It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by space cadet
I am an American, and I watched live television as the events of 911 unfolded, I had family in both Washington and New York. Airplanes, not drones, not military, just regular passenger planes hit the WTC. It was horrific.
Originally posted by space cadet
There is real evidence. And no I do not believe everything I see or hear on television. I had family in New York. I had 3 family members who stood below the planes and saw them hit the buildings. They saw passenger planes.
Originally posted by space cadet
I am sorry , but if it takes debate to make you understand that what you saw really happened, and it happened the way you saw it, then I feel really sorry for you.
Originally posted by space cadetAnd do you REALLY believe the buildings didn't even fall? Let me tell you dear, they did fall down.
Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11," Singh said. "Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA -- that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything -- it would have been Ptech along with MITRE."
Singh has spoken extensively about Ptech's alleged connections with Saudi Arabia, for example with Pacifica Radio in 2005:
"Maybe those organizations don’t fully know who their masters are. And Ptech is the one thread, the one golden thread you pull on and all of this is unraveled, because it goes into the corporations, it goes into these government entities, it goes into the terrorism financing entities that were, that none of which have been, by the way, taken to task. There are just so many questions about what does this all mean. And as we investigated, as I investigated further, we found that the origins of Ptech were very interesting – where did this company come from obviously is the first question. And how did they get to be so powerful, who were the people, who were the organizations that brought them in, who knew, who gave them the power?"
Ptech software "is utilized at the highest levels of almost every government and military and defense organization in this country," Singh said, "including the Secret Service, the FBI, the Department of Defense, the House of Representatives, the Treasury Department, the IRS, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force, and, last but not least, the Federal Aviation Administration."
I found it hard to believe that the most sensitive government and military computers would run enterprise software from a Lebanese-owned start-up company called Ptech from Quincy, Mass. All the talk about the Saudi-financier behind Ptech being linked to Osama bin Laden smelled like a "cut out" to me.
It simply did not make sense that the most secure computer systems of the U.S. government would be running software written by a Lebanese Muslim financed by a Saudi who happened to be on the most-wanted list of global terrorists.
When I turned my attention to Ptech, I soon discovered that the real key person involved in the development of the company was a Zionist Jewish lawyer named Michael Goff from Worcester, Mass. Goff also worked for an Israeli-run computer security company called Guardium. This confirmed my suspicion that Ptech was probably an Arab "cut out" controlled by the Mossad, and that Goff was their point man in Ptech.
Originally posted by IvanZana
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by ULTIMA1
How does being able to make an airliner crash equate into being able to take over and remotely control it?
How did they fly into the World Trade Center and Pentagon using radar or whatever magical technology that is implied to be used?
The only thing magical is your sense of logic when it comes to your baseless comments.
But really, Boone if you watched the video and read the evidence presented you would ask for an appology for your ignorance in these threads.
here is a video to refresh remote control technology be implemented in the 1940's, yes, 65+ years ago. I think It would be fair to say they have improved the technology to say the least.
[edit on 22-2-2008 by IvanZana]
You're funny!
originally posted by IvanZana
The only thing magical is your sense of logic when it comes to your baseless comments.
But really, Boone if you watched the video and read the evidence presented you would ask for an appology for your ignorance in these threads.