The Prosecution Of George W. Bush For Murder, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 48 times


reply posted on 12-5-2008 @ 12:57 PM by TeslaandLyne
Originally posted by MacDonagh
Originally posted by jasonhb
reply to
post by DimensionalDetective



Yes, this is certainly a bogus thread. No leg to stand on.


Indeed. Absolutely no evidence that Bush benefited from lying to the public he's supposed to serve. None at all. He's actually the greatest leader of the 21st century because you can't misunderestimate his ability to unmislead the masses. His uppance will come.

Now I must go and rearrange my collection of tinned foil hats that I acquired from a travelling merchant from Tuscany and a bumbling lovable orphan from Finland called Juho.

Paraguay is supposed to be quite nice in the spring.


Perhaps he is being held hostage by the Illuminati or the ET (for the tin foil
crowd) and has to go with the flow.

The 911 investigation involvement and Nazi backing history have been
BIG TIME on the web for years.

If all that bounces off the Illuminati like bullets off superman there
is no hope of even the slightest threat to Bush being accused of
anything.



reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 12:12 AM by Sneerglaw_II
Seeing as I'm posting here i know im fighting an uphill battle.......but here it goes.


IF Bush lied about Iraq, why didnt Congress figure it out? They read the same documents he did and voted to go to war! One being a female running for president, go figure! But she never read the reports, only a handful of senators actually did. Doesnt say much about them(both Left and Right). So dont put the blame in the hands of our President, put the blame in the hands of the government as a whole, since they missed it also(Now that is IF he lied, but seeing as how 22 other countries came up with the same intel we did, I highly doubt it was a lie).

And why did it take more than a dozen UN resolutions before anyone did anything about Iraq? If anything we(US) were keeping our part of the bargain with Iraq. Resolutions which infact were given when Clinton was in office. Resolutions about WMD's, but Saddam wouldnt abide by them.

I say we were enforcing what no one else in the UN would(Food for Oil scandel anyone???)

IF he lied about it, why? It certainly wasnt for oil. And if it was wouldnt he go for a more oil rich country(sorry to say that Iraq doesnt hold the 2nd most oil reserves)? Why are the gas prices going up in the United States? Bush isnt getting it. Every penny can be accounted for for the prices of gas. Cheney(sp?) maybe, but bush no.

AND Saddam DID have WMD's!!! Yeah I said it fellas, sorry to bust your bubble. He's used them on the Kurds! Why dont you seem to remember that?

Also, the war in Iraq ended years ago. We are no longer fighting Iraq! I hope you all realize that. But it seems that most of you dont. We're fighting Terrorists, yes terrorist. Now if they happen to be Iraq citizens, that doesnt mean we're fighting Iraq still.

So anyone wanting to pull out of Iraq now is supporting terrorism. Now before you flame me all to hell......I really want you to think about it for a day or so. Really think about it. Anyone willing to blowthemselves up to kill American troops/civilians is a T.E.R.R.O.R.I.S.T. regardless of where they're doing it.

You people seem to blame everything that happens in this country on Bush, because thats soemone you can point the finger at and say, "well hes our leader, he controls everything so it must be his fault!". Well it doesnt work that way, i wish it was that simple guys, but it cant be.

You wonder why your gas prices is going up? You wonder why food prices is going up? You wonder why the economy is in a slump? There is only one place to look for the answers to those questions, "Global Warming".

But thats another topic for another time. Stop trying to blame Bush for everything you dont like about your country and yourself, and start loving your country for those very reasons, because this is one of the few countries where you can talk the way you are talking here. Freedom is one thing you take for granted when you never have to fight for it.


reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 08:50 AM by grover
reply to post by Sneerglaw_II



No they did not... they were given briefings by administration spokesmen and saw only the "intel" that they wanted them to see.

So no they did not read the same documents the White House did.

BTW that is throughly documented in and of itself.



reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 10:58 AM by thefreepatriot
reply to post by traderonwallst



Sad, you still think this is about democrats and republicans?


reply posted on 13-5-2008 @ 04:32 PM by SHADOW WALKER
reply to post by tankthinker Don"t Ever Underestimate The "True" Patriots Of This Great Country. .Bush, Chaney , Rove ,Rumsfeld, Kissinger , And The Whole Bush Criminal Family WILL Be Served Their Punishment For The CRIMES That They Have Committed Believe Me ! These Traitors Will Not Go Unpunished .The Stage's Are Being Set In Motion For It To Happen . They Can Run But They Cant Hide . It Just Takes Organization And The Commitment To RIGHT THE WRONGS .And The Brass Cajones To GET IT DONE !!




reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 10:19 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin


WMD, al-Qaida links debunked

The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them or had links to al-Qaida or both.


Sources:

www.msnbc.msn.com...

www.cnn.com...

www.washingtonpost.com...


LMAO

nuff said.

Nice try though.




[edit on 13-6-2008 by DimensionalDetective]


reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 10:36 PM by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by DimensionalDetective



and once again
go re-read my post

Prove to me that Saddam Didnt have WMD's
you can't

you can only prove that i can't prove he did

So, if he said no to UN weapons inspectors for weeks

what do you think he was doing?

Playing canasta with the kurds?

[edit on 13-6-2008 by Andrew E. Wiggin]


reply posted on 13-6-2008 @ 10:41 PM by DimensionalDetective
reply to post by Andrew E. Wiggin



LOL

Never a SINGLE SHRED of evidence he did-Even the "complicit" congress admits it. But if you want to stay in your bubble world of the "what-ifs" to keep justifiying this train-wreck and illegal occupation, knock yourself out homie. Ignorance is bliss...

peace
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 190 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 83 replies