‘Ship of Giants’ Said Attacked By Israel in Strike on Syria, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 24-9-2007 @ 08:40 AM by arktkchr

One of the most unusual reports we have seen, to date, on the Middle East war comes to us today from Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) on the reported Israeli Air Force strike on Syrian territory, and which, if accurate, does indeed explain Israeli opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu’s top adviser, Mossad veteran Uzi Arad’s statement to the American Newsweek News Service on this raid, and who is quoted as saying, "I do know what happened, and when it comes out it will stun everyone."

Western media reports on Israel’s raid into Syrian territory continue their attempting to link this strike with alleged nuclear material coming from North Korea to Syria, and which in some reports say that Israeli commandos seized ‘nuclear material’.

Syria continues, to this day, their stringent denials of an Israeli airstrike, of any kind, on its territory; North Korea, likewise, has issued a denial of transferring nuclear material to the Middle East.

www.whatdoesitmean.com...


Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

Mod Note (This Appears On Every New Thread/Post Reply Page): AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts or simple "I agree" posts when replying to threads. If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sites that supports the thread; please post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item as it relates to the thread.

[edit on 24/9/2007 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 24-9-2007 @ 01:46 PM by Mirthful Me
reply to post by Indellkoffer



I've had enough of Sorcha Faal:

Sorcha Faal... Internet Hoax Queen Courtesy of David Booth...

Hopefully as more and more people become familiar with David Booth in drag, the less likely threads like this will occur.


reply posted on 1-3-2008 @ 09:33 AM by anhinga
(...before understanding the workings of ATS, not realizing one can't delete or change a screen-name, the OP is from yours truly, for the record. Needed to clarify that disclosure of good 'ol human error; and as the t&c goes, this prevents 'conversing w/ yourself', rightfully so.... also, I notice people seem to enjoy railing one another versus explaining why something maybe a 'hoax'.... mods, is this 'disclaimer' cool/okay? I can't 'help' being interested in some of my past threads!)

So, aside from the 'far-fetched' tone of said article, these skulls are interesting. I've found that 'skull stretching' could be the explanation. Yet, when researching cranioplasties and trepanation, none of the modern examples look like the 'cone'-headed ones, maybe because, then, *they* were putting elements into their heads after 'drilling' the hole.... then, this brief article piqued my interest, since the date mentioned is incredible:

There is no greater baffling enigma than the case of the Paracas skull. In 1993, a large slab of rock broke off the cliffs on the Yumague Inlet on the Paracas Peninsula. The Ojo Newspaper in Lima, Peru, published an article on November 17, 2003 of the incredible discovery of a fossilized human skull and other fossils in a layer of rock dated to sixty million years ago.


www.dinosaursandman.com...

Paracas graves have revealed some strange practices. On the left is a Paracas skull deformed by binding the growing head of an infant. The resulting domed head was considered beautiful. On the right is a skull with a hole made by a primitive, but apparently often survivable, surgical technique called trepanation. Photographed in the Museo Regional de Ica.


www.culturefocus.com...
www.trafford.com...



[edit on 1-3-2008 by anhinga]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^