What happened to the sanctity of marriage?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:08 AM by Karlhungis
reply to post by ANOK





You might be right that monogamy is better for you, and there is no reason you shouldn't practice it. It's when you want to force your values and desires on others I have a problem


I agree with the statement, but from the other side of the issue. I have no problem with people not wanting to get married. I have no problem with people disagreeing with monogamy. My problem is when they don't agree with the sanctitiy of marriage, yet they get married anyways. If you don't agree with it, don't get married. Don't destroy another person simply because you don't believe that marriage is the right thing to do.


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:23 AM by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by Karlhungis



I guess all I can say to that Karl, is that I would hope it could be thoroughly communicated and understood prior to marriage, so that there would be no doubt both people agreed on what 'sanctity of marriage' meant to them. I really don't think that level of communication is revealed and discussed amongst first-time newly weds... I think many couples just assume the other understands what their idea of a union is... The remedy is to not rush into marriage, so there is ample time in learning and understanding whether or not the couple would truly work on a life-long monogamous relationship. My honest opinion is that unions like that are very rare, hence divorce rates.


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 02:30 AM by Karlhungis
reply to post by Lucid Lunacy





My honest opinion is that unions like that are very rare


I think you are correct. I would venture a guess that only a very small fraction of couples are that honest before getting married. If I had to guess, I would still say that the majority of couples getting married do honestly think that they are in love and it will feel like that forever. They aren't really taking a real look at what a long term relationship will be like. I doubt many can honestly remove themselves from the situation and take an objective look at it. Then they end up disappointed when it isn't always "sunshine and rainbows" that they think they deserve.


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 04:07 AM by Cythraul
Originally posted by ANOK
Marriage is an institution created by the Church as an early form of control.

Monogamy is a cultural creation stemming from Christianity and the Romans, it's not our natural state.

Where did you get this from? Monogamy wasn't invented by Christianity and the Romans, it is linked with the development of the human capacity for civilisation. Pre-Christian Germanic tribes were monogamous, Queen Boudicca the Celtic Pagan Queen was monogamous. And what about all the non-Christian tribes in South America who still live by ancient traditions - they pair off into family units.

In short, monogamy may have been our natural state 50,000 years ago, but the human mind/spirit has developed enormously since then and we have been monogamous for a very long time. The reason? Well it's a concept vital to forming ordered, productive communities. Those same communities would be chaotic if everyone went around freely screwing everyone. Perhaps that's where we're heading now.

My opinion as to why the sanctity of marriage is falling apart now:
We work longer hours, we travel further for work, and we relocate more than ever. This has resulted in the breakdown of both family and community ties. Leisure time and a good family/community support structure is vital to releasing stress, tension and frustration. Those methods of release are gone now and marriage seems to be more of a formality than through genuine love and support. Also, we are less and less familiar with our neighbours. In the close-knit communities of the past, it wasn't easy to get away with infidelity because everyone knew everyone else's business (sometimes this isn't such a bad thing).


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 06:38 AM by DuneKnight
Originally posted by Cythraul
My opinion as to why the sanctity of marriage is falling apart now:
We work longer hours, we travel further for work, and we relocate more than ever. This has resulted in the breakdown of both family and community ties. Leisure time and a good family/community support structure is vital to releasing stress, tension and frustration. Those methods of release are gone now and marriage seems to be more of a formality than through genuine love and support. Also, we are less and less familiar with our neighbours. In the close-knit communities of the past, it wasn't easy to get away with infidelity because everyone knew everyone else's business (sometimes this isn't such a bad thing).


definitely society changed becoming more vulnerable to family structure collapse but whats more interesting is the fact that society doesn't need the family structure anymore thus rendering the whole family/marriage thing useless even a novelty of sorts. thats why same sex couples could now raise kids of their own, sperm banks, single mothers, etc.

and i think people should have a look at this, because it proves that infidelity is only natural:
The sexy son hypothesis has been suggested as the origin of some aspects of human sexual behavior. In particular, it has been shown that human females are more attracted to traditionally masculine men ("cads") during the most fertile times of their menstrual cycles, and more attracted to relatively feminine men ("dads") during the remainder of the cycle.[2] These observations have led to the conclusion that infidelity is a natural occurrence in women, and evolutionarily advantageous, on the grounds that it will enable them to secure both the best genes and the best caregiver for their offspring. Sexy sons hypothesis

thats just one biological aspect of it, I'm not sure as of yet why males would sacrifice their marriage. unhappiness doesn't justify divorce because that state of being is normal, its when you are 'happy' thats not normal.

[edit on 12-5-2008 by DuneKnight]


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 07:28 AM by tevis69
reply to post by darkelf



Even though i'm not married(yet) lol, I don't think I could ever do that. The guilt I would have looming over my head would kill me and I would end up fessing up eventually.
Despite the fact that there have been many many chances for me to be with other women while dating one, I never ever acted on it. It's childish, selfish and just plain wrong.

I guess I was just brought up in a way that made me want to be more faithful to my significant other then the majority of those statistics


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 07:57 AM by Cythraul
Originally posted by DuneKnight
and i think people should have a look at this, because it proves that infidelity is only natural:
The sexy son hypothesis has been suggested as the origin of some aspects of human sexual behavior. In particular, it has been shown that human females are more attracted to traditionally masculine men ("cads") during the most fertile times of their menstrual cycles, and more attracted to relatively feminine men ("dads") during the remainder of the cycle.[2] These observations have led to the conclusion that infidelity is a natural occurrence in women, and evolutionarily advantageous, on the grounds that it will enable them to secure both the best genes and the best caregiver for their offspring. Sexy sons hypothesis


It proves that infidelity was only natural in times when primal instinct dominated civility. A big change took place a number of millenia ago - the development of culture, tradition and order.

This is a complicated argument for me because I'm a fairly big proponent of Primitivism. Then again, there's "primitivism", and then there's "primitivism". By that I mean that we were once primal creatures but we then developed art, culture and religion. I support a kind of primitivism based upon the post-culture human (numbering about 40,000 years in age). Since then we've discovered the benefits of monogamy.



reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 09:36 AM by DuneKnight
reply to post by Cythraul



i read an anthropological study once that labeled women as relating to nature while men as proponents of change and order. which is why many religions implemented in early history that restricted society from being primitive and any one who did not follow was socially ostracized. mind you that includes sacrifices and weird rituals as means of purification so it wasn't all good. this is tribal stuff, but now everything is global and it harbors many communities even in one country like US where there are polygamist cults. as now in society that rarely believes in something and if they are religious they believe that Jesus will forgive them no matter what, as long as you confess about it. there is no 'social outcasting' for things like divorce or not believing in marriage. and certainly there is no concepts of purification because its all nihilism baby.

[edit on 12-5-2008 by DuneKnight]


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 11:09 AM by DuneKnight
reply to post by whaaa



it is true that this seems to be an American thing, other countries have no problems with marriage. everyone remains faithful but i attribute that to arranged marriages and no pre-marital sex, actually people who are married as virgins are more likely to have a stable marriage.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags