Originally posted by LowLevelMason
reply to post by Harassment101
Yes, the research clearly shows you are incorrect. Conveniently, all you do is quote from the same websites that themselves never offer any actual
evidence.
Where is this London Telegraph article?
Where are all these ads advertising for "adult stalkers" - I would think it would be easy to find just one since millions are employed!
What you have found is articles and taken them out of context. Think about it - if there was a massive gang stalking issue, why is it these abuses
keep getting reported? Because they are not gang stalking. Gang stalking does not exist.
The one single article you quoted is a perfect example of paranoia run awry - this is a few town councils using single individuals (not groups) to spy
(not stalk) on terrorist suspects. Further, the article does not state anyone was spied on that was not a terrorism suspect. Nice try, but this is not
evidence for "organized gang stalking."
[edit on 29-9-2008 by LowLevelMason]
Since you seem to think that books, newspapers, and historical facts are not actualy proof, what do you consider to be actual proof, because for some
of us, that is what we use as actual proof. Maybe you use a wijja board or something. I don't know.
For the london telegraph article, why don't you click on the link I provided for you, you know the link that you ignored in the other thread, and
said that it had no relavance to gang stalking. That link. Yeah.
The abuses with the anti-terror laws were happening, but were not being reported. Just like abuses in the Catholic church were happening for over 50
years and not getting reported, just because something does not get reported by main stream media, does not mean that it is not happening.
What we not have is the abuses that Gang Stalking targets were reporting being now verified by the media, and everything that we have said, is
starting to be backed up. People didn't believe that stalking 24/7 was possible, there are now three families who are making these very public
claims. I am not saying these families were gang stalking, but they are proof that 24/7 stalking is possible. The kind that Targeted Individuals talk
about.
The articles, which again you clearly are not reading, all state very clearly that people are being spied upon for anti-social behaviours, (do you
know what that is?) Littering, small things. But they are putting these people under terror investigations, using R.I.P.A. laws.
The articles clearly show that families were being spied on in this way, and it's disgraceful for you to come here and belittle the violations of
privacies they suffered. These people were not terroists, and they were not suspected of being terrorists, but they were put under what are normally
terrorist investigations.
Using the following, being followed around in public, some had email and mail opened, some were audio and video monitored, some had these Covert Human
Intellegent Sources move into their council neighbourhood to spy on them. Etc.
Now if you want to continue to mock and disregard what proof has been provided, claiming to have gone over it, when you clearly have not, then you are
welcome to do so, but many are moving forward. Now that we know that the abuses are taken place and proven, targets now need to find out what they can
do.