It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Attention ATS! Know The Hidden Meanings Behind the Laws in America, Before it is Too Late!

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+37 more 
posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:19 AM
It is my intention in this thread to kick down some doors and loose some revelations on the members here, who might have been unaware of certain laws on the books and what they really mean. These Laws and Codes are hiding in plain sight. But if people are unaware of their existence and their true meaning; then we continue to be as sheep led to slaughter. What I intend to reveal here profoundly affects every man, woman and child in America. Some of these same laws also apply in Canada and England. You might want to do research for your area as well. Many of America and Canada's laws were carried over from British origins.

Justice Order and Law

The Supreme Court of the United States, for example, the branch of government designed as the logical protector of individual rights, has in fact been one of the more corrupting influences. Not just in terms of its recent, politically inspired travesties of justice, but early in its history when it began as series of ruling in favor of the Corporate Rule of our lives, including the horrendous 1886 ruling that held that a private corporation was a natural person under the U. S. Constitution. This has led to a horrific consequences, in that fictitious entities with limited liability have all the rights and privileges of citizens, and thus can purchase favorable legislation via Corporate Politics. Conspiracies by their very nature are not good news. And the lack of responsible and/or fiduciary duty by the Media and/or Public Education has contributed substantially to the success of whatever conspiracies might actually be a real and valid threat.

However, rather than concentrate on the evils of the evil empires of evil governments and their evil co-conspirators the world over, perhaps it would be preferable to accentuate the positive, and reduce the negative rumblings to a minimum. In other words, concentrate on a system of Justice and/or Restorative Justice (as opposed to law and order). It won’t be possible to totally eliminate any negative comments on the current State-of-affairs, if only because the reason and logic for doing things differently might not be self-evident as a means of avoiding problems.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:27 AM

Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth

it is very important to understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract bearing fruit" - meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the law never comes out and says so in so many words.

In this regard, children born to the contract regarded as "the contract bearing fruit," he said it is vitally important for parents to understand two doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis. Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country" or to state it more bluntly - the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930s Arizona Supreme Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State. This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take custody and control of its children - the parents are only conditional caretakers. [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.]

He also added a few more technical details. The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the State. Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife, in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business enterprise. The marriage contract acquires property through out its existence and over time, it is hoped, increases in value.

You can get around having a marriage license, by having a private ceremony and record the event in the family bible. Please pay close attention to the statement in bold about your children.

[edit on 28-4-2008 by sizzle]

[edit on 28-4-2008 by sizzle]

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:33 AM
If you are ever pulled over in a traffic stop and asked if you are the driver of the car; You might want to re-think your answer after reading this:
Are you sure you're a "driver"?

DRIVER. One employed...
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856

DRIVER-- one employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle..."

Driver - One employed in conducting or operating a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals, or a bicycle, tricycle, or motor car, though not a street railroad car. See Davis v. Petrinovich, 112 Ala. 654, 21 So. 344, 36 L.R.A. 615; Isaacs v. Railroad Co., 7 Am. Rep. 418, 47 N.Y. 122.
Black's Law Dictionary, 3rd Ed

DRIVER. One employed...
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed, 1951

“The activity licensed by state DMVs and in connection with which individuals must submit personal information to the DMV - the operation of motor vehicles - is itself integrally related to interstate commerce”.
Seth Waxman, Solicitor General
U.S. Department of Justice
Reno v. Condon, No. 98-1464, decided January 12, 2000
Supreme Court of the United States

Sec. 31. Definitions

When used in this chapter the term -

''Motor vehicle'' means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo;
Go here to read more:

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:37 AM
I too can teach you the hidden meanings behind US Laws for just 3 easy payments of 29.99!

And for a limited time I can throw in a stick of my amazing glu putty!

I'm sorry I just had those lines pop into my head when I read your header, it reminded me of an internet banner no offense.

These are some really interesting pieces of info, thanks for posting.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:40 AM
Do you really know what you are doing when you sign your child's birth certificate at the hospital? Read this:

Today, almost all mothers, black or white, unknowingly inform on their own babies. Take a look at the so-called "Birth Certificate" CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH where the mother signs and you will see the title of the box stating in small print:
"MOTHER OR OTHER INFORMANT". The word "OTHER" makes the mother "an informant." By signing the "Birth Certificate" as an informer, she contracts with the government putting her child and her child's future labor as collateral for the national debt (servitude--slavery). The father or mother can rescind the contract within three business days (Truth-in-Lending).

Since the Birth Certificate neither lists the father as the husband nor lists the wife's acceptance of the father's surname as her own but has the mothers maiden name instead, the baby is considered a BASTARD. Bastards are therefore under the care and control of the Priest Rule (democracy) and can be taken from the mother at any time.

The hospitals receive a fairly large monetary benefit ($3,000, more or less, per child) from the corporate government for having Birth Certificates filled out and signed.

On the birth certificate issue, you have three opt-outs. 1. You have three days to opt out after child is born. 2. You can refuse to sign, and register the baby's birth in your family bible. This is acceptable proof of birth. 3. You get one more chance at the age of 18; you have 30 days to opt out of the contract after your 18th birthday. But THEY never tell you this. Do THEY?

[edit on 28-4-2008 by sizzle]

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 02:59 AM
What about 'The Wizard of Oz?' How many of you thought that it was just a musical? How many thought that it was just a great classic movie, for entertainment purposes? Check out this concept for a different twist:

The initial setting of the story is, of course, Kansas, the geographical center of the USA, and the symbol for the heartland of America. The tornado (twister) that arrives is all about the whirling confusion that existed after the stock market crash, the theft of the country’s gold, the US Bankruptcy, and the Great Depression. The twister takes Dorothy and her dog, Toto, into a new, artificial dimension, above the solid ground of Kansas. Upon their arrival, Dorothy notes: “Toto, I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore.”

Right on, Dorothy. After the bankruptcy, Kansas was no longer “Kansas”, but now “KS”, an artificial corporate venue of the bankrupt US, a newly established “federal territory”, and part of the “Federal Zone”. Dorothy and Toto were “in this state”, which according to Redemption in Law, implies they were for tax jurisdiction purposes in the “District of Columbia” (aka “United States”) -- whereas Kansas is not included in “this state”, “KS” is.

One of the first entities Dorothy met was the Scarecrow, who represented the legal Straw Man which had been created as an artificial aspect of the former American sovereigns. The legal term, Straw Man, describes a fictitious or artificial person created by law at one’s birth via the inscription in all-capital letters on the birth document/certificate -- the latter being document of title and a negotiable instrument. It is allegedly by way of the Straw Man that the creditors of the US Bankruptcy can so effectively (and legally?) take for their own use the benefits of individuals’ labor, creativity, talents, and productivity.

Some of you might remember the thread that I did on, 'Capitas Diminutio Maximas. I see a lot of resemblance here. Pleas DO follow the link and read the rest of the Oz references. It just might surprise you.

[edit on 28-4-2008 by sizzle]

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 03:16 AM
Just wanted to insert an interesting tidbit. How many of you knew that the article # for the Social Security Number enactment was 666? It is Article #666.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 03:49 AM
Did you ever wonder why we are always having these little government-formed charades known as 'The War On...

The corporate government created in 1871 will continue to exist as long as:

1. "state of war" or "emergency" exists (War on Drugs, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Iraq, etc.),

2. the President does not terminate "martial" or "emergency" powers by Executive Order or decree, or

3. the people do not resist submission and terminate by restoring lawful civil courts, processes and procedures under authority of the "inherent political powers" of the people.

Well, there you have it. That's a little bit of food for thought.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:06 AM

People become surety for the debt by a number of different ways. One way is by a Birth Certificate when the baby's footprint is placed thereon before it touches the land. The certificate is recorded at a County Recorder, then sent to a Secretary of State which sends it to the Bureau of Census of the Commerce Department. This process converts a man's life, labor, and property to an asset of the US government when this person receives a benefit from the government such as a drivers license, food stamps, free mail delivery, etc. This person becomes a fictional persona in commerce. The Birth Certificate is an unrevealed "Trust Instrument" originally designed for the children of the newly freed black slaves after the 14th Amendment. The US has the ability to tax and regulate commerce.

The central banks now have a negotiable instrument against which credit is advanced by the international funding community, namely The World Bank, International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, Bank of England, Federal Bank of America etc.
As you can see, the birth certificate, signs you into slavery to the United States. You might want to do further research on Capitas Diminutio Maximas.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:10 AM

Bond Servant
To cover the debt in 1933 and future debt, the corporate government determined and established the value of the future labor of each individual in its jurisdiction to be $630,000. A bond of $630,000 is set on each Certificate of Live Birth. The certificates are bundled together into sets and then placed as securities on the open market. These certificates are then purchased by the Federal Reserve and/or foreign bankers. The purchaser is the "holder" of "Title." This process made each and every person in this jurisdiction a bond servant.

This gives a whole new meaning to the old saying, "Born with a price on your head."

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:13 AM

Inalienable rights
Rights from the corporate government
that can be liened against
or taken away at any time.
Very much like a 'privilege'.

Did you ever know what this word really meant? Or did you use it, thinking that it meant something good?

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:18 AM
Here's a little political info for you:


The "Electoral college of electors" are the ones that actually determine who will be President - not any popular vote, poll, media, or statistic.

An Elector
is Not subject to
exclusive legislative power
of Congress.
Almost anyone can become an elector.
Did not used to have to be a registered voter
or a party member.
Currently, there are 538 elector positions.
It now takes 270 Electoral Votes
to win the Presidential Election.

The total number of electors a state can have is equal to that state's total representation in Congress. Less populated states such as Wyoming, North Dakota, and Vermont have at least one Representative and two Senators. Therefore, they have only three electoral votes. California, for instance, with 52 Representatives and two Senators, have 54 electors.
Members of Congress or anyone holding any Federal office cannot be an elector based on what the Constitution refers to as: 'trust or profit.'
The Founding Fathers did not intend to have institutionalized party systems such as Democrats, Libertarians, and or Republicans.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:23 AM

Civil Law
based on the Roman Civil Law
Covers a vast number of volumes of text that even attorneys can't absorb or comprehend such as:

1. Regulations
2. Codes
3. Rules
4. Statutes

There are now over 60 million of these so-called laws on the books. Keep in mind "ignorance of the law is no excuse" Everyone must be guilty of something. The more so-called laws, the more revenue generated.
Prior to bankruptcy of 1933 "Public Law"
Now the so-called courts administer "Public Policy" through the "Uniform Commercial Code" (instituted in 1967)
Wow! The plot thickens. There will be more to come on this.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:26 AM

No stare decisis

Means no precedent binds any court, because they have no law standard of absolute right and wrong by which to measure a ruling—what is legal today
may not be legal tomorrow.

So-called "court decisions" are administrative opinions only and are basically decided on the basis of
"What is best for the corporate government."

Most so-called laws today don't protect you against them, but protects them against you.

This one really makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, doesn't it?

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:32 AM

Legal or Illegal

All legal actions are pursued under
the "color of law"

Color of law means
"appears to be" law, but is not

"Because of what appears to be lawful commands on the surface, many Citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance."
--United States Supreme Court in US. v. Minker ,
350 US 179 at 187 (1956)

This, 'color of law' stated here, has my attention. I intend to look into this further.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:35 AM

derived from re-present.
To present as someone else.
To re-present as the "Ens Legis"
a.k.a. STRAWMAN name
If you are represented, you are a ward of the court and are incompetent or a juvenile.

This terminology makes me a little nervous about ever being represented by an attorney again. LOL!

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:39 AM
Here is another interesting legal definition for you:

defined as a corporation, trust, partnership,...
"artificial legal entity"
All fictions
mirror-like identity recognizable in written form; usually in all caps
The word "person" originated from the Latin word "persona" derived from Etruscan "phersu" which means "mask."
Is the STRAWMAN masquerading
as the real man?

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:45 AM
This is a very interesting read, which gives you the other-side-of-the-coin, on hiring an attorney to represent you in a court-of-law. There is not much of this that is free to copy and paste; so you will have to go there to read it.

Why I believe one should not hire an attorney
“Should I hire an attorney?” is a question that each one must answer for themselves.
To make a quality decision, consider the following:

1. An attorney's first duty is to what or to whom? If We consult the latest Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) legal encyclopedia, volume 7, section 4, We will find that an attorney's
first duty is to the courts and the public; not the client:

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:52 AM
I really like this one. I have to wonder of the difference it would make, when used in certain cases:

"Guilty" until proven "not guilty"
(Especially, when faced with issues relating to the corporate government, its agents, and or its highwaymen.)
The so-called judge will ask if one is "guilty" or "not guilty." Always claim to be "innocent."
A "plea" enters one into a binding contract with the so-called court.

posted on Apr, 28 2008 @ 04:59 AM


Amendment IV

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Warrantless and unreasonable searches in homes, airports, corporate government facilities, on the roadways (highways), etc.

Government may search and seize Americans' papers and effects without probable cause to assist in so-called terror investigation. --Patriot Act

In Nazi Germany, It started with:
"Where's your papers?"
or "Your papers, please?!"

History repeats itself. Now, it is:

"ID, please?"

The I.D. called "Real ID" with biometrics is on the horizon and about to be implemented if not already.

Kinda gives you a feeling of Deja Vu, huh?

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in