It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blueorder
Like any sage follower you would not seek a static historical literal meaning of a biblical narrative, you look for it's deep philosophical principle.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by blueorder
i'm sorry, but science voids all supernatural explanations to any issue, so creationism isn't an exception
the biblical accountS of genesis do have philosophical meaning, but they don't have any scientific meaning whatsoever.
Even with the great odds of a million to one for intelligent life after you only count the suns with a planet(s) that are in the right spot, and then only the ones that have all that is needed for life this would cut out a very big chunk of our galixy.
So if there is intelligent space faring alien life out there then seeding from some extremely old and vastly superior species would pretty much be the only way to account for it, and then the bible would be Scientifically correct on most accounts.
If you look deep enough you'll find anything. How is the meaning meant to be kept over long periods of time if it's not meant to be taken literally? No one would know the real meaning. This excuse is used every time science proves part of the bible wrong.
Originally posted by gravytrain
Your assuming that we know where intelligent life can exist. We really know very little although we do assume alot.
Originally posted by gravytrain
The bible is not a book of science, its a book of philosophy. Duh. And as far as superious aliens seeding planets i dont discount the idea, but if that is true then what does it change really? Nothing really.
Originally posted by gravytrain
If you possess right discernment as in a good knowledge of your own self and truth then you could really grasp the meaning behind the words of the bible. What has happend is christian priests are trained only academically, not through self-realization and meditation. The result of this over the ages has been a diluted teaching only scratching the surface and often distorting the bible's true meaning.
Originally posted by gravytrain
But why does everyone pick on the bible immedaitly? look into the other books, compare them with the bible, and in doing so you can begin to more easily see the truth hidden in each of the books. Why isnt it litterall you might ask, wouldnt it be so much easier to just say it how it is and not cover things up with metaphors and riddles? Well that is a question you will have to research yourself and you will find the answer if you persevere.
Originally posted by gravytrain
The bible is not meant to be taken litterally, None of the sacred books meant to be taken litterally, except for the abhidarma of course which is a litteral explanation for experienced reality. If you possess right discernment as in a good knowledge of your own self and truth then you could really grasp the meaning behind the words of the bible. What has happend is christian priests are trained only academically, not through self-realization and meditation. The result of this over the ages has been a diluted teaching only scratching the surface and often distorting the bible's true meaning.
But why does everyone pick on the bible immedaitly? look into the other books, compare them with the bible, and in doing so you can begin to more easily see the truth hidden in each of the books. Why isnt it litterall you might ask, wouldnt it be so much easier to just say it how it is and not cover things up with metaphors and riddles? Well that is a question you will have to research yourself and you will find the answer if you persevere.
Yet it describes the Earth as being flat and being in the centre while everything obits it? So many lives have been lost just by saying the Earth is not at the centre.
You think you guys know the real meaning which the person who wrote it wanted to put across? If you count how many things there are it's almost impossible since it's not meant to be taken 'literally'. Those priests sure did a good job not taking Earth in centre of the universe 'literally'...
Because that's the most popular book and why would i point out the flaws in other books i don't know. Also most people in his forum follow the bible and i haven't seen anyone else coming to my door shoving other books in my face.
Originally posted by gravytrain
reply to post by AncientVoid
But why does everyone pick on the bible immedaitly?
I consider myself agnostic.
That said, I believe that the reason that the Bible is referred to so often is that many (if not most) atheist are more anti-religion (specifically anti-Christianity) than they are anti-god.
At least, that has been my experience. I really think that "atheist" is most likely a misnomer.
Originally posted by gravytrain
Where in the bible does it say this? Wasnt it the papacy who said this not the bible?
Originally posted by gravytrain
The bible is a book about this world, maya (devil, delusion) and god (liberation, truth). Just like the world it is going to be hard to figure out, it is going to seemingly contradict itself. For it is explaining reality and reality seemingly contradicts itself when we dont understand it. Just like we are always making new scientific discoveries in the world and changing out theories, so too can the bible be interpreted in many different ways. Only the enlightened men who know the truth of the world through experience can truly appreciate and understand the deep meaning in the bible.
Originally posted by gravytrain
It is the most popular book, thats true. But i just dont understand how you can judge that book without judging and studying the others. Its like someone saying they dont like one boat and there not going to get in it and, NO god forbid there are OTHER boats that you can use to cross the ocean but no youve seen that one boat and ohh my they MUST all be the same!!
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
So, why just not practice religion? I am not really a practitioner of any religion, but I believe in God.. I really don't understand how you jumped from being against religion to trying to disprove the existence of God. Interesting post, nonetheless.
[edit on 21-11-2007 by SpeakerofTruth]
.................WOOOOOOH....................ur talkin about someone u don't even know....unless u know REAL HOLY LOVE....that puts others first....that surpasses SELF....ur/our DAD is LOVE.....sin = disobedience to LOVE.........however i agree, that applys to most who talk about Father...(the more u talk about God, the more u 'de-throne' God)....very few have even seen this Great One...Moses got a sneak preview...there is alot of people hung up in the past, in the OT, an eye for an eye crap...they just don't get it...maybe they never reached the NT & heard what Jesus had to say was the new deal...looked at His wonderful examples of how to live & treat eachother...how many put their neighbour first over SELF...how many even know their neighbour...or give a stuff....everything i have told u about our DAD is true....ur talkin about someone i love & know....someone who blesses me big time everyday....not sure who ur God is, but it's not the Creator of ALL...the God of Abraham & Joseph..........GB
that all things about God are untrue.