Pentagon DNA Evidence....Is it Possible?, page 2

reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

---

No Craig... Don't spin it to fit YOU.

Try explaining your way through your claims:

-Civilian Contractors planting bombs in the Pentagon

-Civilian Firefighters finding the bodies in the Pentagon

-DMORT made up of civilians assisting the body identification

-Shall I go on? You are not blaming the govenment Craig.




[edit on 17-3-2008 by CaptainObvious]

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

---

"I did see airplane seats and a corpse still strapped to one of the seats."

What don't you get? He saw him STRAPPED. You can't pick and choose ONLY what you want to fit. Thats not how it works.

I have a question:

If the passengers and crew were herded to the backs of the planes, did they have them "strap" in for the collision?

This contradicts the old "herded to the back of the planes" scenario IMO.

reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

---

I don't agree with your characterization of CO's post.

As an outside observer to your sparing with CO, it's obvious - at least to me - that you're not really interested in a debate. Your, IMO, more interested in playing semantic games.

You claim you had dinner with one of the principles in this post and that he can't keep his story straight. I assume you have a video of your interview, a transcript of the language used, or some other form of documentation other than your relation of the event?

IMO, claiming to use the scientific method is laughable. You claim to be a serious "investigator" but yet you ignore the overwhelming amount of evidence that demonstrates 9-11 was not an inside job because you say it's not relevant.

You mention that no trial would allow DNA evidence that was handled by defendant. You're wrong. But, that's not where the folly of logic stands. You're claiming that if any DNA evidence was collected, or tested, by "the man" then it is suspect. That's a strawman. It's a argument that can't possibly be addressed and you know it. That's why you make the argument. This is where conspiracy theories live. In the un-provable, the unattainable.

Since the DNA, in your mind, is totally suspect....can you prove any of it was tampered with? Have you investigated the chain-of-custody? The question wasn't have you read about the chain of custody, the question was have you, personally, investigated the chain-of-custody for the DNA samples? Have you interviewed those who "claim" to have done the testing? Where was the chain broken? Who broke the chain? How were the tests conducted? Who conducted the tests. Which protocol(s) did they use? What protocols were broken? Have you talked with those who took the samples you claim are somehow adulterated? Have you published a peer reviewed study on your findings? Where are your findings? What are the criticism of your findings, from your peer review? By your logic, is any DNA test sponsored by the government suspect? Who was "in on it" at the DNA testing facility? Which facility was used? Which day? These are but a few of the questions that should be explored.

Don't be absurd and claim your using the "scientific method" for anything. IMO, what you engage in is pseudo-science. If you think the DNA testing is suspect, great.

Prove it. Make your case.

reply to post by CaptainObvious

---

Huh?

What does any of that have to do with the topic?

The topic is in regards to an unverifiable claim that you ADMITTED you have no problem accepting proving you are perfectly willing to compromise the scientific method in order to accept the word of the government based on nothing but pure unadulterated faith.

Thanks for clarifying that for the readers of this forum. I give you props for publicly making such an admission.

reply to post by SlightlyAbovePar

---

The context of the conversation is set by the forum you are posting in which is "9/11 conspiracies".

So that means the suspect is the government.

Therefore all unverifiable evidence that was controlled and provided for solely by the suspect is invalid evidence to DISPROVE government involvement in the crime.

The alleged DNA evidence is unverifiable and therefore completely invalid when using the scientific method to determine government involvement in the event.

There is no way around this fact.

reply to post by Griff

---

Griff... Is there any statements that say that there were people standing? I am going by a statement by a person that WAS THERE. He saw a person STRAPPED in their seat.

CO

reply to post by CaptainObvious

---

Perhaps you don't understand what I am claiming.

My claim is that within the context of an investigation into government involvement of the 9/11 attacks, unverifiable evidence controlled and provided for by the suspect is automatically invalid evidence in support of the government story.

This is a fact.

You refuse the scientific method when considering government involvement and are completely satisfied to accept the unverifiable word of the government as proof they are innocent.

Again...I'm sure this is no great surprise to the readers.....it's just refereshing to have you admit it.

reply to post by COOL HAND

---

COOL,

There was a group dispatched to the Pentagon. The 311th Quartermaster Company (Mortuary Affairs), a U.S. Army Reserve unit from Aguadilla, Puerto Rico. The ones that "ain't playin" will see them as perps as well...

Within 72 hours of their departure from Puerto Rico, they were working side-by-side with the FBI in the Pentagon's north parking lot, sifting through tons of debris for the remains of victims. After completing that task, the company shifted operations to nearby Fort Myer, Virginia, and went to work identifying and cleaning personal effects to be returned to survivors and the families of victims.

americanhistory.si.edu...

Now...this was after a quick search. I will have to read through some other papers to find how personal items were used in idenfication.

Just to add...this is a diagram of the locations of remains in the Pentagon. (1st floor only)

the Bllue denotes Flight 77 remains. The yellow is Pentagon employees.

reply to post by Griff

---

Griff... WTF dude? Does finding one person strapped in mean they were ALL strapped in? I doubt it. I don't know who the victim was.

reply to post by Retikx

---

there is no video, because if you believe the Gov, then it looks like all they were prepared for was a Brinks Heist through the front door, nothing AERIAL and surely not anything to identify the AERIAL target!!

reply to post by Griff

---

Don't bring it up. Unless you can back it up.

99% of the flesh and bones were NOT recovered. All but 1 passengers were identified. 4 people in the Pentagon were not identified.

There is nothing that states 99% of the flesh and bones were discovered.

Did anyone see the Space Shuttle Columbia blow up on re-entry? Did anyone see pictures of the bodies or the remains?

NO!


COOL HAND...

Here is some more info for you...

The following approach was applied to the recovery of Pentagon Incident fatalities: When a victim was located, work in the area was halted to protect the body, personal belongings, and evidence. An FBI evidence team (one of several on constant standby in front of the collapse) would document the site and gather evidence. If physical extrication was required, a Rescue Squad from the assigned US&R task force was given this task. The next step in the process was a Military Mortuary Team who collected and removed the victim from the building.

All the debris removed from the building was spread out by the heavy equipment, and (on the signal of the IST US&R Specialist) the equipment would stop and Canine Search Teams from the US&R Task Forces would deploy across the material in search of any scent indicating human remains. Then US&R Search Team members would conduct a physical search for remains, crawling and walking over all the debris. Finally, after being searched three or more times, the debris would be loaded into trucks with skip loaders, where it would be taken to one of the Pentagon parking lots to be further combed for human remains and evidence by the FBI, ATF, Military units, and the Arlington Police Department. (p. 8)

www.ukfssart.org.uk...

reply to post by SlightlyAbovePar

---

I have to side with Craig. Clearly, the CIA is a murderous organization that has been involved with all kinds of nasty projects over the years. The U.S gov at one time planned "fake terrorism" in U.S cities, and there is involvement with Gladio which is "fake terrorism".

So to suspect the Gov, or the CIA is perfectly natural especially when you see they had no real interest in Bin laden, but Saddam and his OIL.

[edit on 17-3-2008 by talisman]

Flight 93 was headed for Building 7
  Posted 10 days ago with 48 member flags

9/11 INTERCEPTED
  Posted 2 days ago with 45 member flags

9/11: The WTC Elevator Key
  Posted 13 days ago with 43 member flags

WTC7, the smoking gun that just will not go away until the traiters are rounded up
  Posted 3 days ago with 35 member flags

What are your favorite 9/11 debunking tactics?
  Posted 6 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is the Joker on ATS radio now running their mouth?
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags

Was the government a co-conspirator?
  Posted 16 days ago with 9 member flags

British Police Want Us To Present False Flag Terror Evidence.
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: