Pentagon DNA Evidence....Is it Possible?, page 26

privacy

Pages: << 23 24 25 26 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times

reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 01:49 PM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Do I have video or photographic evidence of the removal of passengers from flight 93 inside the pentagon? Der... you know I don't.

So how can you claim there were passengers from Flight 77 in the Pentagon and go along with the official story?

reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 04:59 PM by CaptainObvious

reply to post by ULTIMA1

I can't. You win. 911 was an inside job!

reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 05:28 PM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
I can't. You win. 911 was an inside job!

I never said it was an inside job, why do you lie and misquote me?

I am looking for the truth of what happened that day anad asking people that believe the official story to post evidnece to support the official sotry, which so far no one has been able to do.

[edit on 23-4-2008 by ULTIMA1]

reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 05:39 PM by CaptainObvious

reply to post by ULTIMA1

I wasn't misquoting you.

Ultima tell me...you claim there isn't any evidence to support planes hitting the towers. This leads me to believe you are into TV fakery and holograms. If I am mistaken, please let me know.

reply posted on 23-4-2008 @ 08:57 PM by TheBobert

reply to post by ULTIMA1

Please read this article and let me know what you think
www.dcmilitary.com...

Here is another one
www.debunk911myths.org...

yet anohter
The DNA found on the first floor
www.debunk911myths.org...

please follow this link for whatever reason it wont link via the post a link function
www.dcmilitary.com...
[edit on 23-4-2008 by TheBobert]

[edit on 23-4-2008 by TheBobert]

[edit on 23-4-2008 by TheBobert]

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 01:29 AM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Ultima tell me...you claim there isn't any evidence to support planes hitting the towers.

Yes i am asking for evidence, that does not mean i stated their were no planes.

Do you understand the difference?

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 01:32 AM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by TheBobert
please follow this link for whatever reason it wont link via the post a link function

So i still do not see any evidence that states the pasengers from the plane were in the Pentagon.

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 07:49 AM by CaptainObvious

reply to post by ULTIMA1

Ultima... you saw the news? Remember the 2nd crash was live on TV. MILLIONS saw it. (including me)

Thousands saw it in NY with their own eyes.

Now knock off the hologram garbage.

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 01:31 PM by Damocles

CO, um...maybe its cuz i slept like crap last night and im just too tired to process info...but where did Ultima mention holograms?

im so confused...

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 01:52 PM by CaptainObvious

reply to post by Damocles

Damocles....

I am reading between the lines with his posts. He is asking for evidence that planes hit the towers.

I would assume he does not believe what he watched on TV. OR..... he could be stating that we wants proof that it was flight 11 ...etc....

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 01:57 PM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Ultima... you saw the news? Remember the 2nd crash was live on TV. MILLIONS saw it. (including me)

So you know what flight it was correct ? So show us your evidence of what flight hit the tower, oh thats right you cannot.

Stop the lies, i never stated anything about holograms. Why must you lie ?

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 02:42 PM by Damocles

reply to post by CaptainObvious

well, i guess i just read it different. i see it as he's just suggesting that we question what we saw in the absense of the official reports that are for some reason being withheld.

i know what i saw, i know what i was told, i know what others suggest. i form my opinions and go from there. i think (correct me if im wrong ultima, i hate putting words in anyones mouth) that he's simply suggesting that we dont take the govts word as fact unless they are willing to back it up with something substansive.

or i could be full of it...who knows.

reply posted on 24-4-2008 @ 04:27 PM by CaptainObvious

reply to post by ULTIMA1

read my above post Ultima.

I am not lying...I am assuming. Maybe if you would some day (it's been 6 years) tell me what you think happened on 911, I would stop my assumptions.

reply posted on 25-4-2008 @ 01:26 AM by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by CaptainObvious
I am not lying...I am assuming. Maybe if you would some day (it's been 6 years) tell me what you think happened on 911, I would stop my assumptions.

Well see your wrong already for assuming something instead of reading and understanding what i post.

Its been almost 7 years and i have yet to see any real evidence that supports the official story. In fact ther is more evindece that questions the official story then supports it.

I am also still wating for the evidence i have been asking you for. I am still wating for evindece of all the hijackers being dead and evidence of what planes hit the towers.

reply posted on 24-5-2008 @ 07:46 PM by Anonymous ATS

reply to post by Silly

A desk chair with a seat belt? And two desk chairs conected together?

Pages: << 23 24 25 26 >> ^^TOP^^