It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rationalgaze
Everyone will soon know how twisted anon really is. I would go so far as to say they've revolutionized dehumanization.
Originally posted by rationalgaze
I know you didn't read the thread but I made the same point earlier. The good of anonymous is in the vast, vast minority (like me) and the rest are all blithering retards.
Originally posted by rationalgaze
The good of anonymous is in the vast, vast minority (like me) and the rest are all blithering retards.
2) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, hateful and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.
2g.) Board Wars: You will not use these boards to organize "attacks" on other boards, blogs, or discussion groups, and similarly, you will not organize such attacks against this board
Originally posted by undo
i'm not anon, so i can speak for myself, and it's not hypocracy if i believe you have the right not only to practice your religion, but to do so without fear of being killed for it or otherwise hampered from the full function of your freedoms. i expect the same in return. that's not asking too much and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
Originally posted by helatrobus
Originally posted by undo
i'm not anon, so i can speak for myself, and it's not hypocracy if i believe you have the right not only to practice your religion, but to do so without fear of being killed for it or otherwise hampered from the full function of your freedoms. i expect the same in return. that's not asking too much and no one will ever convince me otherwise.
It's really hard to understand exactly what you are saying. Can you set out the points you are trying to say and give concrete examples in relation to topic at hand, if possible?
I think she's agreeing with us. I wouldn't mind a further elaboration, however, to whatever extent would remain approximately on-topic for the thread.
Originally posted by helatrobus
Originally posted by Anonymous13
I think she's agreeing with us. I wouldn't mind a further elaboration, however, to whatever extent would remain approximately on-topic for the thread.
It's hard to say. There is some oscillating between thought.
Originally posted by Anonymous13
I suspect it's more abbreviation than oscillation. She had earlier observed the potential for violence in any policy Scientology may have to convert the entire planet. Hence, perhaps, the emphasis on the right to practice one's own religion without being killed for it (e.g., by Scientology). Perhaps a thread on the point of planetary conversion should be started, probably on one of our own forums, and perhaps here, as well, if any are interested.
yeppers. the potential for violence? the texts say there will be violence unless every person is above "2" or whatever that is. 2's are just bumped off, quietly and without remorse. that's so hitler.
Jack Parson's and the Curious Origins of the American Space Program
www.aci.net...
How does all this tie together? Well, since things like that link are based almost entirely on hearsay, it's really difficult to say. The only parts that are bsed on any verifiable reality are the documents and historical events such as the founding of Jet Propulsion Laboratories.
"Had L. Ron Hubbard lived in more primitive times, before the mass media
(which he feared) and the information superhighway (which his successors
fear), he certainly would have succeeded."
--Former Scientologist describing Hubbard's closed system methodology.
Originally posted by helatrobus
Are you saying mr.old.school and his backers tried to start another hoax here? It runs very similar to what happened on that thread.
Bill, I'd suggest if you want to stop this kind of thing, would be to put a warning on the front page that this may be a hoax. I'd suggest it somewhere the google bots will pick it as text if you know what i mean? That should stop them.