It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xmotex
If you haven't noticed yet, we're in much the same boat (arguably much worse) with regards to deficit spending, despite not having a decent public healthcare system.
And as far as corporations vs. governments goes - governments are at the least accountable to the voters, corporations are accountable to no-one except their shareholders.
Moore opens his film by giving these statistics, "Fifty million uninsured Americans
43.6 million, or about 15 percent of Americans
The United States spends more than 15 percent of its GDP on health care -- no other nation even comes close to that number. France spends about 11 percent, and Canadians spend 10 percent.
THE NUMBER OF UNINSURED AMERICANS IS AT AN ALL-TIME HIGH
Data released today by the Census Bureau show that the number of uninsured Americans stood at a record 46.6 million in 2005, with 15.9 percent of Americans lacking health coverage. “The number of uninsured Americans reached an all-time high in 2005,” said Robert Greenstein, executive director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “It is sobering that 5.4 million more people lacked health insurance in 2005 than in the recession year of 2001, primarily because of the erosion of employer-based insurance.”
Originally posted by Tweaked
I have had a rapid decline in my health since January 2007. The acid reflux is chronic.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Blain, your whole post was a blatant example of biased flaming. Did you even watch the moive? Or are you just a flat out Moore hater? I don't care for moore either, but face it, it is the healthcare industry that needs to be scrutinized, not moore.
In two Cuban hospitals I visited, the lack of the most basic materials was pathetic. Hospital personnel were begging me for anything I had that could be used to help the sick. One hospital asked me for dental floss because they'd run out of suture material.
But in "Sicko," Cuba has it all. One of Moore's companions needs a specialized $150 inhaler. She walks into a Cuban pharmacy and—voila!—she easily finds the inhaler. In fact, she buys three for about 5 cents each!
Originally posted by grimreaper797
See there is this thing, it is called cause and effect.
When you take X amount of dollars to pay for health care, X amount of dollars must come from somewhere.
Where does it come from? Well the rich will have to pay grossly large taxes, and even still you would haven an unbalanced budget.
Tell me how you plan to raise enough money to afford free healthcare? Where is this money coming from?
The rich? Have you taken into account what will happen as a result of this taxation, or lack there of?
You will decimate the economy with creating a balanced budget free health care system.
This isn't a prediction, its common sense.
When you heavily tax the upper class, they are going to stop spending money.
The poor are trying to make ends meet. Good luck with the economy.
Also, have you taken into account the idea these people may simply stop working hard?
What's the point of working hard if you can blow it off and get the same services?
work hard, get taxed ridiculously. Don't work hard, get services from the government.
Which do you think most people are going to choose? Just use commonsense when looking at the issue.
Entitlements simply don't work.
Ok so you have created a balanced budget and implemented the free healthcare system. How do you plan to address the increasing population problem?
Are we going to start limiting families one child per family?
This is what I had about these entitlement programs. They don't give a rats ass about the long term future of our country,
so long as they get the feel-good moral forfilment from saying they made a difference and helped some people get healthcare,
when in reality what they did is take the future of our country and flush it down the toilet to give the less fortunate what they felt was entitled to everyone.
Entitlements will never work in a long term, ever. Its not predictions, its commonsense.
Entitlements create unbalance which will get balanced out one way or another.
Originally posted by Fett Pinkus
But that does not explain why the same medicine could be so cheap does it?
That is an extreme price difference and Moore used it to show how greedy and profit orientated the US Pharma industry and the Health insurerers really are.
Originally posted by melatonin
The NHS may not be perfect, but I wouldn't swap it for the American system any day of the week. Wouldn't even dream of it.
I watched this last night, I was pretty much shocked. The people Moore's focuses on actually had insurance but were well and truly f***ed over by money grabbing insurance companies.
You pay twice as much and seem to get less of an outcome in many ways. I can't believe people actually defend the current system.
Profit and health care do not mix well IMHO.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
(visit the link for the full news article)
Michael Moore's "Sicko," which opened nationwide Friday, is filled with horror stories of people who are deprived of medical service because they can't afford it or haven't been able to navigate the murky waters of managed care in the United States.
It compares American health care with the universal coverage systems in Canada, France, the United Kingdom and Cuba.
Originally posted by Muaddib
I don't think anyone is claiming there are no problems with the U.S. healthcare system, but changing to a NHS means more taxes and much lower salaries.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Actually it wouldn't have to mean more taxes, but in our (publicly accepted)system of inequality driven domination by systematic design, that's what would result.
Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
That's a great film (piece of propaganda), really, but this is a troubling issue for me. You see we've been subjected to nearly 100 years of multi-generational taxation and institutionalized dumbing down and I'm quite certain that if it weren't for such domestic economic imperialism the masses wouldn't be so abused and depleted to need such a system that ensures everyone needs federal "care". But as it stands it's needed and fast. I hope you're all proud of the truth that American (militaristic global) Hegemony has created for US all, because that's the cause of it all.
Originally posted by Muaddib
I don't think anyone is claiming there are no problems with the U.S. healthcare system, but changing to a NHS means more taxes and much lower salaries.
In many of those countries where there are NHS people get paid much less than in places like the U.S., and the NHS is not perfect either.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Ohh right, so i guess such a system would just pay itself out of thin air then?
it wasn't Moore's fault that he lied ,
it has been "U.S. Imperialism" which caused Moore to lie......
"claiming the healthcare system of a dictatorship is better than that of the U.S.".... or even that "the U.S. healthcare system can learn from the healthcare system of a DICTATORSHIP.....
As for taxation, in any society there will always be a need for a system which would pay for any, and every public service which takes care of cleaning the streets, repairing streets and other public property, unless some people think that no society needs to take care of public property, highways, streets, cleaning up cities etc, etc...
Originally posted by Stellar
That is presuming a gold standard of basically discounting inflation, deflation and all the other things that results from governments , such as the American one, who have been printing money at breakneck speed for decades now.
Originally posted by StellarX
The rich are paying ever less much as the corporations are and it's just a lie that the rich are frequently anywhere near negatively affected ( OMG, no new private plane or car this year!!) by taxes as the vast majority of working poor who do pay taxes while busy starving to death.
Originally posted by StellarX
The taxpayers? There is plenty of money for 'defense' budgets and for corporate subsidies, and massively so for private health care and pharmaceutical giants who's patents are protected by government regulations, so why pretend that there is no money for national health care programs?
Originally posted by StellarX
Explain why this would happen while so many countries spend so much money on 'defense' without destroying their economies?
Originally posted by StellarX
Common sense rarely 'works' without the ability to observe reality effectively.
Originally posted by StellarX
No one cares if they buy one less car this year or can only afford three of four vacations a year. Spa's don't create very many jobs and neither do making cars.
Originally posted by StellarX
The poor are trying to make ends meet because the very rich are manipulating the system in such a way they they just never quite manage to. At the very least we should tax them far more heavily and make them stay in the country the earned their riches in.
Originally posted by StellarX
Why should people work hard for pathetic salaries that allows them nothing but basics? Why should the rich be able to sit on their behinds while hundreds slave away in their factories for cents per hour?
Originally posted by StellarX
What's the point of a system where people work twelve hours a day and still starve? If your rich it makes a great deal of sense to keep others poor so they will be forced to work for however little you wish to pay them and why would anyone but the very rich of the stupidly ignorant want to be part of such a system?
Originally posted by StellarX
The vast majority of the worlds people work very hard for almost no return and if you call sitting behind a desk hard work i suggest working with a shovel all day and returning to your cold, dank hovel at night to share whatever food you could afford with your wife and kids and the older family members who were worked into a condition where they are no longer any good with shovels.
Originally posted by StellarX
People behind desks may be 'exploited' ( working for pay is being exploited as your worth more to them than they are paying you) but the argument that they work 'hard' is nonsense. I have done both and frankly you can take pills for headaches you might get from thinking a bit too hard in your air conditioned cubicle. I'm not saying people behind desks should not demand more but that do understand that they have already achieved a great deal and that the vast majority of the worlds population would LOVE to be in their lucky positions as can easily be proved by looking at the rise of SEA manufacturing and business services.
Originally posted by StellarX
So why do the rich get such vast tax breaks&subsidies, government and legal protections for their economic crimes while the poor gets thrown in jail when they try to break out of the economic restraints imposed on them?
Originally posted by StellarX
There is no such thing as 'population problems' and only mismanagement, theft and suppression of large parts of the population. In a system where people are allowed to educate themselves and do the best they can each individual adds to the countries potential for wealth ( why is the US so relatively rich with 300 000 million while countries with only a few tens of millions experience such poverty? Would Americans get richer or poorer with half the workers gone?)
Originally posted by StellarX
And to even begin balancing the proverbial books we need to get rid of socialism for the and welfare for the rich and capitalism and regressive taxes for the poor.
Stellar