It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
The only thing that keeps me curious about this piece is that it
a) Contains a writing that is not known and does not have any known equivalent in the world
b) There seem to be some scholars that say america had elephants afterall: Men and Elephants in America...this would coindide with the mormon belief that elephants existed in the americas...12 000 years ago.
c) As far as I can tell nobody has actually bothered to examine it.
In 1934, W. D. Strong published a significant article summarizing
numerous North American Indian traditions suggesting historical
knowledge of the mammoth.⁴² Strong divided these traditions into
two groups: (1) “ ‘myths of observation,’ ” so called because they were
based upon “the observation of fossil bones, objects which would appear
to have always excited human interest,” and (2) actual “ ‘historical
traditions,’ [which] seem to embody a former knowledge of the living
animals in question, perhaps grown hazy through long oral transmission.”
⁴³ It is this later group of traditions that tends to support the
idea of late survival of the mammoth or mastodon. These traditions,
which can be found among Native Americans from the Great Lakes
region to the Gulf of Mexico, led Ludwell H. Johnson to conclude not
only that man and elephant had coexisted, but that the mammoth and
the mastodon may have survived until as late as 2000 bc in certain
regions of North America.⁴⁴
Other scholars have discussed pictographic evidence of trunked
animals found at several sites in North America and also in Mayan
codices and other artistic representations found in Mesoamerica and
Central America. Zoologist W. Stempel claimed on the basis of such
a representation at Copan that these could not be tapirs, but that the
images must represent mammoths.⁴⁵ No less an authority than Eric
Thompson found some of these elephantine-like representations to be
“a difficult thing to be explained away by non-believers.”⁴⁶ In 1930,
an “elephant-like” stone statue was discovered near the Tonolá River
on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.⁴⁷ Although certainly not definitive,
such evidence may be suggestive of the late survival of mammoths
or mastodons into this tropical region of southern Mexico, for which
Sorenson and others have suggested links between the Olmec cultural
tradition and the Jaredites.
In 1993, three Russian archaeologists announced the discovery
that a species of dwarf mammoth had survived until as recently as
two thousand years ago on Wrangel Island in the Siberian Arctic.⁴⁸
Oddly, Larson feels that this remarkable discovery has no relevance
to the question of the elephant in the Book of Mormon. Instead, he
writes that “the evidence that neither the mammoth nor the mastodon
of North America survived the last Ice Age is strong” (p. 188). But his
statement misses the mark on several counts. Mammoths were not
supposed to have survived so late anywhere, yet a minority of scholars
have suggested that some few species of elephant may have survived
in scattered or isolated regions into relatively recent historical times.
As the Russian archaeologists noted in one report, “hardly anyone has
doubted that mammoths had become extinct everywhere by around
9,500 years before present”; however, these new discoveries “force this
view to be revised.”⁴⁹ And if the mastodon did survive into recent historical
times in one place, it is not unreasonable to suppose that it might
have survived, in at least limited numbers, in other regions as well.
"T
region to the Gulf of Mexico, led Ludwell H. Johnson to conclude not ... 44. Ludwell H. Johnson III, "Men and Elephants in America," Scientific Monthly 75 ...
farms.byu.edu...
Originally posted by Harte
I defy anyone to show me where any "million pound" stone has been "dragged for miles" over rugged terrain.
These three stone blocks are the largest building blocks ever used by any human beings anywhere in the world. Each one is 70 feet long, 14 feet high, 10 feet thick, and weigh around 800 tons. This is larger than the incredible columns created for the Temple of Jupiter, which are also 70 feet tall but measure a mere 7 feet -- and they weren't constructed from single pieces of stone. In each of the above two images, you can see people standing by the trilithon to provide reference for how large they are: in the top image a person is standing to the far left and in the bottom image a person is sitting on a stone about in the middle.
As impressive as these three stone blocks are, though, there is a fourth block still in the quarry which is three feet longer than the blocks in the trilithon and which is estimated to weigh 1,200 tons.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
I can in a way even believe that these massive blocks where cut out by the people in that timeframe, but it is impossible for me to accept that these people where also capable of "dragging them for miles" with whatever human tool they had in that timeframe over rugged terrain, and put them together as shown in the pictures.
The temple was begun in the last quarter of the 1rst century B.C., and was nearing completion in the final years of Nero's reign (37-68 A.D.). the Great Court Complex of the temple of Jupiter, with its porticoes, exedrae, altars and basins, was built in the 2nd century A.D. Construction of the so-called temple of Bacchus was also started about this time.
The Propylaea and the Hexagonal Court of the Jupiter temple were added in the 3rd century under the Severan Dynasty (193-235 A.D.) and work was presumably completed in the mid-3rd century. The small circular structure known as the Temple of Venus, was probably finished at this time as well.
Originally posted by ElectroMagnetic Multivers
In mainstream anything, not just archeology, the answers seem, to me, to be too simplified, even if it is 1000's of people draggin one, OF MANY, stones, maybe the logs theory?, how about pushing this up a 5 degree incline, let alone the 20-30 degrees proposed? doesn't sit right with me, sorry.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by spacevisitor
Whats more: How many buildings that stable and massive to we build nowdays?
Our most impressive and expensive buildings fall with the crash of an airplane.
I don’t know if 9/11 wouldn’t have destroyed those huge blocks of stone.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by spacevisitor
You think the buildings in NYC (such as WTC) are similarily stable to this?
Originally posted by merka
This is compared to the Great Pyramid which took 25-ish years if I remember correctly.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
,
No, it is my personal opinion, after studying a very great amount of the available information in the form of articles, interviews, pictures and videos, that I don’t believe that the real reason why the WTC buildings one and two collapsed in the way it happened, was due by the crash of those airplanes only.