It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bottom line, Iran is a bigger threat to the Middle East than any other ME nation at this time. It is because Iran's President is a Muslim radical hellbent on Israels destruction and Islamic rule through the ME.
The proof is out there, go find it.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
If Israel doesnt have to submit, neither should they.
There needs to be a counter balance...
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Isn't it funny how a nation like Iran, who has never invaded another nation in it's modern history is not even allowed the possibility of pursuing Nuclear weapons
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
but on the other hand Israel, who has been offensively bombing Gaza and Lebanon back into the Stone Ages for decades and have no restraint in attacking civilians; has acquired them without any discussion and without anyone knowing.
On June 19, 1967, the National Unity Government [of Israel] voted unanimously to return the Sinai to Egypt and the Golan Heights to Syria in return for peace agreements. The Golans would have to be demilitarized and special arrangement would be negotiated for the Straits of Tiran. The government also resolved to open negotiations with King Hussein of Jordan regarding the Eastern border.
The Israeli decision was to be conveyed to the Arab nations by the United States. The US was informed of the decision, but did not re transmit it. There is no evidence of receipt from Egypt or Syria, and some historians claim that they may have never received the offer
Originally posted by Harlequin
The Israeli decision was to be conveyed to the Arab nations by the United States. The US was informed of the decision, but did not re transmit it. There is no evidence of receipt from Egypt or Syria, and some historians claim that they may have never received the offer
give peace a chance.
Originally posted by _Del_
That statement could also imply the US sent along the message and Egypt and Syria didn't even reply with a "No thanks".
And Dimona would be used for making bombmaking material not nuclear powerplant fuel. It needs that fuel to operate. It's not a commercial power facility.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Yes, and we all know the US, acting as an intermediary between nations looking across a "No-Man's-Land" at each other, would NEVER do anything to screw up a peace deal that might reduce a client country's need to buy US-built military hardware. Naaah, we're above reproach, aren't we?
At this point in the mid-1950s, Israel's nuclear weapons program began receiving aid from other countries. By the Suez crisis in 1956, according to the preleminary Protocol of Sèvres, France agreed to help Israel build a nuclear reactor and reprocessing plant near Dimona which used natural uranium moderated by heavy water. Plutonium production started in about 1964. Top secret British documents obtained by BBC Newsnight show that Britain made hundreds of secret shipments of restricted materials to Israel in the 1950s and 1960s. These included specialist chemicals for reprocessing and samples of fissile material—uranium-235 in 1959, and plutonium in 1966, as well as highly enriched lithium-6 which is used to boost fission bombs and fuel hydrogen bombs. The investigation also showed that Britain shipped 20 tons of heavy water directly to Israel in 1959 and 1960 to start up the Dimona reactor. The transaction was made through a Norwegian front company called Noratom which took a 2% commission on the transaction. Britain was challenged about the heavy water deal at the International Atomic Energy Agency after it was exposed on Newsnight in 2005. British Foreign Minister Kim Howells hid behind the Noratom contract and claimed this was a sale to Norway. But a former British intelligence officer who investigated the deal at the time confirmed that this was really a sale to Israel and the Noratom contract was just a charade.[10] The Foreign Office finally admitted in March 2006 that Britain knew the destination was Israel all along.[11]
In 1961, the Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion informed the Canadian Prime Minister John Diefenbaker that a pilot plutonium-separation plant would be built at Dimona. British intelligence concluded from this and other information that this "can only mean that Israel intends to produce nuclear weapons".[12] By 1969, U.S. Defense Secretary Melvin Laird believed that Israel might have a nuclear weapon that year.[13][14] Later that year, U.S. President Richard Nixon in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir pressed Israel to "make no visible introduction of nuclear weapons or undertake a nuclear test program", so maintaining a policy of nuclear ambiguity.[15] The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency believed that Israel's first bombs may have been made with highly enriched uranium stolen in the mid-1960s from the U.S. Navy nuclear fuel plant operated by the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation in Apollo, Pennsylvania, where sloppy material accounting would have masked the theft.[16][17]
Source - Wiki
Originally posted by _Del_
I said it could ALSO be interpreted that way. I didn't say that was the only way to interpret it. I didn't attempt to use scathing sarcasm to imply he was an idiot for not interpreting it that way, either.
As for Iran, I said it was savvy move. And that they had a choice to develop the weapons and withdraw from the treaty, or to stay a signatory and receive the benefits. Just like Israel chose to forgo being a signatory in exchange for developing nuclear weapons. Notice they don't have a commercial reactor: that is because noone will import the fuel necessary for it.
I don't know how that makes me guilty of the list of sins you've provided. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that I'm condemning Iran for some reason.
Originally posted by _Del_
reply to post by Harlequin
I give up. I only tried to say it was an ambiguous comment. Obviously that means I'm king of the zionists who can do no wrong and I hate Iran. My apologies. I meant to say Israel has no right to exist and that Iran should be able to have it's cake and eat it too in regards to the treaty even though Israel doesn't.
*slaps forehead*