It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by q_ball
another reptillian thread!! Again show me solid proof..!! How could humans shift into reptiles?
Impossible.
Originally posted by awakened sleeper
Just to make things clear, they are lizards. Shape-shifting lizards, lizards that can change to and fro whenever they please-
If you believe that I am crazy then go out and prove it. Yes, that is right; prove to me that there are not lizzies running about here and in the 4th dimension. Prove all of this is just a bunch of tree bark. Ah, but you cannot. Question me, and question this information, but get off your behinds and prove it wrong. Do some bloody research, look around a bit, and ask questions.
Originally posted by awakened sleeper
If you believe that I am crazy then go out and prove it. Yes, that is right; prove to me that there are not lizzies running about here and in the 4th dimension. Prove all of this is just a bunch of tree bark. Ah, but you cannot. Question me, and question this information, but get off your behinds and prove it wrong. Do some bloody research, look around a bit, and ask questions.
Originally posted by Cythraul
I believe the OP even used the term "super-stock". I'm not suggesting anyone here is promoting notions of racial superiority,
For the sake of clarity, we will repeat that Finno-Ugrian, along with Samoyedic, forms the Uralic linguistic stock or sub-stock which may or may not be united with Turkic, Tungusic, and Mongolian in a Ural-Altaic superstock. It is now believed that early Finno-Ugriain was one of the two elements which blended to form basic Indo-European. Source
Well, I understand that for some proof is impossible to come by while sitting behind a computer in your home. Especially of something that happened 10-12000 years ago.
What they had in common was a tall stature, light skin, light hair, and pale eyes. They were the first to domesticate the horse, around 4000BC.
Now, I realize the Black Sea deluge theory does not line up in terms of dates. However, they are not far off. If the deluge happened around 5600 BC, that is 7600 years ago. If we allow for a slow rise to normal levels, and a margin of error for the dates, they could come pretty close.
Now imagine the scales of the armour coloured a pale green. It is no wonder they were thought of as reptilians. And the horse possibly as some kind of chimera.
You see, the statues were made thousands of years after the fact when the serpent/reptilian myth was already ingrained in the culture. They are not literal representations, but representations based on a description passed down through oral tradition. The notion that an oral history would not be corrupted over a period of one or two thousand years is ludicrous.
Sheesh. No, they are not lizards. I am trying to do a half decent thread here with historical fact and some logical reasoning. Why do you feel the need to pollute it with this garbage? Begin your own thread if you can't handle it.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
With regards to the racial features of these people again there is no proof of their hair and eye color! Sorry does not wash. It is a well known fact that mummies be it natural or man made mummies of all races after a long period of time the hair seems to turn a reddish blondish color, regardless of race.
Comparing the colour of similarly aged South American mummies, there is no reason for anything other than a very slight lightening of the hair color in the very oldest mummies.
Originally posted by Cythraul
Interesting thread. Although I agree with Leira - it seems a connection is being made between 'aryan' features and the propensity for advancement in civilisation, as though non-'aryans' would not be capable of such achievements.