posted on Aug, 12 2007 @ 03:46 PM
Why would the media report on an event like this, only to bury it literally an hour or two after being reported live? When I was watching it all
unfold live on TV, it just didn't sit right with me. I'll be honest and say that only a few months before that event, I'd discovered the whole 9/11
coverup and it kind of delved me into the oft-sktizoid world of conspiracy theories and paranormal blah blah. Most of it is bull#, to me... but there
are cases that stick out in my mind across the board of conspiracy theories, and one of them is Gary Mckinnon stubling upon non-airbrushed photos of
UFOs while he was hacking his way through NASA's computer systems... and something in the interview with him on Project Camelot's site stood out to
me recently, and made me remember the NASA shooting. He said that this particular computer which contained UFO pictures was in building 8 of the
JOHNSON SPACE CENTER, which I assume is the building where they do photographic work. Building 44, however, was a "satellite" tracking &
communications center. As we all know, satellite is a very general word that describes ANY objects that are orbiting earth.. All reports say that the
shooter was a "nice guy" and a "good employee" all the way up until the day of the shooting... and him along with the three or so hostages were
seen sitting and having lunch together earlier that day. It just seems very suspicious to me that a good employe, nice guy would just all the sudden
SNAP and reign misery down upon his friends/colleagues. It happens, but not normally, and NASA employees no doubt would've undergone extensive
psychological tests and background checks before initial employment. They wouldn't have hired a potential snapcase with emotional problems to work in
sensetive areas of a government facility. "He just snapped" is such an overused excuse to cover up truth, it's not even funny... plus the fact that
before the shooter "killed himself", he scribbled a message of some sort on a whiteboard, which authorities have never revealed. I have always been
very suspicious of what actually happened with this shooting and what the motives were. I don't buy that they haven't found any motives and just
decided to stop investigating it because they deemed it unimportant. Something motivated him, and being fired just doesn't seem like a valid
motivation. He had no history of being mentally disturbed or violent. He probably made enough money to be able to retire. He was old enough to!
If anyone has any information or theories as to what this incident was all about, please feel free to elaborate. Seems like even the conspiracy world
has forgotten about this potentially significant event.
I'm not saying that this is evidence of anything, but maybe someone should investigate into it a little more, because I smell a dead rat. A big fat
dead rat that the exterminator intentionally left, hoping no one would notice.
[edit on 12-8-2007 by indierockalien]