Originally posted by blowfishdl
It is a very new substance that has pushed its way onto the market to target fat America.
Dude, it was discovered in 1965 and FDA approved in 1981! That does not qualify as 'very new' in my eyes. It is made from two building blocks of
protein, is one of the MOST widely tested substances, and the studies that scared everybody were flawed. Read the link I posted above, it states the
studies were NOT peer reviewed, they used non-pathogen free rats, etc. Have you ever had a rat as a pet? If you have, you know that after about 1 and
a half to two years, they usually get cancer and die. I never fed my rats ANY aspartame. It was a sham.
It is all our individual decisions whether to trust the Food and Drug administration, or to trust our own gut instincts.
Right, trust your
own gut instincts. But don't let a small number of flawed studies be your gut instinct. Does your gut tell you not to eat
chicken, fish, etc.? What about tomatos? They all contain the same substances aspartame does. It's not some crazy chemical, it's amino acids, which
your body NEEDS.
My own gut instinct tells me that if it has to be separated from the rest of the ingredients, and I'm not as fat as a walrus, I am going to eat sugar
and keep myself eating a bit more naturally. It is your decision if you choose not to.
Well, as long as it's your own, cool. I'm not some rabid fan of aspartame, I like Splenda (sucralose) better, but it's becoming the subject of the
SAME baseless scarelore. The only reason I like either is because sometimes I want a soda without the insane amount of calories in the sugary
versions. The irony is, sugar is subject to the SAME scare tactics...
Sugar is without question one of the most dangerous substances on the food market today.
What we are talking about here is sucrose, the white crystalline sugar refined from cane or beet juice by stripping away all its vitamins, minerals,
protein, fiber, water, and other synergists.
White sugar is an industrially processed chemical not found in nature, and it is not fit for human consumption.
www.hps-online.com...
It even blames violence in prison on sugar...
In a recent study conducted by Dr. C. Keith Connors of the Children's Hospital in Washington, DC, a 'deadly' link was established between the
consumption of sugar with carbohydrates (such as breakfast cereal, cake, and biscuits) and violent behaviour, hypertension, and learning impediments.
In other studies, chronic violence in prisons was remarkably reduced simply by eliminating refined sugar and starch from prison diets. Singapore in
1991 banned sugary soft drink sales from all schools and youth center's, citing the danger that sugar poses to the mental and physical health of
children.
Seriously, ANY substance you can imagine has a group of people frothing at the mouth to alarm you and make you believe it is the MOST deadly substance
a human can ingest, either to sell a book or just cuz they like to scare people. It's ridiculous.