Originally posted by Solace
I doubt any satellite have the ability to store enough energy to trigger an earthquake...

The weather map you posted does NOT show a deep low over the earthquake area, as the isobars are far too widely spaced, even considering the weather map snapshot is taken several hours after the earthquake...

Then there still is the matter of finding out whether there is a known fault in the area, which would seem quite possible, since earthquakes and faults are usually closely related...

My theory does not need the satellite to store a lot of power.. Actually that's why they would have to HAARP. HAARP directs the energy over the epicenter and the satellite shoots a plasma beam down to force the energy spiraling in the cloud into the crust.

I don't know weather maps, but pink/purple indicates extreme on that map. I thought that meant it was an extremely low pressure. If not what does the purple mean?

There are fault lines there.. I read which one specifically here is something referring to it though: "There is a region called the Illinois Basin-Ozark Dome region which includes a number of smaller fault lines."

The color code on the bottom is for precipitation. As stated, you'd have to look at the isobars (which measure pressure) for a reference of low pressure.
This just reaffirms that you are basing this all on conjecture, and you are unable to interpret this data correctly. I'm not trying to be rude. I believe HAARP is trying to manipulate weather, but the evidence doesn't support a causal relationship with earthquakes. Why doesn't the equally (or even more severe? I haven't looked up the back data) pressure system in Oregon/Washington cause an earthquake in that region, which is more seismically active?

Originally posted by _Del_
The color code on the bottom is for precipitation. As stated, you'd have to look at the isobars (which measure pressure) for a reference of low pressure.
This just reaffirms that you are basing this all on conjecture, and you are unable to interpret this data correctly. I'm not trying to be rude. I believe HAARP is trying to manipulate weather, but the evidence doesn't support a causal relationship with earthquakes. Why doesn't the equally (or even more severe? I haven't looked up the back data) pressure system in Oregon/Washington cause an earthquake in that region, which is more seismically active?

Well.. what does the purple mean over Illinois and Indiana?

How does that reaffirm I don't know how to interpret the Ionograms correctly?? It has nothing to do with these weather maps. Also.. I clearly state that I am only speculating at what exactly happened over the epicenter since there is only data directly above HAARP.
You must not understand the Ionograms at all. I could have sworn I explained them clearly enough to at least grasp what that mean. Do you understand the graphs? If not please bring someone in that can tell me I don't know what I'm saying before you call me stupid.



[edit on 28-4-2008 by danman23]

Originally posted by Solace

If you'd read my earlier posts on the subject, you'd find that a 960 millibar depression relieves the ground from some 315 pounds per square foot of pressure or about 8.8 BILLION pounds per square mile, if my back of the envelope calculations are correct. If the low pressure system is 40 miles in diameter, the total weight relief on the area is 1256 times greater or around 11 TRILLION pounds...

It doesn't take much imagination to figure out what would happen to a near surface fault under stress affected by such a substantial change in conditions...

WOW... can someone try to look up the exact number during the earthquake.. I'll look myself but it would be great if I got some help.

The low pressure center is about 500 miles wide. Now we just need to know the millibars.. anyone?? Again... Ill keep looking but it'd be great if I got some help.

Ok I found that the low pressure system was a result of the HAARP wave and plasma blast. (The 8 earthquakes that happened afterwards could have been a result of the low pressure though.) So I have dropped the low pressure as the main cause of the earth quake and am pretty sure they used the energy spiraling above the epicenter entering the earths crust to cause the earthquake.

3 possibilities:

1. There was a satellite above the epicenter that shot a burst of plasma into the center of the spiral to drive the energy into the ground which triggered the earthquake.

2. The Crane Naval base shot a plasma beam from the ground up at an angled "mirror" in the sky.. either a plane, satellite, helicopter or maybe even the ionosphere. The plasma bounced off the angled "mirror" and pushed the energy in the center of the spiral into the earth.

3. They "pulled" the energy out of the spiral cloud into the ground somehow. (HAARP can work underground too. I think there is a gold vein running south east from HAARP towards the US.. it is unnecessary for it to work but would obviously be a plus for them. I have to do some more research on all that though.)

I'm leaning towards 1 or 2 but 3 is possible. 2 is more probable than 1 due to the fact that satellites don't have much power.. or at least that is what solace said.. it would be good to see if there are any satellites equipped with plasma beam technology (or something similar to direct the energy into the earth.) and how much power they have... anyone? If there are none then it was more probably from Crane or they "pulled" it down. If it was a satellite I would think it would be the one they shot into an "unusable" orbit and say they don't use.


[edit on 28-4-2008 by danman23]

Could you please let me know what it looked like on last Wednesday? Around 12 noon Alaska time. I have a theory...