TheComte
This has been a very interesting post. I have read through the entire post and have enjoyed it thoroughly up to and including the usual “thread
Hoppers” that don’t bother reading the post just jump to conclusions by reading the titles.
Again I ask for more proof and less speculation.
Well, I understand that for some proof is impossible to come by while sitting behind a computer in your home. Especially of something that happened
10-12000 years ago.
Well actually some of us work and live in the real world, and open real books and talk with real professors at universities.
What they had in common was a tall stature, light skin, light hair, and pale eyes. They were the first to domesticate the horse, around
4000BC.
With regards to the racial features of these people again there is no proof of their hair and eye color! Sorry does not wash. It is a well known fact
that mummies be it natural or man made mummies of all races after a long period of time the hair seems to turn a reddish blondish color, regardless of
race.
So the proof is in the mummies! Does not wash. You bring up a good amount of history and have done a wonderful job of connecting the dots but this is
not the first time I have heard this THEORY.
You have also thrown in Leprechauns and the priory of Sion? Again I ask for facts man FACTS. You did a wonderful job with your DNA evidence, Applauds
loudly. I can see how they may have migrated hell even the people of Bass descent were lately found to be of a east African blood line. Good job
there.
but...
Now, I realize the Black Sea deluge theory does not line up in terms of dates.
However, they are not far off. If the deluge happened around 5600 BC, that is 7600 years ago. If we allow for a slow rise to normal levels, and a
margin of error for the dates, they could come pretty close.
Again I'm glad you realize it's a THEORY, and even in your own logic it does not line up.
Dont get me wrong I thouroughly enjoyed this thread it's a great read. But I think it's more fiction as you state here
Now imagine the scales of the armour coloured a pale green. It is no wonder they were thought of as reptilians. And the horse possibly as some kind
of chimera.
Imagine? No FACTS?
You see, the statues were made thousands of years after the fact when the serpent/reptilian myth was already ingrained in the culture. They are not
literal representations, but representations based on a description passed down through oral tradition. The notion that an oral history would not be
corrupted over a period of one or two thousand years is ludicrous.
Again no facts SPECULATION on the OP's part here!
Some one has posted a contrary opinion, No need to state that what they see is ludicrous when their opinion runs contrary to yours.
Sheesh. No, they are not lizards. I am trying to do a half decent thread here with historical fact and some logical reasoning. Why do you feel the
need to pollute it with this garbage? Begin your own thread if you can't handle it.
I feel your pain here OP People should read the freaking thread completely before mindlessly making statements like that.
Again this has been a great read it has been a most entertaining mix of real history with a little bit of drama and a nice amount of FICTION thrown in
for good measure.
But too many " IF's " and " Possibly " and " One Could Imagine " and
" Maybes “
For my taste if one is trying to propose a theory like this
I’m looking forward to the rest of your post on this thread TheComte
SLAY
[edit on 23-7-2008 by SLAYER69]
