It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am expecting a quake in this region of at least a magnitude 5.0 but more likely in the 6.0 range, with a time window within the next three days. The most likely region is actually in the Nth Kuril Islands, in the circle I've added to the map below, at approx 153E, 47N, but I have to state that historically, the fault region NE of here within the Kamchatka region itself is known to be unstable and could be affected.
Please also keep an eye on the Kamchatka region. I will probably post specific details tomorrow. (ie in about 12 hours from now.)
Detection of Hydrothermal Precursors to Large Northern California Earthquakes
Paul G. Silver 1 and Nathalie J. Valette-Silver 2
1 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015
2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20741
During the period 1973 to 1991 the interval between eruptions from a periodic geyser in Northern California exhibited precursory variations 1 to 3 days before the three largest earthquakes within a 250-kilometer radius of the geyser. These include the magnitude 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake of 18 October 1989 for which a similar preseismic signal was recorded by a strainmeter located halfway between the geyser and the earthquake. These data show that at least some earthquakes possess observable precursors, one of the prerequisites for successful earthquake prediction. All three earthquakes were further than 130 kilometers from the geyser, suggesting that precursors might be more easily found around rather than within the ultimate rupture zone of large California earthquakes.
Water for the Old Faithful Geyser of California comes from an underground river. When this water flows over the hot molten magma deep in the earth, it boils and expands and is collected in large cavities. Under tremendous pressure from the heat, and assisted by a constriction of the passage upward, the superheated water is forced through the fissures and fractures and erupts with an outpouring of steam followed by a fulmination of hot dancing water.
Under normal conditions, the water, the heat and the underground structure all remain constant and for this reason Old Faithful erupts regularly. Conditions which cause deviations from the normal pattern seem to relate to earthquakes. The Old Faithful Geyser of California is proving itself a predictor of quakes.
From two days to two weeks prior to an earthquake, the Old Faithful Geyser of California gives warning by delaying its regular performance from the average thirty minutes to a longer interval. During this prolonged interval, it may send up "splits," small eruptions to no more than two or three feet in height, every few minutes. Finally, after the long delay, a 60-foot column of water and steam shoots upward.
Getting back to this prediction method: generally, there are two caveats to all this. First, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge quake has to be fairly significant (getting up around a mag 6 or higher) for there to be a follow-on quake at around 180 deg long away (and a similar latitude), and second, the region that is half-way round the world usually needs to be one that historically has a fair degree of seismicity. (ie It lies on or near a major fault.)
Originally posted by JustMike
Thanks for the positive feedback
Some readers might be interested to know a bit more about the process I used to make the Kuril Islands/Kamchatka region prediction on Dec 19, so I’ll give a summary here.
Now people can either take it or leave it, but my methods generally involve a combination of the rather boring/scientific and the more esoteric and that was the case this time. Back on Dec 18, my attention was drawn to the Kuril Islands/Kamchatka region, which is why in this post that I made on Dec 18 at 10.08 pm (UTC) I said:
Please also keep an eye on the Kamchatka region. I will probably post specific details tomorrow. (ie in about 12 hours from now.)
What I meant by this was that I was expecting something that would indicate an upcoming quake in the Kurils/Kamchatka region. The following morning (Dec 19) I checked the USGS maps as usual and saw that there had just been a mag 5.9 quake on the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which occurred at 8:31 am (UTC). The data page for this quake is shown below:
(Original image from USGS. Image reproduced for informational and educational purposes only.)
This was the “something” that I had been expecting and which led me to make the initial “advisory” post on Dec 18 -- about 9 ½ hours before this quake occurred. So, that is the “esoteric” side, but in this case the esoteric component wasn’t really all that important, it’s more a matter of curiosity that I even posted it I suppose.
Now I wouldn’t forgive anyone if you’re scratching your head and wondering how on Earth a quake on the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge could be any kind of indicator for a quake in the Kamchatka/Kuril Islands region, but the answer is very simple. I had previously noticed that it was not uncommon for Mid-Atlantic ridge quakes to be followed by others in very specific regions of the world, namely in places almost exactly 180 degrees’ longitude away and in roughly the same latitude. (Latitude seems to vary more than longitude in these cases, as far as I’ve observed.)
The process of one quake causing another at a great distance is acknowledged by scientists and is called “dynamic triggering”. This article gives a few details. However, I don’t see much evidence of scientists making predictions based upon this phenomenon. I guess it could be because reputations could be at stake, but as I have no reputation anyway then I don’t mind making predictions. Also, in that article they only say that “large quakes can trigger smaller tremors”. While that may generally be true, I am thinking that the major ridges (especially the Mid-Atlantic) might be capable of much more than just setting off some “tremors”. At least, that’s what I’ve observed -- but granted, a lot more research is needed.
Getting back to this prediction method: generally, there are two caveats to all this. First, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge quake has to be fairly significant (getting up around a mag 6 or higher) for there to be a follow-on quake at around 180 deg long away (and a similar latitude), and second, the region that is half-way round the world usually needs to be one that historically has a fair degree of seismicity. (ie It lies on or near a major fault.)
So, because this Mid-Atlantic Ridge quake on Dec 19 was a 5.9 (hence around the right amount of energy), and as 180 degrees’ longitude away (at around 47 N latitude) places us in the Kuril Islands (bordering Kamchatka), I felt able to make the prediction as I did.
As it happens, the quake in the Kurils today was located 179.873 deg longitude away from the Northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge quake of Dec 19 (or 180.127 deg if you go the other direction), and the difference in latitude was only 0.421 degrees. Here is a map to illustrate:
(Original image from USGS. Additional data placed on the image by the author of this post. Image reproduced for informational and educational purposes only.)
It’s important to note that this method of prediction is not guraranteed to produce results every time. However, it does serve to illustrate what’s possible and perhaps with more detailed research it could be turned into a fairly reliable method. I am coming to the belief that places like the Mid-Atlantic ridge have effects far beyond what is are generally acknowledged and further, I believe that they should be studied much more closely.
Just to finish I guess I should make it clear that the method given here was not what I used for my successful predictions for Japan, off-coast Oregon, Alaska, the Philippines region, off the coast of Taiwan (and I think some others that I’ve forgotten! ) which are logged in this thread. While I looked at certain indicators for all those predictions, the activities of the various ridges were not part of the process.
But this post is long enough already so I’ll save that for another day.
Mike
Edited to correct detail on map.
[edit on 22/12/08 by JustMike]