It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The sole purpose of a gun is to kill. It emits a pellet of metal whose function is to penetrate flesh and cause damage to humans and animals. It has no other function
Originally posted by andre18
you would also see a drastic uptick in crime rates involving knives, bats,
Yeah, there actually is a lot of that kind of stuff in Australia, gangs going around with knives and bats and stuff......but can you honestly tell me you'd rather guns in the hands of gangs then bats and knives.....?
For one......you get shot, you're basically dead.....you get stabbed, a few weeks in hospital should heal you up, a bat causes a few broken bones and a few months in hospital.....but that's better then death...is it not.....?
You’re far more likely to die from a gun, then you are from a knife or bat...
Originally posted by hidatsa
People choose to use guns to defend themselves because if you point a gun at someone, that someone will instantly appreciate the deadliness of the object that's aimed at them, if not necessarily of the person aiming it. They know it isn't likely to tickle them or nudge them or speak harshly to them, it's probably going to kill them. There are, sadly, a great many people who feel they cannot protect themselves without killing someone else. Their lives are, of course, of far more value than their victims'. As is their property, naturally.
Originally posted by seagull I have, however, badly hurt people in my time.
Originally posted by seagull reply to post by hidatsa[/url]
No actually he doesn't. He does have a viewpoint that most don't. That doesn't make other views any less valid for all of that. I respect his views. I also respect the view points of people who haven't shot at, or shot, someone.
Originally posted by andre18
I know what you mean about the military being useless and worthless. I agree..we should never have sent the military to the tsunami areas in the Pacific a couple of years back. We should have sent no one or nothing. This is not a job for our military which should be shut down. I am sure private doctors and private institutions would gladly give up their profit and take up the tsunami survivors!!!
Ok...so I basically understand what you're saying......but when it comes to things like the tsunami disaster.....you don't send people with guns to such places.....you send food aid, doctors, builders, etc anyone but people who specializes in the art of killing.......who know how to kill someone like it's second nature.....Just tell me how such people can help such a disaster...