It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1952
3 USAF air policemen, 83rd Air Base Sq, Air Police Detachment, S/Sgt. Lopez, A/1c Weber, and A/3c Korkowski, saw a bright silver, smooth surfaced, flat oval 30 ft object at about 500 to1,000 ft height about 2-3 miles away reflecting sunlight surrounded by a blue circle of haze for the first 20-25 mins, hovering, appeared between radio towers for stations WGN and WBBN 7 miles away
Link
2006
I immediately called our operations center to confirm the sighting and the FAA was contacted while I drove to the other concourse to talk with the witnesses. I spoke with an employee working that gate who said he was compelled to look straight up for some reason and was startled to see the craft hovering silently. He then made the radio call and notified the pilots at that gate who opened the front windows and witnessed the object for themselves.The employee stated the object was 500-1000 feet above the ground, rotating, and metallic in nature with no lights. He said it looked like a frisbe and was directly above.
Link
Originally posted by expat2368
Well, it did not take long for that one to disappear. All the links to the report are dead ends.
Originally posted by jritzmann
All that is strictly a guess. I am however convinced there indeed was a significant object over O'hare that day, and it would seem to follow other hallmarks of paranormal activity based on the anti-structural environment.
Originally posted by Equinox99
Could this be how war of the worlds happen?
I mean we see a UFO, and attack it, what will their
response be?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Are you sure it was an object? I noticed NARCAP calls it an UAP or unidentified aerial phenomenon and if there was ever a case for referring to a sighting as a UAP instead of a UFO, I think this is such a sighting.
The National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena was established late in 2000, and is dedicated to the advancement of aviation safety issues as they apply to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).
NARCAP collects data regarding aviation community reports of aerial encounters with lights or objects that seem inconsistent with known categories of aircraft and common natural phenomena. These lights or objects are reported to appear in a variety of colors and shapes. We refer to these objects or lights as Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).
Pilots and other aviation specialists often report that these lights or objects closely approach aircraft. Encounters with these lights or objects, UAP, have a demonstrated a variety of safety related effects on pilots, crew, cockpit discipline and on-board instrumentation. Until these effects are understood and reasonable operating procedures are developed, there exists a tangible threat to aviation safety. Comparable issues in the aviation arena include wind shear and other types of events with a low frequency of occurance.
Though aerial encounters with Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) have been documented at least since the 1930's, the aviation industry has been hesitant about addressing this matter. Cold War security issues, cultural mythology as well as concerns about image have prohibited many aviation executives from pursuing this matter with more curiosity. Certainly many cases have gone unreported by aviation professionals for the same reason.
Link
Originally posted by karl 12
Arbitrageur, I don't think NARCAP makes a distinction between the two descriptions and prefers to refer to all the UFO reports they investigate as 'UAP'.
NARCAP - These lights or objects are reported to appear in a variety of colors and shapes. We refer to these objects or lights as Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP).
HA HA, a 152 pages on some crap ufo sighting (hovering for 10 minutes and NO ONE SAW IT LONG ENOUGH TO GET A PICTURE) Sounds like this goof ball is trying to further his own ego. There SIMPLY IS NOT ENOUGH SCIENTIFIC MATERIAL IN THIS INVESTIGATION TO EVEN WARRANT 152 PAGES OF UTTER RUBBISH.
Originally posted by fleabit
Unless of course, you are suggesting that people who WORK AT AN AIRPORT every day, see aircraft CONSTANTLY, have no idea what they are talking about in regards to a non-conventional craft floating above their airport.
I would suggest that NOBODY can be trusted to give 100% accurate and reliable eyewitness accounts, NOBODY, including myself, and I'm talking about the people that AREN'T hoaxing. And I don't think you or Dr Haines seem to show an appreciation of this fact. You would think that pilots make better observers but even with all their experience they are also subject to making misidentifications.
Originally posted by fleabit
Perhaps there is some bizarre, natural phenomena that could cause this visual effect.. or the hole in the clouds. The tricky bit imo, is both. Had just one or the other occurred, perhaps it would be easier to explain away.
But to give next to no credit for the experience of those making this sighting is ridiculous imo. They are not hoaxers, hacks, nor even inexperienced when it comes to aerial objects. When you say they are "not reliable," what exactly do you mean? That they were fooled by the weather conditions? Or what exactly?
What about the sighting makes you think they may not be reliable witnesses in what they reported? What could they be mistaking, for something else?
Or possibly the exhaust from a jet engine?
They undoubtedly rank amongst the most eccentric sky phenomena on the planet: the metres-wide rings of vapour or smoke that can be seen floating through the air on occasion.
The physics behind these "vortex rings" is very complex. Moreover, vortex rings do not always form in the same way. In most instances, the rings are formed by air mixed with smoke or steam that is forced out of a (relatively) small circular or cylindrical opening (this can be a chimney, the barrel of a canon, or a vent in a volcano crater).
Originally posted by mitman93
On Youtube I had subscribed to my favorite local newstation. In their latest video, they had a supposed UFO sighting over King's Dominion Amusement park. I wasn't quite sure what to make of it. So, I quickly made my 20 posts and made this thread
What do you guys think it is?
UPDATE: Wavy News has made another video. This time explaining on what the object could be...
Originally posted by Starseed32
This does not look like a smoke ring to me. It doesn't even look like a reflection. I think it could possible be a disc that is partially cloaked. The outer ring is visiable but the center part of the object is blending in with the overcast sky.
Originally posted by Ansiroth
hmmm, doesnt look like a smoke ring to me. Iv'e blown lots of smoke rings in my life and for something to emit a smoke ring that large i'd almost speculate that whatever created it might as well have been designed to blow it out intentionally.
Originally posted by fleabit
After several minutes, they witnessed this thing shooting upwards at a great velocity, so much, it was hard for some to see it depart at all, and it punched a hole in the clouds.
Originally posted by Superiorraw
Now at this stage, dont we have CCTV?
Originally posted by fleabit
It appeared almost instantly, as the object accelerated vertically. It left that hole. You can read all about the theories of a vertical column of fumes. It's a far reach. Especially at the rate it appeared.
Other studies indicate recall estimates from four seconds to five minutes for a 20 second interval, and from one second to 60 seconds for a four second interval.
I never said it was common, and perhaps the one thing we can all agree on is that it's unusual, whatever it was. And while I think the argument that unusual events occur rarely has merit, it can only be used to dismiss cases that would be seen commonly if it's an unusual occurrence. In this case, if it's an unusual occurrence and seeing it happens rarely, then it's consistent.
And if this was a common phenomena, it would have been seen and reported at airports for a very long time now.