It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by richierich
Any rational people agree with me?
Originally posted by Boone 870
originally posted by ULTIMA1
April 18, 2002 Princeton, New Jersey
"A lot of [the tape] was unintelligible, and a lot of it we couldn't follow very easily, so I don't think it gives us resolution," said Tom Burnett
There were no boxcutters.
The Arabs were fall guys playing along and had no idea there were being set up to die.
Even if they DID somehow defy incredible odds and manage to somehow sneak boxcutters thru 4 sets of security...
...that still cannot explain how a small man with a boxcutter could: Slash or cut or otherwise get thru the locked cockpit doors..
...and then somehow disable or kill both pilots...haul their bodies out of the cramped cockpits..
..and so fast that not even ONE pilot could move his thumb on the yoke and push the radio button.
Not one plane showed any deviation from the flight path...
no pilot rolled the plane..as all pilots would do..to try and throw the highjackers off long enough to take control AND place a mayday.
it HAD to be remote control. no other way.
To ask anyoner to accept the official story is an insult. It really is.
..Barbara Olson supposedly told Ted that the pilot was in the back...
why did many airline companies remove the remote control aspect of their planes after 9/11 ?
Or...if you do not buy the above scenario...here is the alternative. The hijackers forced themselves into the cockpit WHILE the Flight Attendants were opening the cockpit doors.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Nonsense!! As if a cockpit door could be kicked in FOUR times and yet not ONEpilot being able to send a radio message...right.
You ail to note that IN FLIGHThighjackings are far different than those on the ground.
The pilots of planes in the air would NOT give uip the controls...no way.
NEVER in all of aviation has a highjacker taken the pilots out and assumed control. Never.
highjackers always have political motives and want to live
...now you want us to believe that the highjackers wanted the least qualified to fly...sure. nonsense.
Yopu have done nothing but assume things not in evidence.
There would be FOUR sets of radio messages with yelling and cockpit invasion noise if the official lie was true...
yet all we have is a phony tape of some ' highjacker' that supposedly mistook the radio for an intercom!!
You have proven NOTHING...
all you have done is to try and get us to believe the impossible:
That FOUR sets of pilots were INSTANTLY taken
without any chance to move a muscle...and thats nonsense.
NO ONE has answered this: HOW could FOUR sets of ' highjakers' gain instant and total victory in those cockpits?
No fighting by the crew,huh?
They just all squealed like sissies and fled the cockpits, right?
Burlingame alone would have fought like a tiger rather than give up his plane to some unknown pilot...
and if you add the HUNDREDS of ' inexplicable nomalies' associated with this event to the mix, no intelligent person could assume what you do...it is silly.
NO PROOF exists that supports the official lie. None.