It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DID ISRAEL Electronically Hijack the 9/11 PLANES?

page: 1
27
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 09:56 AM
link   
THE COMPUTER CRIMES BEHIND 9-11




The dependence of the U.S. government and military on computer systems, which run on software provided by outside vendors, is the Achilles' heel of the world's most powerful nation. 9-11 was clear proof of that fundamental weakness and vulnerability.



9-11 was a computer crime. Apart from being a monstrous crime of mass murder and false flag terrorism, 9-11 was also a sophisticated computer crime, carried out through long-term foreign infiltration of the most sensitive U.S. military and government computer networks.



This infiltration, carried out by a foreign intelligence agency, gave the perpetrators of 9-11 "real-time" access to all the data on the computers of the U.S. government and military. On 9-11, this "super-user" access to the data of the most critical government computer networks gave the terrorists the ability to thwart the military response to the emergency as it developed.



Most importantly, the terrorists who committed 9-11 through their "super-user" access to the most critical computer networks of the U.S. government still have that access. The evidence indicates that this infiltration was carried out by the military intelligence agency of the State of Israel.

PTECH & 9-11



The subject of computer sabotage in relation to the aerial attacks of 9-11 was brought to the fore by Indira Singh, who spoke at early 9-11 truth events organized by Kyle Hence.




During these early 9-11 "truth" events, a small Massachusetts-based software company called Ptech was brought up by Singh, who sought to link it to Arab terrorists.



Ptech was said to be a start-up company from Quincy, Mass. whose software was loaded onto the most sensitive computer systems across the U.S. government, including those of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Air Force, two agencies whose systems failed miserably on 9-11.



Singh, a senior consultant with JP Morgan Chase on 9-11, is described as a "whistle-blower" because of her revelations about Ptech's involvement with the critical computer systems that failed on 9-11.



"Ptech was with MITRE Corporation in the basement of the FAA for two years prior to 9/11," Singh said. "Their specific job is to look at interoperability issues the FAA had with NORAD and the Air Force in the case of an emergency. If anyone was in a position to know that the FAA -- that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything -- it would have been Ptech along with MITRE."



Please read more here www.bollyn.com...





Here is a youtube video from fox news. A great story on how Israel was involved in 9/11.




Here is a video of Israelis that ADMITTED that there were hired to Document 9.11.



Lots of Israeli Links to 9.11.

This person Daniel Lewin who was not only Israeli but he was the first alledgedly "Shot/Stabbed" on FLIGHT 11 that crashed into WTC 1. He was part of the World's most ELITE anti-Hijacking team and multi-billionaire owner of AKAMAI.

Daniel M. Lewin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Daniel "Danny" Mark Lewin (Hebrew: דניאל (דני) מארק לוין; May 14, 1970 – September 11, 2001) was a mathematician and entrepreneur, best known for co-founding internet company Akamai Technologies.

Lewin was born in Denver, Colorado and raised in Jerusalem, where he served for four years in the Israel Defence Forces. He was an officer in Sayeret Matkal, an elite and secretive intelligence unit.

He attended the Technion university in Haifa, Israel while simultaneously working at IBM's research laboratory in Haifa. While at IBM, he was responsible for developing the Genesys system, a processor verification tool that is used widely within IBM and in other companies such as AMD and SGS Thompson.

en.wikipedia.org...




"Our purpose was to document the event"





[edit on 18-2-2008 by IvanZana]

[edit on 18-2-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 09:57 AM
link   
Here is a video about Darpa and PTECH's connection to 9.11




posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 09:59 AM
link   
Here is some sources
Mendelson, Udi, U.S. Aviation Technology documents

us-aviation-technology.com... or


www.bollyn.info...
(see pp. 44 -50 regarding the key personnel)




Mendelson, Udi, U.S. Aviation Technology, Aircraft Security & Safety Enhancement
bollyn.info...




U.S. Aviation Technology LLC on Israel Venture Capital website:

www.ivc-online.com...



Monte Belger on Israel Venture Capital website:

www.ivc-online.com...


Peter Goelz on Israel Venture Capital website:

www.ivc-online.com...

Related files for Christopher Bollyn's 9-11 research
www.matrixfiles.com...



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 10:06 AM
link   


Proof that Israel was part of 9.11



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 10:29 AM
link   
great!! You have been posting a lot of great information. I think that it is possible that Israel did what you are suggesting, you cannot rule it out.



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 10:51 AM
link   
Great thread Ivan! s/f'd

And of course let us not forget this other little tidbit:

Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job


Man who set up Operation Gladio tells Italy's largest newspaper attacks were run by CIA, Mossad

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, December 4, 2007

Former Italian President and the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio Francesco Cossiga has gone public on 9/11, telling Italy's most respected newspaper that the attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies....

....Cossiga's new revelations appeared last week in Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper, Corriere della Sera. Below appears a rough translation.

"[Bin Laden supposedly confessed] to the Qaeda September [attack] to the two towers in New York [claiming to be] the author of the attack of the 11, while all the [intelligence services] of America and Europe ... now know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the CIA American and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ... in Iraq [and] Afghanistan."

Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9/11 in 2001, and is quoted in Webster Tarpley's book as stating that "The mastermind of the attack must have been a “sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and flight security personnel.”


The fact that he is an ex head of state with an excellent reputation, and directly took part in Operation Gladio speaks volumes. He can't be called just another conspiracy theorist crackpot.


Cossiga's revelations contributed to an Italian parliamentary investigation of Gladio in 2000, during which evidence was unearthed that the attacks were being overseen by the U.S. intelligence apparatus.

In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, "You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ... the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security."


It has always bothered me that more attention has not been paid to this man's statements.

[edit on 18-2-2008 by TrueAmerican]



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 03:41 PM
link   
There is another, perhaps competing, theory of the "electronic hijacking" of the airplanes.

This one is put forward by David Hawkins.

www.hawkscafe.com...

His website has a lot of material explaining his theory, but a two part audio conversation he had with Eric Hufschmid on a radio show has been removed. In the conversation he went into a lot of detail about his theory and named a lot of names.

There are other audio interviews that can be found on the site. There is one with George Noory and one with someone named Dr. Joe Hawkins. These are also worth listening to.

David Hawkins is an artificial intelligence specialist and now refers to himself as a forensic economist. He is not a lightweight, holds a post graduate degree from Cambridge in the UK and has worked in the oil industry.

He currently lives in Canada and believes that there is a strong Canadian componment to this whole story. In their conversation, Eric Hufshmid repeatedly tried to lead him to Israeli collusion in 9/11, but Hawkins says that his evidence just doesn't lead that way.

Here is a powerpoint style presentation of his views on how 9/11 was carried out.

WARNING: There is an extremely graphic photo of a WTC jumper lying on the pavement at the end of the presentation.


Google Video Link


[edit on 18-2-2008 by ipsedixit]



posted on Feb, 18 2008 @ 04:40 PM
link   
People normally think of politics and crime as two different kinds of activity. When they overlap a "scandal" is produced. In recent years investigative reporters have found that the overlap between the two types of activity is getting ever larger. It is almost as if two galaxies were being observed to begin to merge with one another. Up to now only in James Bond novels do we meet the criminal monster with the global reach.

David Hawkins believes that 9/11 is an example of this type of gargantuan criminal enterprise, and the geopolitical fallout, the wars, etc. though important, are really secondary to an accurate understanding of the methods of the major players. Who could imagine our corporate and government leaders as out and out racketeers? Unfortunately there is a precedent for seeing them this way as the following excerpt from the Paul Thompson 9/11 Timeline shows:

www.cooperativeresearch.org...


Investigative journalist Joseph Trento will later report that in 1976, the Safari Club, a newly formed secret cabal of intelligence agencies (see September 1, 1976-Early 1980s), decides it needs a network of banks to help finance its intelligence operations. Saudi Intelligence Minister Kamal Adham is given the task. “With the official blessing of George H. W. Bush as the head of the CIA, Adham transformed a small Pakistani merchant bank, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), into a world-wide money-laundering machine, buying banks around the world to create the biggest clandestine money network in history.” BCCI was founded in 1972 by a Pakistani named Agha Hasan Abedi, who was an associate of Adham’s. Bush himself has an account at BCCI established while still director of the CIA. French customs will later raid the Paris BCCI branch and discover the account in Bush’s name. [Trento, 2005, pp. 104] Bush, Adham, and other intelligence heads work with Abedi to contrive “a plan that seemed too good to be true. The bank would solicit the business of every major terrorist, rebel, and underground organization in the world. The intelligence thus gained would be shared with ‘friends’ of BCCI.” CIA operative Raymond Close works closely with Adham on this. BCCI taps “into the CIA’s stockpile of misfits and malcontents to help man a 1,500-strong group of assassins and enforcers.” [Trento, 2005, pp. 104] Soon, BCCI becomes the fastest growing bank in the world. Time magazine will later describe BCCI as not just a bank, but also “a global intelligence operation and a Mafia-like enforcement squad. Operating primarily out of the bank’s offices in Karachi, Pakistan, the 1,500-employee black network has used sophisticated spy equipment and techniques, along with bribery, extortion, kidnapping and even, by some accounts, murder. The black network—so named by its own members—stops at almost nothing to further the bank’s aims the world over.” [Time, 7/22/1991]
Entity Tags: Kamal Adham, Agha Hasan Abedi, Bank of Credit and Commerce International, George Herbert Walker Bush, Raymond Close, Central Intelligence Agency, Safari Club
Category Tags: Soviet-Afghan War, Pakistan and the ISI, Saudi Arabia, Terrorism Financing, BCCI



[edit on 18-2-2008 by ipsedixit]



posted on Feb, 19 2008 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Here is some remote control technology being used in WW2.



posted on Feb, 20 2008 @ 11:24 PM
link   
Why is no one filtering through this.

Can anyone debunk this information?



posted on Feb, 21 2008 @ 12:05 AM
link   
I have read and believe that the Israeli's and the Bush Bandits had the most to gain from this disaster. I believe there was a joint planning effort but that then the Israeli's were left to carry it out. Our government has never answered any significant questions about the event and it is quite clear they have something to hide. Only through the efforts of indepedent people can we ever learn the truth. Those seeking the truth I salute you. You are the true patriots who seek to bring the perperators to justice What greater good could this event possible served, so we could drive our cars for a few more hours? So someone could usher in the end times? Nothing is worth even one innocent Americans life and certainly nothing that could be conceived by that cretin president or his ill begotten minions. The US government was complicit if one looks at the facts it is hard to conclude otherwise.



posted on Feb, 21 2008 @ 07:32 AM
link   
reply to post by polanksi
 

If you go on the internet you can find a lot of media presenting a side of the American story that is not often told. It is a story of mischief and murder in little, far flung places, where people aren't able to defend themselves.

America's assault on Iraq has crossed the line for many people. It is now possible to speak of the American geopolitical strategy and the Nazi geopolitical strategy in the same sentence.

If America attacks Iran, that will settle the issue. America must not attack Iran. I'm no friend of Muslim fundamentalism, but the world will not put up with an attack on Iran. The world may not be able to do anything to stop America militarily, but America can kiss the hearts and minds of the people in the ROW (rest of the world) goodbye.



[edit on 21-2-2008 by ipsedixit]



posted on Feb, 21 2008 @ 10:04 AM
link   
IvanZana:


First of all why is it Israel? Why not Japan, India, France, Poland, Brazil, Germany, Russia, China or any other country for that matter? Second of all explain to me who this electronic takeover would happen.

[edit on 21-2-2008 by AMTMAN]



posted on Feb, 22 2008 @ 01:53 AM
link   
Israeli Mosad Behind Sharn al-Shaykh Airliner's Crash

GMP20040121000197 Cairo Al-Usbu in Arabic 19 Jan 04 p 1

According to the information, the Mosad elements tried to impede the takeoff of the aircraft so that they could act and obtain the notepad. Having failed, they resorted to advanced Israeli computer capabilities to control the plane, especially that Sharm al-Shaykh is not very far from Israeli sites equipped with these capabilities. This way they managed to remote control the airliner and plunge it into the Red Sea immediately after it had taken off.

Communications expert Muhammad al-Tahir who participated in jamming lots of hostile stations, says that Sharm al-Shaykh airport's proximity to the Red Sea, and the presence of a great number of yachts and private vessels at the harbor, arouse suspicion that the scheme was willfully executed.

The Egyptian expert sees that one of the yachts in the sea could be equipped with electronic jamming devices and instruments that direct certain vibrations at the planes when they take off, especially that the airport is very near to the sea.

The communications expert who has spent over 44 years in this field says: "The jamming caused by vibrations aimed direct at the plane could make the pilot lose control of the airliner, which is corroborated by foreign eyewitnesses who saw the entire plane plunge suddenly into the sea".



posted on Feb, 22 2008 @ 06:44 PM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


Is this your evidence? An unlinked press release that provides no supporting information?



posted on Feb, 22 2008 @ 07:22 PM
link   
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 


Do you have the link?

How does being able to make an airliner crash equate into being able to take over and remotely control it?

How did they fly into the World Trade Center and Pentagon using radar or whatever magical technology that is implied to be used?



posted on Feb, 22 2008 @ 10:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by ULTIMA1
 




How does being able to make an airliner crash equate into being able to take over and remotely control it?

How did they fly into the World Trade Center and Pentagon using radar or whatever magical technology that is implied to be used?



The only thing magical is your sense of logic when it comes to your baseless comments.

But really, Boone if you watched the video and read the evidence presented you would ask for an appology for your ignorance in these threads.

here is a video to refresh remote control technology be implemented in the 1940's, yes, 65+ years ago. I think It would be fair to say they have improved the technology to say the least.



[edit on 22-2-2008 by IvanZana]



posted on Feb, 23 2008 @ 03:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Boone 870

Do you have the link?

How does being able to make an airliner crash equate into being able to take over and remotely control it?


Its a open source government document.

Well this is just 1 document. There are other reports and links that show that taking over a airliner by remote control is possible.

For instance the British have a system in 1 of thier Tornado fighters that can take over the contols of a hijacked plane by remote control.



[edit on 23-2-2008 by ULTIMA1]



posted on Feb, 23 2008 @ 03:12 AM
link   
reply to post by IvanZana
 


Good question. I dunno... it's touchy stuff, not something to wade into casually and its too late tonight. .

Good presentation, lots of info in one spot so I'll come back to it. There certainly are a lot of connections to Israel/Israelis/Mossad/etc... But I'm not so sure on a coherent pattern. If nothing else all this might provide some kind of 'noise' to help obscure other operations. I recall Ruppert mentioning the Amdocs story on Fox News having been fed straight from Dick Cheney... many levels.



posted on Feb, 23 2008 @ 03:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Boone 870
 

Hello again! Fun times at LCF, eh?
In this case, a plane was crashed remotely. That means it was controlled remotely, right? Replace "Red Sea" with "Tower 1" Could it also have flown it over somewhere else, looped around, and landed or crashed there? Dunno, didn't read the thing. But remote controlling planes has been possible since the 70s, hasn't it? Don't they do auto-landings all the time? Is RC tech for airliners magical? Raytheon, 727, six takeoffs and landings with not a soul on board - Aug 23 2001. Etc...

Not saying that's what happened, but aside from the complications it raises (phone calls primarily), it seems feasable to me.



new topics

top topics



 
27
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join