It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by DimensionalDetective
The intelligence said "there's WMD's, lookit them"
They went in
There were no WMD's
The intelligence was faulty.
if you want to blame bush for anything, blame him for not acting sooner(someone else here said that, but i agree with them)
Had bush not given Sadam so much time, then there would be no shadow of a doubt today about his WMD's
So your assumption says that Sadamn had zero WMD's?
If my assumption about your opinion is correct, then i guess it'd also be safe to assume taht you think, after he gassed his "card buddies" (refered to earlier in this thread)
he simply....ran out of weapons?
The people oppressed by Sadam had a trial for him
he was convicted
he was sentenced to death
i guess that was bush's fault too?
I guess the people who testified about horrible treatment and inhumane dictatorship were liars, and politically obligated to do so, to support bush?
I suppose you think that movies like "redacted" are considered non-fiction, and hold them up like the bible.
If you do- hey man, thats fine. All the power to ya.
But you're not allowed to consider yourself an objective person.
you cannot prove that iraq didnt have WMDs
just like i cannot prove iraq DID have WMDs
but to say that bush should be tried fro murder, simply because your political ideology disagree's with his, is simply insane
but of course
thats just my opinion