Originally posted by Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men
It seems, yes, you do need to spend an inordinate amount of time compiling what it is you are haphazardly referring to.
Start with one exact example. ...We can go from there.
You do see the 'Search' button on the top of the screen, do you not? I will, to appease you, give you some examples:
Anything authored by stompk/cutbothways. Insults, inuendo and unsubstantiation are the rule of thumb.
Please read the 'Interesting place to find a Masonic obelisk' thread. 20 pages of not providing any proof but quite an amount of unsupported
opinion.
Anything by Freight Tomsen. An unabashed self-promoter whose inability to debate but desire for notoriety got him banned.
Several posts by ChadAndrewsATS. This hate spewing individual likened Masons to all forms of nefarious schemes, plots and acts all without providing
any proof, unless you call linking Youtube videos proof.
All of these posters were present on Above Top Secret in the past month, a further examination of these forums past posts and threads will unearth
more of the same. Do these examples satisfy your parameters as to no longer refer to the aforementioned topics as 'haphazardly' compiled?
You may also address a topic that you yourself seem to favor, that Above Top Secret is somehow controlled/run by Masons.
[edit on 20-5-2008 by AugustusMasonicus]
[edit on 20-5-2008 by AugustusMasonicus]