It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by jedimiller
Depends on the church, doesn't it? I've been to a few churches. I've walked out of about half of them in disgust.
Originally posted by jedimiller
1. Horror movies
Originally posted by jedimiller
you guys also focus too much on the conquistas. that was Catholism. And, yes they did horrid things.
Originally posted by encoder
we fear god because others than behold a power over us in the false name of his. and the others keep the power and the name.
Originally posted by jedimiller
All horror films are evil. Why is it ok to see someone get cut up and killed in a horror movie but not in real life? Because those movies, video games and things of violence in the media are the pure evil. not religion. You don't see pastors telling people to go kill and spread pure evil. But in films you do see that.
Originally posted by danx
Intelligent Design? You mean Creationism don't you?
He has not done any original work on the subject and he has not fairly represented the work of his colleagues." Rather, Dawkins has subjected his atheist readers to "sleights of hand." He has produced a "diatribe against religion" that is "deeply misinformed." Indeed he is "just another angry atheist trading on his reputation as an evolutionst and spokesperson for science to vent his personal opinions about religion."
We note that this discussion is focused on living organisms that, obvious, already exist. In other words, we are far away from why there is something instead of nothing and how life came to be in the first place: we already have a digital code—we have an illusion of design. But why call such obvious design an illusion? The design is so obvious that atheists, in the guise of science, have to talk themselves, and their students, into not engaging the issue in an honest and intelligent manner:
Richard Dawkins, “The Blind Watchmaker,” p. 1,
“Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.”
Francis Crick, “What Mad Pursuit,” p. 138,
“Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”
“it’s not useful to challenge an individual biologist’s ingenuity in thinking up what particular intermediates might have looked like because we don’t…I mean maybe we’re not ingenious enough to think what they arewe shouldn’t in any case be saying, ‘Oh, I can’t think what the explanation for it is, therefore it must have been designed.’ There’s a fatal weakness in any argument which says, ‘I cannot understand how X could have happened, therefore it must have been designed’[…]It’s that element of giving up. It’s that element of defeatism. Saying, ‘I can’t understand how it works. Well, let’s fall back on the design explanation.’”
“Chance, luck, coincidence, miracle…events that we commonly call miracles are not supernatural, but are part of a spectrum of more-or-less improbable natural events. A miracle, in other words, if it occurs at all, is a tremendous stoke of luck.”
“It is as though, in our theory of how we came to exist, we are allowed to postulate a certain ration of luck.”