty, and you're viewed as a sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal government and tribes is one between sovereign entities." —President Bush, Washington, D.C., Aug. 6, 2004


Listen to the crowd actually laugh at The President of the United States' response because it was so uneducated and dumb.

But of course, even our own generals have said that Bush is a "poor student of history".




So quit blaming the media. The media does not own the Internet. There are plenty of privately owned sites dedicated to how poorly Bush speaks. If Obama was half of the verbal oaf that Bush was, he'd have entire websites dedicated to his verbal slip ups with a nickname for them also.

Seriously though RR, like that old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, "fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."

...

[edit on 9-8-2008 by Sublime620]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^