It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lyingunderoath
Can't imagine the Stelth bomber/fighter flew low over O'Hare to get any point across...let alone something like this, but odds are against this.
Gigantic Phoenix triangle floating over so many, as well as the O'Hare event, just does not fit any mold our team would do for any reason...
We have the amazing craft, or someone else beyond us has..one or the other.
I saw no features whatsoever --- as I said before, there was something about the texture that halfway perplexed me, because while it seemed by its shading almost reflective, it didn't really seem to have a mirror like surface.
my impression is that it was highly reflective, with the upper part mirroring the lighter sky and the underneath mirroring the darker areas (as well as being naturally shaded). "Mirroring" is actually an awkward word, as the "texture" of the craft didn't seem highly polished
Because it has, almost has, this…fuzzy opalescent quality to it. Not mirror-like reflection yet able to reflect but it didn’t seem like a mirror-like metallic hard metal surface.
J.H.: There was a distortion in the immediate sky area very close up to it but a visible distortion [2] which I could see when I looked at it through the reading glasses.
apc, the object had an odd visual effect to it... the sort-of-mirrorlike-yet-sort-of-"fuzzyish" quality... but I did think it was rotating rapidly and counter-clockwise. There was a vague visual effect that seemed to indicate a spinning motion and a slight disruption or distortion of the air very close to the object.
Once I parked, the runways, etc., over that way weren't visible to me, but the object was still high enough to be visible... in fact, it seemed a little "fatter" to me there, which I took to indicate that it was either doing a fat wobble, which I couldn't outright see although that would account for the almost pearly-soft or "fuzzy" effect, or because of its angle I was now able to see a bit more of its underside and less of its top.
Could this be how war of the worlds happen?
I mean we see a UFO, and attack it, what will their
response be?
Originally posted by Lexion
And, Kleverone,
Thanks for catching this uber faux paux first.
But, why would it need to be anti-gravity ?
Why not directed/vectored thrust ?
I don't think they would respond, at least not by destroying us. If they meant us harm, we wouldn't be here.
Originally posted by 3_Libras
Whats strange is that there have been respected people before who have said that UFOs have shown up on radar a number of times..and thats one of the way they detected these objects. And now this one wasnt detected on radar?
The Chicago Tribune (2007) article stated, "Some of the witnesses, interviewed by the Tribune, said they are upset that neither the government nor the airline is probing the incident." In the words of an alleged United Airlines baggage handler witness, "Some of us are getting angry with this being hushed up with all the terrorism and TSA idiots hanging around. If we see a funny looking bag all damn hell breaks loose but park a funny silver thing a few hundred feet above a busy airport and everyone tries to hush it up. It just don’t (sic.) make sense." (Appendix E.4, #5)
Originally posted by AlexDJ
The one thing that i can tell you..is that people who actually can see the aura (the energy that is expelled by every living thing)..can see them in the sky easy. Because their ships expell energy...and they cant cloak or hide that..they can hide to you eyes..but not to the energy... sometimes i can see them too ( when i am sensible and i can actually see the aura on people).. i will describe what i see...it's not so hard:
I see the blue sky..and see up and i can see their UFO shapes..(oval shape..or normal UFO disk type).. outside the the shape i can see the color of the sky has it should be...but inside the shape i can see the sky color a tone darker than the outside shape (or ring..or siluotte).. thats how i see them..and yes..they are buzzing the sky all the time in great quantities...
I hope this helps a little bit ...
Originally posted by Donoso
Oh well, this is just another one of those cases that shows an extremely strong data set towards:
A) Extraterrestrial Machine
B) Black Ops Project - Possible reverse engineering?
Originally posted by behindthescenes
What I'd really love to know is what happened to the alleged pictures/video of the object. NOT the one that we here at ATS quickly disproved, but the real deal.
Drexon..yes i can say to you that most of the UFO are cloaked all the time......heck they fly close to buildings so close in fact that they can be 10 to 20 mts above the buildng and nobody will detected.
only the ones who want to be seen get their cloaks out..just to see our reactions, but they choose when and how and to who...not us.
The one thing that i can tell you..is that people who actually can see the aura (the energy that is expelled by every living thing)..can see them in the sky easy.
Because their ships expell energy...and they cant cloak or hide that..
and yes..they are buzzing the sky all the time in great quantities...
I hope this helps a little bit ...
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
HA HA, a 152 pages on some crap ufo sighting (hovering for 10 minutes and NO ONE SAW IT LONG ENOUGH TO GET A PICTURE) Sounds like this goof ball is trying to further his own ego. There SIMPLY IS NOT ENOUGH SCIENTIFIC MATERIAL IN THIS INVESTIGATION TO EVEN WARRANT 152 PAGES OF UTTER RUBBISH.
Originally posted by disownedsky
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
HA HA, a 152 pages on some crap ufo sighting (hovering for 10 minutes and NO ONE SAW IT LONG ENOUGH TO GET A PICTURE) Sounds like this goof ball is trying to further his own ego. There SIMPLY IS NOT ENOUGH SCIENTIFIC MATERIAL IN THIS INVESTIGATION TO EVEN WARRANT 152 PAGES OF UTTER RUBBISH.
How many of those 152 pages did you read? I thought it was a sober and thoughtful report that was honest about how much could be concluded from the evidence at hand. Could it be done better if the investigators had been given open access to witnesses who didn't feel the threat of job or career truncation? Could it be done better if these investigators actually got a little funding for their work so they could do it full time?
Could it be done better without the giggle factor that UFO believers themselves have so energetically fostered?
Yes.
Originally posted by Telos
Well I finished reading the report. I would say definitely the best report ever done on a ufo sighting. Well written and very convincing. I think the whole idea is not to prove that the object was there and was an object indeed and not a weather balloon or a swamp gas.
June 29, 1952; O'Hare Airport, Chicago, Illinois.
5:45-6:30 p.m. (CDT).
3 USAF air policemen, 83rd Air Base Sq, Air Police Detachment, S/Sgt. Lopez, A/1c Weber, and A/3c Korkowski, saw a bright silver, smooth surfaced, flat oval 30 ft object at about 500 to1,000 ft height about 2-3 miles away reflecting sunlight surrounded by a blue circle of haze for the first 20-25 mins, hovering, appeared between radio towers for stations WGN and WBBN 7 miles away to the WSW at about 2° elevation and to the left and S of the setting sun, then move very fast to the right and left, and up and down relative to the radio towers, moving almost instantaneously and much faster than any jet fighter. Object rocked on its longitudinal axis, appeared oval when oriented vertically, thin and difficult to see when horizontal.
Object receded at high speed then disappeared like shutting off a light. No trail, no noise. Independently witnessed by Chicago firemen several miles away.
Link