The Aspertame Lawsuit (Equal Sugar Sweetener Is Toxic!), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 10:21 AM by Rilence
reply to post by Byrd



reply to post by Byrd



Agreed Byrd Issues over personalities every time

However, I don't agree that a source ending in .gov is a good and proper source....Regardless of whether it is only a list of links to various research papers on given subject...I'd rather do my own grunt work...

Me personally, I don't trust it...

But as I said, the first part of Your post was most relevant

Thanks and Peace

EDIT -- for clarity

[edit on 14-10-2007 by Rilence]


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 12:05 PM by interestedalways
reply to post by anhinga




Thank you for posting all the links and for sharing your findings.

I never could drink anything that had obvious asparteme in it anyway because it tastes awful!! Give me a coke and I'll pass on the fries for the caloric exchange!

I see people are talking about fresh fruit instead. Great idea. Make sure and find a local farmer because their is scare there, too, with all the genetic modification, but that is another thread............................

Anyway I just wanted to say that I feel my info is increased reading your thread.

There is so much of the stealth virus, not quite defineable ailments effecting many and at all ages that we really do need to look at our diets and the effect it is having on us. We are guinea pigs to all these *solutions* to combat another ailment.


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 12:06 PM by annestacey
Aspartame is a toxic substance that no one should be consuming (along with all the other artificial sweeteners). It's linked to alzheimers, brain tumors and parkinsons disease. In my opinion, any information to the contrary are lies, propaganda or disinformation. Why would ANYONE want to consume chemicals? Why would anyone want to give it to their children?


Aspartame is a chemical that was once on the congressional list of biowarfare agents. It was refused a place in our food supply for sixteen years by the FDA because it was and is a well-known toxic agent. Aspartame was finally approved by a new FDA commissioner put in place by the political influence of Donald Rumsfeld who, as president of the company that owned the patent on Aspartame, wanted to get it approved. This event is a case study in criminal politics and an eye opening view of how corporate America really works.


Source:
www.foodfactor.com...

This website is a wealth of information. It shows how your body really is affected by everything that we put into it (or on it). If you want to be super healthy the way nature intended, stay away from chemicals and eat a raw diet.

There are natural sweeteners that can be used in place of the deadly stuff being pushed in the media (agave, stevia, xylitol, etc. are natural sweeteners that anyone can use and have no chemicals in them).

I've actually made a new rule for myself... don't buy anything advertised in the mainstream media. If I see it on TV, it goes on the black list of things NOT to purchase.


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 02:52 PM by Blaine91555
I don't' see any discussion of the voracity of these lawsuits?

There are constant commercials and ads by Attorneys looking for people willing to sue for about any reason. In fact these commercials plant the idea in peoples minds. Tell them a product will hurt them it will have a Placebo Effect and they know that. Plant that fear in a person who already suffers from anxiety or depression and they will for sure have symptoms even if none exist. That is what the lawyers want to happen. Lawyers sue over lies all the time and make millions and often billions for their dishonesty.

One of my employees has a real problem with this. He actually thinks that the Food Industry, Pharmaceutical Industry and Medical Science are all trying to kill him. Why? Because he believes every negative thing he reads or hears from people hawking phony books or pushing phony lawsuits. The whole concept is ridiculous. Dead people don't buy food. Dead people don't buy drugs. Dead people don't pay for medical care. There is no profit in harming customers, period end of subject. Follow the money. If there is no money it is generally nothing but a hysterical response.

These lawsuits are causing great harm to our society. The cost of defending against them is added into the cost of the products or services and we get stuck with the bill as consumers. The only people profiting off this nonsense are the attorneys and the phony book writers who profit off of peoples fear and radio talk show appearances. Those are the people trying to hurt us. They do profit from their lies and misinformation.


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 03:18 PM by Blaine91555
reply to post by biggie smalls



I don't use sweeteners including sugar. Nobody should. I always get suspicious when an attorney or a class action suit is involved. I trust them even less than the government

When the food industry inadvertently sells a product that may cause harm they of course defend themselves. To say that they include harmful ingredients on purpose is paranoid in my opinion. If they based what they sell on the hysteria on the Internet and the viral marketing of the natural and health food industry there would be nothing on the shelves. If you want to see an example of purposeful lying about food products; read the ingredients at your local natural health food store. They lace everything with sugar and call it health food. I just did that and I was shocked. Sugar in everything in the health food store. Who is fooling who here. They scare you to get you to buy from them and then put sugar in everything to hook you.


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 04:10 PM by RogerT
Originally posted by NRen2k5

I’d say the same, but my father’s diabetic, and I’ve gotten used to Diet being the only thing in the house.



Hi NRen2k5

I recognised your posting style before I read the post name Nice to see you're still here, was beginning to miss you after Wade got canned.

I recommend your dad take a look at Stevia as a replacement to sugar. It's natural, virtually no cals and doesn't mess with BS. Several hundred times sweeter than sugar and has a slight liquorice flavor. I hear Coke is trying to patent it or something like that

On topic, I did a huge amount of research on Aspartame a while back. This nasty chemical has a very dubious history, especially the way it got its FDA approval. Some interesting names involved too, Rumsfeld for one - now there's a name we can trust

Europe initially resisted the substance but pressure from the Money got it through. In 2005 Roger Williams, a UK Member of Parliament, called for emergency action to ban the artificial sweetener Aspartame, questioning its safety. The MP said that there was "compelling and reliable evidence for this carcinogenic substance to be banned from the UK food and drinks market altogether". It's been in and out of the UK press since, but unfortunately, people are just not waking up yet.

the original Board of Inquiry report of the FDA revoking the petition for approval, along with the famed Dr. John Olney's testimony to the Board on the damage aspartame would do to the brains of our children if approved and especially in combination with glutamate. Dr. Olney is one of the most renowned neuroscientists in the world today. You can go to dorway.com and read his CV. He founded the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity after doing studies on aspartic acid, 40% of aspartame, and found it caused lesions in the brains of mice. Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D, wrote the book on it, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills. An excitotoxin is a product that literally stimulates the neurons of the brain to death. The FDA agreed with Dr. Olney, no doubt one of the reasons they revoked the petition for approval. Aspartame was finally approved through the politics of Don Rumsfeld who at the time was CEO of Searle, the original manufacturer.


Dr. Ralph Walton's research on scientific peer reviewed studies and funding which showed 92% of independent, unbiased research shows the aspartame problems. If you remove 6 studies done by the FDA because after approval they became loyal to the manufacturer, and one proindustry summary, 100% of independent scientific peer reviewed studies showed the problems. Only studies funded or controlled by industry ever said it was safe.


There is SOOOO much damning evidence on this neurotoxin, and direct research by reputable scientists, I find it amazing that people still drink the stuff, let alone defend it, especially when several natural alternatives are available for those that cannot use sugar.

You'll find several hundred links to start your research here:
www.wnho.net...

Or the Ramazzini Foundation Studies:
www.ramazzini.it...

Apoligies if these are duplicate links or posts, as I am responding to the first page of this topic.


reply posted on 14-10-2007 @ 05:05 PM by DeadFlagBlues
reply to post by anhinga



I've read conclusive studies about artificial sweetners and haven't uncovered one good thing about them. Our body doesn't know how to effeciently digest them. I'm with you on this one. Just make sure your sources aren't questionable. There's a lot of extremists when it comes to Vegan or at least "organics" that my try and deterr you without giving you die hard evidence. But there is a pretty amazing case against all artificial sweetners.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 8 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 13 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 10 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 7 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 10 days ago with 18 member flags
MPD/DID and Quantum Psychiatry
  Posted 14 days ago with 12 member flags