It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OptionToChoose
No. Why do you ask that? Is that the only way to perceive what I wrote?
What I am suggesting is that in the grand ol' tradition of cause stalking on a national level, any and every single incident that can be will be used to dissuade a positive image of the Islamic belief system.
This is not about a religion's right to be outvalued over a human being . . if you'd calm down long enough to digest what you read you could likely see that my question would be directed at those making the decision to punish Gibbons: is there no mercy?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by planetfall
the common thread? its obvious.
What's not obvious to you is that we are talking about Muslim nations not Muslim individuals. You aren't seeing the good in Muslims, just the negative. You know what that's called?
Originally posted by OptionToChoose
Does that mean I will go blind and pretend that there are no other motive(s) for mainstream media spins, especially in this day and age?
No.
A British teacher arrested in Sudan after allowing her class to name a teddy bear "Mohammed" has been charged by authorities with offending religion, British officials say.
Gillian Gibbons, 54, is being held by police in the capital Khartoum after she asked her class of seven-year-olds to come up with a name for the toy as part of a school project, Robert Boulos, the head of Unity High School told CNN.
It is expected that she will appear in court Thursday, Sudan state media reported.
A British Foreign Office spokeswoman said Gibbons had been charged under Article 125 of Sudan's constitution, the law relating to insulting religion and inciting hatred.
Originally posted by OptionToChoose
Media is the same way. What you are reading, you are being communicated to, or to use another word, a message is being "told". A story is "told". When one watches a movie, does not one seek to be "told" by a good script/production/acting an interesting adventure or romance, or info if the film is a doc?
I try to avoid wordfights, as ususally there is a simple misunderstanding of what one person was trying to say, and more drama enters from the hair-splitting than the actual word in question could ever have hoped to produce
Originally posted by centurion1211I guess these (not all) muslims and their apologists fail to understand that this is exactly the type of thing that "incites hatred" - of muslims.
One Muslim teacher at Unity, who also has a child in Gibbons' class, said she had not found the project offensive.
"I had no problem with it at all," the teacher said. "I know Gillian and she would never have meant it as an insult. I was just impressed that she got them to vote."
“We are surprised and disappointed by the developments,” said Omar Daair, spokesman for the British embassy in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital. “This isn’t the way we were hoping it would go.”
Originally posted by OptionToChoose
Let me clarify "spin" in this case. I don't think there is an attempt to twist what has happened and been somewhat of a shock to many. The spin would be an implied "see, look how unreasonable and violent the Islamic people are!" factor. And in this particular case, plausible deniability protects the spinners.
Originally posted by Sparky63
The Sudanese should ask themselves, "What would Muhhammed do?"
......Or maybe they did already and thats why they decided 40 lashes is justified.
Originally posted by intrepid
And another:
“We are surprised and disappointed by the developments,” said Omar Daair, spokesman for the British embassy in Khartoum, Sudan’s capital. “This isn’t the way we were hoping it would go.”
www.nytimes.com...
Originally posted by 27jd
These aren't fringe extremists, this is the government charging this woman over a teddy bear's name that children chose, that's all that needs to be said.
Sudan charged a British teacher Wednesday with inciting religious hatred after she allowed her students to name a teddy bear Muhammad, an offense that could subject her to 40 lashes, the Justice Ministry said.
If convicted, she faces up to 40 lashes, six months and prison and a fine, said Abdul Daem Zumrawi, the Justice Ministry's undersecretary.
Each child was allowed to take the bear home on weekends and write a diary about what they did with it. The diary entries were collected in a book with the bear's picture on the cover, labeled, "My Name is Muhammad," he said. The bear itself was never labeled with the name, he added.
Although Khartoum officials played down the case and said it was an isolated incident, Sudan's top clerics said in a statement Wednesday that the full measure of the law should be applied against Gibbons, calling the incident part of a broader Western "plot" against Islam.
"What has happened was not haphazard or carried out of ignorance, but rather a calculated action and another ring in the circles of plotting against Islam," the Sudanese Assembly of the Ulemas said the statement.
"It is part of the campaign of the so-called war against terrorism and the intense media campaign against Islam," they said.
Although an earlier report had suggested that only one parent had complained, the clergy statement Wednesday said that several had complained.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Yes, but it still did go the way of bringing charges against the teacher didn't it. In spite of the wishes of this one moderate muslim.