I think that the Mars Anomaly Research exploration of the Mars city is very compelling, and really if it is ESA's fault for using images that have been compressed to such a dreadful degree with all of these enigmatic artifacts, it's just dreadful looking at these waffle structures, shopping mall structures, cross structures, and these little triangles and god knows what else. I'm dumb enough to be confused by it even after it's been explained to me. The internet world of images may well be a place where people are expected not to look too far into the details

Dom

Another strange area on Mars - like a ruined city of a bygone era! This is taken through the IAS Viewer.



Cheers!

Interesting area! ( No cracks here!! )



Cheers!

If the 'city' in the Halle crater looks lto some ike a 'farmer's field' viewed from the air, it would nonetheless indicate the presence of a 'farmer' - something other than a natural phenomenon. I went to the ESA 'Mars Express' site and downloaded more than a dozen photos. There are indications of air brushing in most of the photos on the site and some are quite obvious. There are many photos where the 'snow' doesn't completely cover the structures they did not want to be obvious. Others have dark reddish brown x's over areas. The evidences of cities and other construction are so obvious in places that it isn't even subtle. I tend to think this is a purposeful 'leak' rather than a serious of accidental disclosures. As far as I am concerned what is there constitutes an informal announcement that the planet is widely developed. The proverbial 'cat is out of the bag'.

After looking at a large number of photos from the Mars Express site and manipulating them as advised, I believe almost all of what is shown in the majority of them is fabricated. IE: painted and fogged over. A good example is 351-291007-3155-6-nd-01 NoctisLabyrinthus_H1. There are brush marks. The orientation of the marks is not consistent as one would expect of wind blown 'snow' or 'sand'. Almost wherever there is 'snow' - in any photo, often without even manipulating the image you can make out structures underneath. In most of the photos one can see snow that appears in places where it is inconsistent with other deposits on the terrain around it. Sometimes the overlay is sand colored, dark reddish brown, or black.

The development is not just in Halle crater. The planet is replete with cities and other disguised development. There are machines and strange objects. There are a large number of what appear to be both open pit mines and openings in crater walls, etc. We found what appears to be a pipeline. There roads with switchbacks. There is what we believe to be two towers that must be a couple of miles high.

My point in stating that the artificial carpet covering Halle Crater is bigger news than what is underneath it, is that what we are being shown in most of these photos is almost in its entirety a deception. The reason many of the photos look like computer animations or cartoons is because they are so heavily painted over. The implications of that are very interesting. The only true element is the general shape of the terrain. Further, there are certain shapes and objects that show up in different locations.
Check out Claritas Fossae close-up view, looking east. Zoom in on the crater. What the hell is that object suspended in the 'air'? I have seen a few similar objects in photos from diverse areas of the planet. If you zoom out and look carefully about five inches on your screen to the right of the crater, there is a smeared area. Something was blurred out and you can see the strokes. Then look at the showy ridge. On the right side midway down is a cut into the ridge that is not natural. The floor of the cut is flat enough to be a parking lot. There is a lot more in that photo.

In different photos there are structures that have the same characteristic shapes. I believe what is being concealed is a great deal more than a few ancient ruins or one city in Halle crater. It is something so utterly fantastic they don't think a significant segment of humanity is ready or perhaps able to deal with it. I think they are absolutely right in that respect. Star Wars has got nothing on this. What I have seen is utterly fantastic and I envy the guys and gals who get to study the un-retouched photos. In our lifetime we may well get to see what is behind the paint.

I have a reservation about posting ESA photos as suggested, in view of the following terms posted on their site:

"Users may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, display or in any way exploit any of the content, software, material or services, in whole or in part, without obtaining prior written authorisation."

I would dislike being banned from their site. It is more prudent to just reference the photos in question. There is a search engine at the upper right hand corner of the Mars Express photo thumbnail section. It is easy just to type in the name and go to the photo.