reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Who pays $1,000 per person per month for insurance may I ask?
I had a great plan at a job that was $40/month for a single person that included dental, top coverage and included a $100,000 life insurance policy.
So $800/year x 300,000,000 Americans = 240,000,000,000 (240 billion) a year to cover everyone. The Iraq war cost us a safe estimate of 12 billion a
month, 144,000,000,000. Of course family plans end up being cheaper per person, so for the cost of the war, we could insure every single American,
including the ones that have great coverage and the ones living on the street in a tent working 2 jobs who cannot afford it.
I think you need to use realistic figures before making statements like that. $1000 a month per person :roflmao:
If doctors did it for their passion of caring for humanity, then 100k a year would be more than enough money to make, consider most doctors make way
more than that, capping their salary would solve half the cost. Not letting them charge a grand a night for a room would help too.
The nurses and doctors I know say that uninsured poor people are why costs have risen, and they don't blame them. Since they can't afford health
care, on of two things happens. They either go to the emergency room for little things since they cannot be denied, and run up a bill they will never
be able to pay back ... or they forego checkups because they can't afford them, get seriously ill and go to the emergency room and run up a bill
they can't pay, because they are broke and making 10 grand a year, barely paying bills, and now they are sick, are not making even that measly pay
check.
These people I know also have no problem with making 100k a year, the rest is for spoils and splurging.
So, let us say a modest $20/month/person x 300 million. That is only 6 billion a month, half the cost of the Iraq war ... though, that isn't free
money ... so what we must do is get back to the years 1999 and 2000 when we were paying 360 billion dollars off of our national debt instead of
increasing it. So, 72 billion of that would go to 'free' national health care. That would still leave more than a trillion a decade being paid off
without further reducing government spending wastes. In a century we would have a national savings account in the trillions instead of a national
debt in the trillions.
Too bad that is in the past and we have pseudo-conservatives that spend money and inflate the government. Even if you don't like Bill Clinton, at
least he paid off over half a trillion off of our national debt before he left office. With that said, I don't like Hilary nor her fascism and
control.